Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Elderly Care Medicine
Hysio organises your admission, home visit, ward round or care planning conversation: source, functioning, examination and management plan kept apart. The medical assessment stays with you.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
A profession-specific structure for complex care of older people: functioning, frailty and context, with source, findings, examination and management plan under their own headings.
Read how Hysio comes along to an admission, a home visit, a ward round or a conversation about advance care planning. Hysio records what was said, seen and decided, in the documentation formats of the specialty.
The format follows the contact, not the topic. A comprehensive history at admission belongs in the Elderly Care Medicine Admission Intake, where the history and the collateral history each get their own heading alongside past medical history and functioning. If you take the same history with someone at home, the Home Visit fits; if it is a short round on the ward, the Ward Round. In all three, the request for help goes under reason for contact, with the source alongside it. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [1] [12]
Keep them apart. The current medication is a personal detail that belongs to the patient and not to this one contact. What someone close to the patient says about taking the medication, side effects or their own burden belongs in the history and collateral history, with the relationship noted. Put both under fixed headings, so that a colleague can later see who supplied what and when. You record a change in the medication under the management plan, because that is your decision. [2] [1] [11]
Separate observation and judgement. What the care staff report about restlessness or disorientation you record as a source report, your own observation goes under the examination findings and a stated conclusion stands apart. You copy a score literally with instrument, value, date and assessor. Then choose deliberately where the text goes: the medical treatment record carries the medical line, the care and living plan the agreements for daily care. [11] [1] [2]
From someone close to the patient, record only what is needed for this care. Name and relationship may be included, because without a source role the report is not accurate; details about the health or situation of that person themselves do not belong in the patient's record. Who was present, who is the representative and what consent was given for are three separate facts, and you record them separately too. When in doubt, follow the rules of your institution. [9] [12] [1]
Hysio costs €20 per person per month for Starter, €40 for Pro and €80 for Unlimited, each excluding VAT. With a yearly subscription, you pay for ten months and get twelve. The difference lies in the number of sessions per month, not in what a documentation format may record: the boundaries around functioning, examination and management plan are the same in every plan. The current terms are on the Hysio pricing page. [7] [8]
Your own template in your record system works well for short, uniform contacts in which you are typing anyway. Check whether the template keeps source roles identifiable when the source is spoken and several people contribute: the patient, a daughter and care staff. Then compare on that one point. Can you still see in the end result who said what and when? If that holds up, your own route is good enough. [1] [11] [12]
Read back the drug, strength, dose and frequency against the source they come from, and not against your memory. A name that looks complete in the text but was only half pronounced in the dictation should remain incomplete until you fill it in. If a dose is missing, leave that gap visible. With polypharmacy, a list that has been filled in is more dangerous than a list that is honestly incomplete. [1] [12] [10]
Conduct the conversation as you always do. With someone who has cognitive complaints, it helps not to type while taking the history, but to let the contact run its course and only afterwards dictate what you saw and discussed. Ask someone close to the patient specifically for additions instead of letting them take over the conversation. Afterwards, read back whether the text still reflects how the contact really went. [1] [2] [11]
The difference lies in attribution. In free dictation, it must remain clear which words come from the patient, the daughter and the care worker. The elderly care medicine documentation formats set participants and source roles apart and keep the collateral history separate from what the patient says themselves. What the source does not support stays empty instead of being plausibly filled in. Weighing that information remains your work. [1] [2] [11]
Start small and measurable. Take one type of contact, for example the ward round on your own ward, and for two weeks put side by side what you would have written yourself about walking, transfers and falls and what the organised text makes of it. Agree who reads it through before anything goes into the record. If it works there, you extend to the home visit and the admission. [8] [9] [1]
For a broad first admission, this format fits. It keeps reason for contact, participants and source roles, past medical history, history and collateral history, functioning and context, physical examination and additional investigations apart, with conclusion and management plan as their own headings. As a result, frailty comes back as a description of functioning and not as a standalone label. With voice-driven reporting, anything the source does not mention gets the fixed line that it has not been documented. The conclusion remains yours. [2] [1] [12]
For a visit at home, yes. The home visit report has its own heading for functioning and home context, where the stairs, the thresholds, the management of medication and the burden on the informal carer belong. The patient's report, the collateral history, the home care report and your own observations stay separate. No summarising advice is added that you have not stated. Reason, finding and the agreed follow-up each stand under their own heading. [3] [1] [12]
For a short contact on the ward during a round, this format fits best. It starts with the current situation and the report supplied by the care staff, followed by your observations, additional investigations, conclusion and management plan. No fixed national heading structure is imposed here, because the format follows what you actually saw and agreed on that round. Hysio does not add urgency, a new diagnosis or a judgement about the medication. [4] [1] [12]
Only when the conversation is truly about care planning and the patient or an explicit representative takes part. The format sets apart the patient's perspective, the input of the representative and those close to the patient, values, goals and concerns, the information and questions discussed, the wishes, preferences and limits, and the decision status with open points. What is not yet a decision does not become one. Hysio decides nothing about decision-making capacity or representation. [5] [1] [12]
That is what this format is intended for: the short, regular follow-up contact with a resident. Subjective carries the patient's report and the collateral history from the care staff, Objective your own examination, Assessment the working hypothesis you stated and Plan the management plan discussed. SOAP here is not borrowed general practice language but an ordering the profession itself uses, alongside the six domains: somatic, functional, social, mobility, psychological and communicative. [6] [1] [12]
Choose by the contact, not by the topic. Mobility can come up in any format: as functioning and context at admission, as home context at the home visit, as the current situation at the ward round and as an objective finding in the SOAP note. So the question is which contact you had and who was there. Only then does the content of the source determine how full a heading becomes. [1] [2] [12]
You choose an intake when you rebuild the whole picture: at admission, when taking over medical responsibility or at a thorough reassessment. For a follow-up contact that is too heavy. There, what counts is what has changed since last time, and the rest stays where it already was. A planned evaluation of the care plan is a moment of its own and does not turn a follow-up contact into a new intake. [1] [2] [12]
A result comes with which investigation it was, when it was done, who requested it and what literally came out of it. If that leads to a change in the medication, you record the drug, what changes and that you decided it, and that goes under the management plan. The result itself stays under additional investigations. Procedures that belong to another report type, such as a separate medication review, stay out of it. [1] [2] [12]
What the recipient needs to be able to act tonight or tomorrow: the current situation, what recently changed, which agreements are in place about treatment and management, and who the contact person or representative is. You copy a cognitive diagnosis or score as it stands in the record, with the date. A handover is a report type of its own; a ward round or intake report does not turn itself into a letter. [1] [2] [12]
Label each line with who was speaking. The patient, someone close to them, the care staff, the general practitioner and you yourself are five different sources, and the format keeps them apart under participants and source roles. A daughter who comes along is not thereby a representative; that role only appears if the source names it. You record presence, representation and consent separately, because they are three different facts. [1] [2] [12]
Give the collateral history its own paragraph and add the relationship: daughter, partner, carer. What the patient says themselves stays in their own words. If the picture differs, you put both accounts side by side instead of making one story of them. Only include what was discussed in this contact; what you know from an earlier occasion belongs in the past medical history and not in today's history. [1] [12]
Every statement needs its origin. If, by their own account, the patient still walks with a rollator, the care staff report two falls and the physiotherapist saw a laboured transfer, those are three facts with three sources and not one conclusion. Keep your own observation apart from what you have heard. Without that separation, a colleague will not be able to check later what the management plan rested on. [1] [12]
Copy a score as it was supplied: name of the instrument, value, date and who administered it. Think of a Barthel Index, a Katz scale or an observation scale for delirium. Do not calculate anything, do not round anything and do not test a value against a cut-off; that interpretation is your work and you write it in your own words. If the date is missing, the score stays incomplete until you add it. [1] [12]
Put the result under additional investigations, with investigation, date and requester, and put what you do with it under the management plan. A kidney function that calls for a dose adjustment only becomes an adjustment when you state it; until then it is a result. That way, with voice-driven reporting too, it stays visible which part is measurement and which part is judgement, even when a colleague reads the record months later. [1] [12]
No. Images are not read and a report is not reinterpreted. A radiology report comes across as it was supplied, with date and origin, and stays under additional investigations. What that finding means for this patient's cognitive picture is something you state; only then does it go into the conclusion. If the result does not arrive, the text states that no additional investigations have been documented. [11] [10] [12]
Use the terms of your own profession. Collateral history, informal carer, contact person, legal representative and mentor (in the Dutch legal sense) all mean something different and are not synonyms. Avoid language that belongs to another profession, such as regiebehandelaar (coordinating practitioner) or ondersteuningsplan (support plan); here the terms are hoofdbehandelaar (lead practitioner), medebehandelaar (co-practitioner) and consulent (consulting practitioner). Agree within your specialty group which abbreviations you use and write them out in full the first time, so that the care staff also read the report as you intended. [1] [12]
Write down who said it, what they saw and when: the son reports that since last week his mother can no longer get up the stairs. That is an observation by someone close to the patient and not a finding of yours, and the two stay apart. If that person or a referrer then wants to receive information, you first check purpose, role and consent. What you share, you record. [1] [12]
For a meeting, what counts most is who brings in which domain. The care staff describe daily functioning, the physiotherapist mobility, the psychologist behaviour and you the medical line. Write functioning in words that are usable at the table and keep treatment plan, care plan and care and living plan apart, because those are three documents with three owners. Finally, record who picks up which point and when it comes back. [1] [2] [12]
Take a resident who is being checked after a fall. The report states what the care staff saw, what you found on examination, which drugs are on the list and that you are reviewing the sleep medication with the pharmacist. What is not yet a decision remains an intention. Invent no diagnosis, no cause and no outcome, because a case is only instructive when it is accurate. [1] [12] [2]
First determine the purpose and the recipient, because that determines what may go in. A covering doctor at the weekend needs different information from the admitting hospital ward. Include what is on record, with source and date, and leave out the rest. A reader must be able to trace every detail in the record; what is only in your head does not belong in a handover. [11] [9] [12]
No. A delirium, a cognitive disorder or a suspicion of one only appears in the text when you have stated it or when it is demonstrably in the supplied source. Hysio organises what was said and seen; the interpretation stays with the specialist in elderly care medicine. A working hypothesis or differential diagnosis is not added either. If there is no conclusion in the source, the text states that no conclusion was stated. [10] [1] [12]
You. As the treating specialist in elderly care medicine, you decide what goes into the record and in what form. Before saving, read back whether the role of the person close to the patient is right, whether the quote is as it was meant and whether nothing has been merged that should have stayed separate. Hysio does not take over that assessment and does not deliver text that approves itself. Signing off and responsibility for the record stay with you. [1] [10] [12]
Leave the gap. If nothing was discussed about walking, transfers or fall risk, the fixed line appears there that it is not documented in the supplied source. Copying a value from a previous contact seems helpful, but makes the report incorrect because the date no longer matches. If you still want to know, ask about it and add it with the new point in time noted. [1] [10] [12]
In an acute situation, you act first. Hysio does not weigh urgency, does not set priorities and does not assess whether someone needs to be seen urgently; that judgement is medical and stays with you. Afterwards the ordering does help: what you found, what you did and what you agreed, with time and source noted. With voice-driven admin, even under time pressure, you can read back what your decision rested on. [10] [9] [12]
Only those who have a role in the treatment or have consent for it. The pharmacist and the general practitioner usually fall within the treatment relationship; a family member does not automatically, not even when they are the contact person. A legal representative has a position of their own, and that must be evident from the source and not from presence. Record who may receive what and for what purpose, and then share no more than that. [9] [12] [1]
No. The treatment plan is your work: you formulate the main objective, the problem analysis, the sub-goals and the prioritisation, together with the patient and the team. Hysio puts the management plan you stated under the right heading and leaves the rest empty. Nor is a proposal for medication, day activities or investigations added. Treatment plan, care plan and care and living plan also remain three different documents. [10] [11] [12]
Keep the doubt in the text. If the daughter says her father probably skips his tablets, the word probably stays, because a report may never sound more certain than its source. Record what you do not yet know as an open point, with whom you will check it and when. An honest report with an open question is more useful than a polished report that suggests certainty. [1] [12] [10]
Keep both accounts. If the patient reports that walking is going well while the night shift reports two falls, that is not an error in the text but a difference you want to see. Put them side by side with their origin and date, and only then write down your own judgement. Choosing a middle ground or smoothing over the difference later costs you exactly the information your management plan rested on. [1] [12]
Literally. You copy drug names, strengths, doses, units and measured values as they were supplied, without converting, rounding or adding. With polypharmacy, a seemingly small correction is a real risk. If something does not add up or a unit is missing, it stays as incomplete instead of being resolved automatically. You then assess what the value means for this patient. [1] [12] [10]
Read it back against the source and not against your memory of the conversation. Check the medication lines for drug, dose and date, see whether the source roles are right and whether the conclusion is really yours. Correct what deviates before you save, because after that the text is part of the record. If you approve, you also stand behind what is there, including the lines you skipped. [1] [9] [10] [12]
Agree with your specialty group what a covering doctor needs at a minimum: the current medication, the changes of the past few days, the agreements about treatment and management, and who the contact person is. Put that in a fixed order, so that no one has to search. Also decide who reads the text through before the shift changes. A handover remains a report type of its own and is not a copy of the ward round report. [11] [9] [12] [2]
Three agreements are usually enough. Which headings you use, which terms and abbreviations you share, and who approves a report before it goes into the record. Also agree where the text lands: the medical line in the medical treatment record, the agreements for daily care in the care and living plan. Without that choice, the same observation ends up in the record twice, and slightly differently in two places. [1] [2] [11]
Take one ward and one type of contact, for example the conversation with the family after admission. Run it for fourteen days, collect the corrections you make and look at where they come from: the source, the ordering or your own way of dictating. Discuss those first weeks of voice-driven reporting with two colleagues. Only when the collateral history comes back recognisably and correctly do you extend to other contacts. [8] [9] [1]
Put the format next to the headings your institution uses and see where they differ. Usually that is a matter of order and naming, not of content. Keep the separation between source, finding and management plan intact, because that makes the report traceable. Also check who has which authorisation, because a text that no one is allowed to save is not a report. Record the choice made in writing. [11] [1] [12]
For each piece of information, say who it comes from: the client, the informal carer or the primary carer on the ward. Hysio keeps those sources apart in the report. In a family meeting, the agreements stay separate from what the family said. You decide what goes into the record. [1] [12] [2]
Measure your own practice instead of adopting a promise. For one week, time per type of contact how long you spend from conversation to saved report, including reading through and correcting. Compare that with a comparable week before. Count the corrections too, because a text you have to adjust three times gains you nothing. A gain you have not measured yourself is no gain. [1] [11] [8]
The free trial lasts fourteen days, you do not need a credit card for it and you can cancel monthly; the current terms are on the pricing page. Use those two weeks on real contacts and not on an invented case, because only then do you see whether the collateral history and the observations about functioning are accurate. Do work within your institution's agreements on the processing of patient data. [8] [7] [9]
Spread your questions across four places. The pricing page gives the rates and the free trial, the privacy policy describes the processing of data, the legal information carries the terms and the disclaimer sets out what Hysio does not do. What someone close to the patient may hear and what you record in the record also follow from your professional standards and your institution's policy. Those two lines do not replace each other. [7] [9] [10]
Make one list per specialty group and keep it short. Include which abbreviations you use for transfers, walking aids and fall risk, and write them out in full the first time they are used. Also include which words you deliberately do not use because they belong to another profession. Share the list with the care staff, because they read along. If something changes, update the list before the reports start to diverge. [1] [11] [12]
First break the case down into contacts and sources: who spoke when, and what was supplied? Then go through the domains, from somatic and functional to social, mobility, psychological and communicative. That way, even with multimorbidity, it stays visible where each problem belongs. Write the conclusion and management plan last, in one go, and do not let the text draw connections you have not stated. [1] [12] [2] [10]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.