Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Surgery
AI Voice-Driven Reporting for surgeons
From outpatient consultation to procedure dictation and postoperative follow-up: the surgical documentation format organises what the surgeon says, keeping indication, findings and plan apart.
Spoken care information from your care encounter
Surgery
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
You work. Hysio documents.
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
AI assistants
Suited to your work.
- Hysio Surgical Consultation
- Hysio Surgical Preoperative Intake
- Hysio Surgical Postoperative Follow-up
- Hysio Surgical Procedure Report
- Hysio Surgical SOAP Note
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
How Hysio fits into your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
-
You document the conversation
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
-
Hysio creates your report
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
-
You review and copy the report
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Experience what Hysio can mean for your work.
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
- No credit card needed
- Cancel any month
- GDPR-compliant, data hosted in the EU
Profession
Hysio Surgery
For your team
Share with a colleague
Quick answer Documentation for each surgical encounter 50 questions with cited sources
Quick answer
Documentation for surgery
Profession-specific structure for the surgical pathway around consultation, procedure, follow-up and progress notes, with source, findings, results and plan each in their own place.
Here you can see how Hysio works in an outpatient consultation, a preoperative conversation, a procedure, a follow-up or the progress notes during admission.
- What is voice-driven reporting for surgeons?
- Voice-driven reporting, internationally often called an AI scribe and in the Netherlands also known as AI documentation, turns your words about the indication for surgery into a surgical consultation report. For surgery there are five documentation formats: Surgical Consultation, Surgical Preoperative Intake, Surgical Postoperative Follow-up, Surgical Procedure Report and Surgical SOAP Note. The procedure dictation straight after the operation also fits here. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
- What stays tied to the source?
- History and indication for surgery stay separate from supplied results and from what the patient says. Your assessment and the agreements are included as you dictate them. [1] [12]
- Who determines the content?
- You, as the surgeon. You review indication, procedure and management plan before the report goes into the record. [1] [10]
- Profile code 032
- Documentation formats 5 profession-specific documentation formats: Hysio Surgical Consultation, Hysio Surgical Preoperative Intake, Hysio Surgical Postoperative Follow-up, Hysio Surgical Procedure Report, Hysio Surgical SOAP Note.
- Source focus the perioperative pathway and the operative reporting line
- Record boundary you sign off what goes into the record after the procedure
Voice-driven reporting in surgery
Which documentation format fits wound status as the reason for the visit? #
Wound status as the reason for the visit belongs in the Surgical Consultation: the complaint, the examination of the wound and the plan each get their own place there. If the wound follows a recent procedure, the Surgical Postoperative Follow-up fits, because that format also carries the operative context and the course. If it comes up during the admission, the wound description lands in the progress note entry. Hysio does not choose that format for you; you decide which encounter you record. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [1] [12]
How do the indication for surgery and the preoperative assessment each get their own place? #
Keep the indication and the preoperative assessment separate. The indication for surgery is the reason you operate and belongs with the conclusion of the consultation or the intake. The preoperative assessment gathers the medical history, co-treatment and what was discussed with the patient. A procedure name that is mentioned is not yet an indication, so only write down what you actually said. That way the record shows which part is a decision and which part is a finding. [2] [1] [11]
Where does the operative report go in the record? #
The procedure report starts with the dictation directly after the procedure. Reason for the procedure, surgeons and participants, procedure performed, findings, particulars or complications, conclusion and postoperative care each come under their own heading, in the words you spoke. Identification details, coding and sign-off stay outside that text; they belong in the hospital record itself. You read the report back and only then transfer it to the record. [11] [1] [2]
How do you handle information from the preoperative assessment with care? #
Limit the preoperative assessment to what this encounter needs. You only record social context and expectations when they were discussed in the conversation and matter for the procedure. Information about third parties, and information you hear from a relative, gets its source role. What you share with a referrer or co-treating professional, you share with a purpose and with recorded consent. A retention period of twenty years applies to the medical record. [9] [12] [1]
Does Hysio charge per operation for voice-driven reporting? #
A subscription costs €20 per month excl. VAT for Starter, €40 for Pro and €80 for Unlimited; if you pay annually, you get two months free. The price does not depend on the type of report, so recording a pathology result falls within the same subscription. What the price does not change are the boundaries: the pathologist remains the source of the result and you assess what that result means for this patient. [7] [8]
When do you work with your own template for wound status? #
Your own template fits when your wound description is short and tight and your department has relied on it for years: you type a fixed line about appearance, wound edges and dressing in no time. A spoken format only adds value once your explanation is longer than that line, or once several sources run together. Compare both routes over one working day and see which keeps wound status most traceable. [1] [11] [12]
How can you tell whether the indication for surgery matches what was said? #
Read the recorded indication back next to your own dictation and ask yourself whether that sentence was really spoken that way. A procedure that is mentioned, a referral letter or an option that was discussed is not an indication; only your spoken conclusion is. If it is missing, there should be no indication in the text. A fixed format does not automatically make a report correct, so the read-back check remains your step. [1] [12] [10]
How does the operative report differ from a conversation with the patient? #
Dictate the procedure report after the procedure and not during the conversation with the patient or the family. In the consultation itself you do not need to type along: at the end you summarise aloud what you found, what you propose and what was agreed, and that is the source straight away. The patient therefore hears what goes into the record. You do the read-back afterwards. [1] [2] [11]
What makes voice-driven reporting with Hysio different for a preoperative assessment? #
The difference lies in the source binding. The preoperative intake gets fixed places for medical history, history of the presenting complaint and social history, expectations, examination, conclusion and plan, and those places stay empty when the conversation said nothing about them. No risk class is calculated, no surgical plan is filled in and no estimate is added. Your own notes stand apart and are a question, never a clinical proposal. What remains is your assessment, written down in an orderly way. [1] [2] [11]
How do you start with Hysio when discussing a pathology result? #
Start with one results conversation in which you discuss the result with the patient and state your conclusion and plan aloud. The pathology report provided keeps its own source line in the text and stays separate from your conclusion. Agree within the team who reads the first report and where you collect corrections. Only once those two agreements are in place does it make sense to expand to more encounters. [8] [9] [1]
Documentation formats for surgeons
Does Hysio Surgical Consultation fit an outpatient, telephone or digital surgical consultation? #
The Surgical Consultation is the format for the outpatient, telephone or digital consultation: reason for the visit, medical history, history of the presenting complaint, physical examination, additional investigations, conclusion and plan. For the extended conversation before a procedure there is a separate preoperative intake, for the procedure itself a procedure report and for the follow-up afterwards a format of its own. So choose by type of encounter. The conclusion remains the surgeon's, and you do the saving. [2] [1] [12]
Does Hysio Surgical Preoperative Intake fit the conversation before a planned procedure? #
Yes, for the conversation before a planned procedure this is the appropriate format. Alongside the request for care, history and examination, the intake has room for active diagnoses, social history and the patient's expectations; those parts disappear when the conversation said nothing about them. The section with your own notes stands apart from the report and contains at most a verifiable question. Other formats apply to the procedure and the follow-up afterwards. [3] [1] [12]
Does Hysio Surgical Postoperative Follow-up fit the follow-up after a surgical procedure? #
This format belongs with the follow-up after a procedure, not with the conversation beforehand. Alongside reason for the visit, examination, conclusion and plan, it carries two parts of its own: operative context with only the explicitly mentioned procedure, side and date, and the current course. Silence about complications is never turned into "uncomplicated" or "stable"; what was not said stays unmentioned. Discharge letter and handover fall outside this format. [4] [1] [12]
Does Hysio Surgical Procedure Report fit the dictation after a surgical procedure? #
The Procedure Report belongs with the procedure itself and follows your dictation afterwards. Reason for the procedure, surgeons and participants, procedure performed, findings, particulars or complications, conclusion and postoperative care are kept apart. The attribution stays in place: who operated, who assisted and who observed remains visible and is not summarised as the surgeon. Blood loss, duration, materials and side only appear in the text when you mentioned them. For the conversation beforehand or the follow-up afterwards, you choose a different format. [5] [1] [12]
Does Hysio Surgical SOAP Note fit the progress notes during an admission? #
The SOAP Note is the progress note entry during the admission, not the letter to the referrer. Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan organise the daily progress notes after a procedure, briefly and in your own words. There is no established professional format for surgical progress notes, so this structure is a choice made by Hysio and not a standard of the profession. For the outpatient encounter or the follow-up after discharge, the letter formats apply. [6] [1] [12]
Which format fits a pathology result: preoperative conversation, procedure or follow-up? #
Let the type of encounter decide, not the result. If the pathology result comes up in the conversation before the procedure, it belongs with the preoperative intake. If you mention it during the dictation after the procedure, it goes under additional investigations in the procedure report. If you discuss it at the follow-up, it belongs in that format. Everywhere, the result keeps its own source line, separate from your conclusion. [1] [2] [12]
When do you choose an intake for a wound problem? #
Rarely. An intake describes a starting point: the extended conversation before a planned procedure, with medical history, expectations and plan. A wound you are following is by definition a follow-up and belongs in a consultation, a follow-up or the progress note entry during the admission. Only when a patient comes to you as a new patient with a wound and a procedure is on the table does the intake open the line. Each subsequent encounter then describes the change. [1] [2] [12]
What do you note about the indication for surgery after a results discussion? #
After a result, the indication should only contain what you concluded aloud: the condition as you name it, the reason to operate and the procedure you propose. The result itself stays under additional investigations, with its source. Add no stage, no classification and no number that was not spoken. If your conclusion is missing, that place stays empty instead of being filled in. [1] [2] [12]
What does a colleague need to know from the operative report? #
A handover at a shift change leans on the procedure report, but is not the same document. You pass on the procedure with date and side as recorded, the intraoperative findings, the complication status and the agreed postoperative care. What was not mentioned, you do not pass on as reassurance either. A report is not turned into a handover letter; the recipient must be able to trace every line back to the source it came from. [1] [2] [12]
How do you keep the preoperative assessment apart from what others supplied? #
Give each layer its own role. What the patient tells you is history, what you see and feel is examination, what a radiologist or pathologist provides goes under additional investigations with its own conclusion line, and what you make of it is your conclusion. A referral letter remains a referral letter. Keeping those layers apart means it stays readable later what your decision was based on. [1] [2] [12]
Indication, wound and pathology
Does the preoperative assessment belong in the history? #
Write the history in the patient's words and keep it separate from your own judgement. Course of the complaint, previous procedures and scars, comorbidity and medication use mentioned, and what the patient expects from the procedure: that is the history part. Your preoperative judgement belongs with the conclusion. What was not discussed stays empty; a question you did not ask must not become a negative answer. [1] [12]
Where do you note who supplied the pathology result? #
Record who provided the result. A pathology report comes from the pathologist and keeps its own conclusion line; a result that the patient or a relative recounts goes in the history as recounted information. If you heard it in a multidisciplinary team meeting, that is the source. The role determines how much weight the line carries later, so it belongs in the report and not only in your head. [1] [12]
How do you record wound status with the date of assessment? #
Describe the wound with the date and time: size as measured, appearance of the wound edges, redness, swelling, wound fluid or pus, and the condition of sutures or staples. Without a second measurement point, no change can be written down, so always state what you are comparing with. No difference is calculated and no severity grade is assigned; that judgement is and remains your assessment. [1] [12]
How do you link the indication for surgery to the result that supports it? #
Put the result and the decision on two separate lines. The result gets the investigation, date and source; the decision to operate gets your wording and the reason behind it. You state the link between the two yourself; no indication is derived from an abnormal result. That way it remains readable afterwards that the decision came from you and did not simply follow from the result. [1] [12]
Does Hysio assess X-ray or CT images before an operation? #
No. A report provided from an ultrasound, X-ray or scan is taken over as provided, with the radiologist's conclusion as its own line within additional investigations. Hysio does not look at images, does not reread a report and does not draw its own conclusion from it. What you make of the imaging belongs in your conclusion, and you state that conclusion yourself. [11] [10] [12]
Which terms do you use in the preoperative assessment, such as ASA? #
Use the term your department uses and keep it consistent. Surgery has no nationally prescribed vocabulary for the preoperative phase, so the agreement is local: preoperative screening, preoperative consultation and preoperative intake exist side by side. Record which term you use and which abbreviations you write out. You only adopt a term from a neighbouring specialty as a source term, stating who used it. [1] [12]
How do you note a pathology result that a relative relays? #
Write down who told you and in what words. A result that a partner or child recounts is recounted information and not a laboratory source; record it as such and request the original report before you base a decision on it. Do not share anything back with the relative without the patient's consent, and record that consent separately. The source role is in the report, not only in the conversation. [1] [12]
What do you share with the team about the wound? #
The team reads less than you write. It must be visible which procedure and which date the wound belongs to, what the wound looks like now, what has changed since the previous moment, who determined the plan and what the next step is. Nursing observations keep their own source. What the team does not need is your whole dictation; a progress note entry is enough and the rest stays in the report. [1] [2] [12]
Which case best shows how you record an indication for surgery? #
A recognisable case is an adult with a symptomatic inguinal hernia: complaint and course in the history, the swelling on physical examination, your conclusion that there is an indication for surgery and the plan you agree with the patient. The decision is in the conclusion, the reason for it in the findings. An example like this shows how voice-driven admin organises things; it is not medical advice for a real patient. [1] [12] [2]
What do you put in a handover after the operation? #
First decide who the handover is for. The colleague taking over the shift wants procedure, course, complication status and what needs to happen tonight; the GP wants the conclusion and the aftercare. Include the source for each line, so the recipient can trace where something comes from. Do not fill in a missing detail to round off a handover, because an empty field is information too. [11] [9] [12]
Sources, privacy and boundaries around the operation
Does Hysio draw a diagnostic conclusion from the operative report? #
No. Hysio organises what you dictated and on its own establishes no diagnosis, no indication for surgery and no urgency. A procedure name that is mentioned is not converted into an indication and an abnormal finding is not converted into a conclusion. Where you did not state a conclusion, the conclusion line remains with the fixed sentence that there is no conclusion in the source provided. The diagnosis remains your professional judgement as a surgeon. [10] [1] [12]
Who reviews the preoperative assessment before saving? #
You, as the treating surgeon. If a surgical trainee, physician assistant or nurse practitioner writes up the conversation, the supervision remains stated and the responsible doctor signs. Hysio provides a report that you check and does not take over responsibility for the record; saving to the hospital record is done by an authorised professional. Once you have saved it, the text in the record is yours. [1] [10] [12]
What do you note if the pathology result has not come in yet? #
Leave the gap. If the result is missing, no date, no value and no provisional conclusion is put in its place; the format inserts a fixed sentence that the information is not in the source provided. Do record what you requested, from whom and when you expect that result. An empty field that stays recognisable as empty is safer than a filled-in field that nobody can verify. [1] [10] [12]
Do you use Hysio in an acute wound situation? #
With an acute wound, care comes first, not the report. Hysio does not triage, does not determine urgency and does not assess a wound; assessing bleeding, infection or impending ischaemia is your action and that of the team. Only afterwards do you record what you saw, what you did and what you decided. In the acute phase a short progress note entry is often enough, followed by the full report. [10] [9] [12]
With whom may you share the indication for surgery? #
Those directly involved in the treatment may read along: the co-treating professionals within your team and the referrer to whom the patient returns. For everyone outside that, including a relative, the patient's consent is needed, and you record it with the purpose and recipient. Do not share more than what was asked for. Hysio sends nothing itself; sharing is an action you carry out from the record. [9] [12] [1]
Does Hysio write a treatment plan based on the operative report? #
No plan is written. The plan in the report is the plan you stated, and nothing is added in the form of a logical next step. No surgical proposal, no change in medication, no follow-up interval that was not mentioned. An option that was discussed remains an option and does not become a decision. If you did not state a plan, there is a fixed sentence that there is no plan in the source provided. [10] [11] [12]
How does doubt in the preoperative assessment stay visible in the report? #
Let doubt remain doubt. Write down what you are considering and why, in the words you used: possibly, probably, still unclear. A hesitation is not made more definite and no hedge is added that you did not make. Open questions belong visibly in the text, together with what you agreed to answer them. That way a colleague later does not read more certainty than there was. [1] [12] [10]
How do you deal with sources that differ on the pathology? #
If two sources contradict each other, keep both. A referral letter that says something different from the pathology report, or a patient who remembers a different result than the one recorded, produces two lines, each with its own origin. No choice is made about which source wins and no middle ground is created. You weigh them and write your judgement in the conclusion, so the difference stays visible. [1] [12]
How do you note wound care and medication side by side? #
Record both verbatim. A medicine that is mentioned comes back as you said it, and a medication plan only when you set it as the plan; no medication list is created, no name or dose is normalised and nothing is suggested. Measurements around the wound get their value, unit and measurement point. Sections such as allergies, adverse effects or treatment restrictions belong in the hospital record and stay outside this report. [1] [12] [10]
How do you read back the indication for surgery before saving? #
Check three things. First, whether the indication is there as you stated it and not stronger. Second, whether the link with date, side and the procedure mentioned is correct, because nobody fills in the side for you. Third, whether the source is included for everything you did not observe yourself. Only when those three are right do you transfer the text to the record. [1] [9] [10] [12]
Introduction and daily use
How do you prepare the handover of an indication for surgery to a colleague? #
First gather what the receiving colleague needs: why this patient is on the list, which procedure has been agreed, which side has been recorded and what is still open. Say that aloud in one go, instead of in separate sentences throughout the day. Agree who reads the text before it goes into the record. The indication itself does not change through a handover; it remains the operating surgeon's conclusion. [11] [9] [12] [2]
Which team agreement do you make about the operative report? #
Agree three things with your surgical department. Which headings you use and in which order, so that every report reads the same. Who reads and signs the dictation when a surgical trainee or physician assistant wrote it up. And how you handle a report that is still waiting for a result. Without those agreements you end up with as many variants as there are surgeons. [1] [2] [11]
How do you start with a small trial around the preoperative assessment? #
A defined assessment of the report structure covers one clinic session and one format. The assessment points are that morning's preoperative conversations, the same intake layout, a summary spoken aloud at the end of each conversation and comparison with what you would normally type. Note for each conversation what you had to change and why. After five to ten encounters you will see whether the pattern holds. Expanding only makes sense once the corrections to the format itself stop. [8] [9] [1]
How do you adapt the report of a pathology result to your department's agreements? #
Check the text against what your department is used to: which heading carries the result, whether the pathology report is taken over in full or only the conclusion line, and who reports the result back to the patient. Those choices are local, because there is no national format requirement for this part of the record. Put the agreement on paper and have a regular colleague read the first report in the new layout. [11] [1] [12]
What does voice-driven reporting do with the dictation after an operation? #
You dictate the procedure note as soon as the procedure is finished, with indication, technique, findings and the agreed follow-up. Hysio puts it into the format of the procedure report, so you do not have to type it up from memory. That is how voice-driven reporting works after theatre. You review it before it goes into the record. [1] [12] [2]
How do you measure how much time recording an indication for surgery takes? #
Measure it yourself, and measure three things: how many minutes you dictate, how many minutes you spend reading back and correcting, and how often you had to fix something. Compare that with a week in which you typed. For surgery, Hysio does not promise a percentage, because no measured figure for administration in this specialty exists. What your own measurement shows is the only number that counts for your department. [1] [11] [8]
Which conditions apply to operative reports during the trial period? #
The free trial lasts fourteen days and does not require a credit card. The subscription terms are on the pricing page. What a trial with a procedure report should show is whether your dictation comes back recognisably: reason for the procedure, procedure performed, findings and postoperative care kept apart, without an added number and without a filled-in side. Judge that on your own material and not on an example. [8] [7] [9]
Where are the pricing and terms for use on the surgical ward? #
The pricing page describes the Hysio subscriptions and the free trial. For a surgical report you do not pay per procedure described or per examination finding. Also read the legal pages for the agreements on data processing and responsibility. How you carry out a preoperative assessment or document an operation follows from your profession and the agreements in your institution, not from the subscription terms. [7] [9] [10]
How do you record your own way of writing pathology results? #
Make a short list of the words that apply in your department and keep it next to the report. Agree whether you call a result a pathology report, pathology result or tissue examination, and write abbreviations out in full at least once. Your words are taken over and not replaced with a synonym. Varying names for the same thing make a record hard to read for whoever takes over the patient later. [1] [11] [12]
How do you keep track of a case with changing wound status? #
Break the case down into encounters. A patient with a wound that does not heal usually has several moments: the procedure, one or more follow-ups, an additional investigation and a consultation with colleagues. Record one report per moment and refer to the previous one instead of writing everything out again. Keep the sources separate: culture result, nursing observation and your assessment. The common thread emerges in the conclusions, not in one long text. [1] [12] [2] [10]
Sources
- 1 Hysio: Beroepsprofiel de heelkunde (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 2 Hysio: Hysio Heelkundig Consult (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 24 augustus 2026` (herzien 25 augustus 2026) Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 3 Hysio: Hysio Heelkundige Preoperatieve Intake (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 24 augustus 2026` (herzien 25 augustus 2026) Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 4 Hysio: Hysio Heelkundige Postoperatieve Controle (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 5 Hysio: Hysio Heelkundig Verrichtingsverslag (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 24 augustus 2026` (herzien 25 augustus 2026) Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 6 Hysio: Hysio Heelkundig SOEP-Verslag (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 26 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 7 Hysio: Actuele Hysio-prijzen (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-26 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 8 Hysio: Actuele proefperiode (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-31 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 9 Hysio: Hysio Privacyverklaring (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 10 Hysio: Hysio Disclaimer (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 11 Hysio: Hysio en medische dossiersystemen (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
- 12 NVvH: Thema Opleiding heelkunde Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 13 NVvH: Thema Kwaliteit Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 14 NVvH: Thema Richtlijnen Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 15 Overheid.nl, wetten.overheid.nl: Wet op de beroepen in de individuele gezondheidszorg (Wet BIG), art. 3, 14, 36 Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 16 KNMG: Herregistratie-eisen medisch specialisten Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 17 KNMG: RGS Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 18 Capaciteitsorgaan: Capaciteitsplan 2027-2030, Kernrapport Medisch en klinisch technologisch specialismen Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 19 DICA (Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing): Homepage Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 20 DICA: Kwaliteitsregistraties Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 21 NZa: Medisch-specialistische zorg, Registreren en declareren Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 22 Federatie Medisch Specialisten (FMS): Homepage Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 23 Capaciteitsorgaan: Homepage Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 24 NVvH: Richtlijn operatieverslag Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 25 Federatie Medisch Specialisten, Richtlijnendatabase: Perioperatief traject Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 26 Richtlijnendatabase: Perioperatief traject, Stap 1: Spreekuur operateur Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 27 Stichting Informatievoorziening Zorg / zorggegevens.nl: Landelijke Heelkundige Complicatie Registratie Document date: 2026-08-04 Accessed on 2026-08-04
- 28 KNMG: Dossier Wet BIG: beroepen en voorbehouden handelingen Document date: 2026-10-31 Accessed on 2026-10-31
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.