Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Vascular Surgery
After a vascular consultation or check-up, you dictate pulses, wound status and vascular history. Hysio turns it into a report, with the CEAP classification as your judgement.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
For arterial and venous vascular problems and vascular surgery, with a dedicated place for pulses, wounds and the follow-up after the procedure.
A vascular surgery consultation, a wound and vascular status or a check-up after surgery: here you can read how Hysio works. The answers follow the five documentation formats of the specialty.
The moment of contact determines the appropriate report structure. Hysio Vascular Surgery Consultation fits an outpatient conversation, Hysio Vascular Surgery Intake and Vascular History a first contact. For an examination dictation, Hysio Vascular Surgery Wound and Vascular Status Dictation is the intended format; after the procedure, Hysio Vascular Surgery Postoperative Follow-up fits. Hysio Vascular Surgery SOAP Note is for a short record entry. So the name of the procedure alone does not determine the documentation format. You state the findings, conclusion and next steps yourself. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [1] [12]
Hysio sets out the endovascular procedure and vascular history with their available origin, and the wound status only becomes final after your check. CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure get fixed headings in the record, so you can quickly find peripheral pulses within the broader peripheral perfusion. This keeps the organisation in vascular surgery consistent, with every item traceable to the original source. [2] [1] [11]
On the record path, Hysio links peripheral pulses to CEAP classification and the encounter in which they were mentioned, while the endovascular procedure always remains your own assessment. The vascular history is placed next to the wound status, and on that path Hysio writes only what the source actually states. This way the vascular history fits your route in the medical record system, provided you check the wound status and the source before you save anything within the peripheral perfusion. That way, every item remains traceable to where it came from. [11] [1] [2]
When making the privacy choice, Hysio records the vascular history and wound status with their origin, and you assess peripheral pulses yourself before they are given a place. CEAP classification is described in the words of the source, next to the endovascular procedure, so that nothing goes further than what was actually said. For CEAP classification, limit the note to what this one encounter needs, and record consent for the endovascular procedure separately, apart from the rest of the record. This keeps the vascular history linked to CEAP classification, while the wound status keeps its own traceable origin. [9] [18] [1]
The price of Hysio is not listed separately per topic: you can find it on the central pricing page, regardless of whether it concerns CEAP classification, an endovascular procedure or peripheral pulses. So you pay one rate per subscription, even when CEAP classification and an endovascular procedure come together in the same encounter. [7] [8]
Your own template for an endovascular procedure can sometimes fit better than the standard format, for example when your practice already uses a fixed way of working around CEAP classification. In that case, compare your own route with what Hysio provides, and keep the vascular history traceable within the peripheral perfusion. Wound status and peripheral pulses still stay side by side, with CEAP classification linked to its origin in this specific encounter. This way you decide yourself when your own template adds value, without the endovascular procedure losing its traceability. [1] [11] [12]
During the source check, Hysio records the endovascular procedure and vascular history with their origin, and the wound status only gets a final place after your check. Peripheral pulses come first, and the check continues with CEAP classification and the corresponding source. For peripheral pulses, always compare the report and the dictation with the original source of the findings, because a fixed format does not automatically make the peripheral perfusion correct. That check remains yours: Hysio provides the structure, you assess whether the content is right. [1] [12] [10]
During the patient encounter, Hysio links peripheral pulses to CEAP classification and the conversation in which they came up, while the endovascular procedure remains your own assessment. The vascular history is placed next to the wound status, and Hysio writes only what the patient or the source actually states. For the vascular history, always focus on what the patient needs, and check the wound status before you finalise the note for the peripheral perfusion. This keeps the attention on the conversation itself, and the record serves that conversation rather than the other way round. [1] [2] [11]
The difference lies in the division of roles: Hysio organises CEAP classification and links every item to the source, while you assess the endovascular procedure and decide what is useful for the peripheral perfusion. The vascular history and wound status are placed side by side, with their origin visible instead of hidden in running text. CEAP classification is described in the words of the source itself, next to the endovascular procedure, without Hysio adding an interpretation of its own. This keeps the medical assessment with you, and Hysio only takes over the organising and making things traceable. [1] [2] [11]
Start small: work from the wound status and place CEAP classification next to the endovascular procedure in a recognisable encounter, without immediately trying to record the entire history. You assess the vascular history only when that specific encounter gives reason to, and from there you connect the wound status with peripheral pulses and the corresponding source. Agree within your team who checks peripheral pulses before you use Hysio more widely for reporting on peripheral perfusion. This way the approach grows with what your practice actually needs, instead of covering everything all at once. [8] [9] [1]
Hysio Vascular Surgery Consultation is intended for an outpatient, telephone or digital care encounter in which you discuss findings, conclusion and management plan. The format organises, among other things, the reason for the visit, history, examination and the agreed follow-up. With voice-driven reporting, only information from the encounter is given a place. A CEAP classification that is mentioned remains your assessment; Hysio does not derive a class, diagnosis or indication for surgery from separate findings. [2] [1] [12]
The intake fits a first contact in which you discuss the request for help, medical history, vascular history and relevant context together. Examination, your conclusion and the plan stay separately recognisable. This distinguishes the intake from a separate wound or vascular status dictation, which does not assume a full history. Hysio does not fill in missing medical history or risk factors itself; you check the text and decide the next steps. [3] [1] [12]
The Wound and Vascular Status Dictation is intended for a focused examination that you dictate. The reason, wound description, vascular status and stated conclusion are central. This format has no separate full history, because an examination dictation does not automatically contain the information needed for it. Include side, measured values and units as they were mentioned. A classification or interpretation only appears if you actually stated it. [4] [1] [12]
The Postoperative Follow-up is intended for an encounter after a vascular surgery procedure. The surgical context, the recovery discussed, current findings, your assessment and follow-up agreements each get a recognisable place. Hysio does not fill in any change that does not follow from the encounter. This format is a follow-up report for your own record, not a handover to another institution. A handover request therefore needs a separate write-up. [5] [1] [12]
The Vascular Surgery SOAP Note fits a short record entry about a follow-up encounter or an encounter during admission. What the patient says goes under Subjective, examination findings under Objective, your interpretation under Assessment and the agreements under Plan. Include only what was discussed for that encounter. A short progress note entry does not call for a new full intake and does not automatically become a letter to a referrer. [6] [1] [12]
For a focused dictation of a wound and vascular examination, the Wound and Vascular Status Dictation fits. If you discuss the wound within a broader outpatient encounter, the Vascular Surgery Consultation may fit better. If it concerns recovery after a procedure, the Postoperative Follow-up is the intended format. What decides is the purpose of the encounter, not the mere appearance of the words wound status in your dictation. [1] [2] [12]
An intake fits when it concerns the first, broad conversation in which you discuss the request for help, medical history, vascular history, examination and plan. The fact that an endovascular procedure is mentioned for the first time is not in itself a reason for an intake. For a focused follow-up encounter, the consultation or a short SOAP note fits; for assessing recovery after the procedure, the Postoperative Follow-up. [1] [2] [12]
Record the examined location, side and finding as they were named during the examination. Keep the observation separate from your interpretation and state a measured value with its unit when it was mentioned. A missing finding is not filled in as normal. Hysio does not derive a classification, severity or treatment choice from peripheral pulses. You assess the examination within the clinical context. [1] [2] [12]
Include only the history details the recipient needs for the next steps. State who provided the information, when it applied, which assessment you made and which question or agreement is still open. Check the legal basis and destination before you share data. A postoperative follow-up for your own record is not yet a handover; the recipient and the purpose of the handover call for a separate assessment. [1] [2] [12]
A CEAP classification is a professional categorisation, not a source person. Note the class named by the vascular surgeon separately from what the patient says and what was observed during examination. State side and moment when they are in the source. Hysio does not calculate a class from separate symptoms or findings and does not fill in a missing classification. You check whether the categorisation and context are represented correctly. [1] [2] [12]
In the history, you describe CEAP classification from the reason for the visit: the vascular history is placed next to the wound status, and peripheral pulses get their own origin from the encounter. Record the request for help and course in the words of the source itself, and add CEAP classification only when it was actually discussed during this consultation, this vascular status or follow-up. This keeps the history a reflection of the conversation, not of what is missing. [1] [12]
You record who provided the wound status through the source role: CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure get their own origin, and you check the text about the vascular history before saving. Note explicitly who provided the wound status, patient, relative or referrer, and keep that separate from your own observation, so that peripheral pulses stay traceable within the peripheral perfusion. This way you can later still see exactly who contributed which part of the story. [1] [18] [12]
An endovascular procedure is not itself a measured value: you note the type of procedure, the date and the source, while the wound status is linked to peripheral pulses and the encounter. For a measured value that was actually provided, you do note the instrument, the unit and the time of measurement itself, and CEAP classification remains your own assessment. Hysio records the measurement as it was carried out; you decide what it means professionally within the peripheral perfusion. This keeps an endovascular procedure an event with a date and source, and a measured value a number, until you attach a clinical conclusion to it. [1] [12]
You link peripheral pulses to the examination, date and source, and you check the wound status before saving. With voice-driven admin, you describe peripheral pulses in the words of the source, next to the CEAP classification. Give your own assessment of the CEAP classification a separate place within the peripheral perfusion, apart from the raw result. This keeps fact and interpretation distinguishable in the record. [1] [12] [18]
No, Hysio does not assess images itself: for imaging, Hysio uses the report provided around the vascular history, while peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin. You assess the endovascular procedure yourself, and the vascular history is described in the words of the source, next to the wound status. The source remains decisive for the peripheral perfusion; Hysio does not add a radiological interpretation of its own. This way you get the report back in a clear overview, without the medical assessment shifting. [11] [10] [12]
Include the CEAP classification as the vascular surgeon named it, with the class and the side when they were stated. Keep the classification separate from individual examination findings, such as the wound status or peripheral pulses. Hysio does not assign a class itself and does not calculate a classification from a description. If the class is missing from the source, it stays open for your assessment. [1] [12]
State who provided the information and when. A relative may, for example, talk about the course of a wound or the symptoms at home; that stays distinct from what the patient says and what the vascular surgeon examines. Do not write down a reported change as your own examination finding. Before sharing data, check which information the recipient needs and on what basis you may share it. [1] [18] [12]
For a team meeting, everyone mainly needs to see who provided the endovascular procedure and who takes on the follow-up: the wound status is linked to peripheral pulses and the encounter, while CEAP classification remains your own assessment. The endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, with no more than what the source indicates. Make visible which discipline contributed which item, and keep the vascular history within the peripheral perfusion understandable for colleagues outside vascular surgery. This way the report also works in a multidisciplinary setting, without jargon getting in the way of communication. [1] [2] [18]
A good example case around peripheral pulses shows a real encounter, with the course and follow-up as they actually happened, without an invented diagnosis. In it, the endovascular procedure is linked to the vascular history and the encounter, while the wound status remains your own assessment. Peripheral pulses sit next to CEAP classification, with only what the source of that case states. This keeps an example recognisable for colleagues, without it growing into a fictional patient history. [1] [12] [2]
You prepare a handover about the vascular history by limiting it to source and purpose, not to everything that was ever recorded: peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin, and you assess the endovascular procedure yourself. The vascular history is described in the words of the source, next to the wound status. Let the recipient of the handover trace the wound status within the peripheral perfusion themselves, instead of repeating every detail in advance. This keeps a handover compact and still fully traceable. [11] [9] [18] [12]
No, Hysio does not make a diagnosis based on the vascular history: for the diagnostic question, Hysio organises what was provided, while peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin and you assess the endovascular procedure. Hysio adds structure but does not make a diagnosis or indication; you as the vascular surgeon determine the meaning within the peripheral perfusion. That medical responsibility does not shift, however clear the record becomes. [10] [1] [12]
You check the CEAP classification before it is saved: that remains part of your professional responsibility, as does linking the vascular history to the wound status and the encounter. You also assess peripheral pulses yourself, while CEAP classification is placed next to the endovascular procedure with only what the source states. You choose the final record content and assess the CEAP classification; Hysio does not take over that professional decision anywhere. This keeps final responsibility exactly where it belongs: with the vascular surgeon. [1] [10] [18]
If the wound status is missing, mark it explicitly as missing or not discussed, instead of inventing something: CEAP classification meanwhile keeps its own origin, as does the endovascular procedure, and you assess the vascular history yourself. Wound status is described in the words of the source, next to peripheral pulses, insofar as it exists. Do not add any date, value or conclusion for the peripheral perfusion that the source does not support. This keeps a gap visible as a gap, not as information that was silently filled in. [1] [10] [12]
No, do not use Hysio for triage around an endovascular procedure: in an acute situation, the medical assessment always comes first, and only then do you record the vascular history tied to the source. Wound status sits next to peripheral pulses, and you assess CEAP classification only when the encounter gives reason to. This keeps Hysio a tool for documentation, not for emergency decisions. [10] [9] [12]
Who may receive information about peripheral pulses is determined by the consent agreed for it: always check purpose, consent and recipient before you share anything. The endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, and you check the text about the wound status before saving. Within the peripheral perfusion, note only what was actually agreed, not what seemed implicitly permitted. [9] [18] [1]
No, Hysio does not itself make a treatment plan around the vascular history: it places that information clearly under a heading, while peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin and you assess the endovascular procedure. Hysio does not choose a treatment or an operation; you as the vascular surgeon oversee the peripheral perfusion and the choices within it. That boundary does not change, not even when the record itself becomes more and more complete. [10] [11] [12]
You note uncertainty about CEAP classification by leaving the doubt visible, instead of writing it away: the vascular history is linked to the wound status and the encounter, while peripheral pulses remain your own assessment. CEAP classification gets a place next to the endovascular procedure, no more than what the source indicates. Do not make the endovascular procedure more definite than the source itself allows, and note the open question explicitly within the peripheral perfusion. This keeps doubt recognisable for everyone who reads the record later. [1] [12] [10]
If sources differ on the wound status, keep both readings side by side instead of choosing one yourself: CEAP classification gets the same origin rule as the endovascular procedure, and you assess the vascular history on your own judgement. Wound status is described in the words of the source, next to peripheral pulses. First note the origin of each reading, and only then assess within the peripheral perfusion which information takes precedence. This way neither version is lost, not even when they contradict each other. [1] [18] [12]
You record medication verbatim as the source states it, including the unit, while the endovascular procedure is recorded as an event with date and type: the wound status sits next to peripheral pulses, and you assess CEAP classification only when the encounter gives reason to. Hysio records the figures as they were provided; you as the vascular surgeon assess what they mean within the peripheral perfusion. This keeps a dosage a fact and a procedure an event, until you make a clinical judgement about it. [1] [12] [10]
Before saving, for peripheral pulses you read the text back next to the source and the date, as a final check on what was actually recorded: the endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, and the wound status is kept with its own origin. Correct any discrepancies in CEAP classification before the peripheral perfusion is saved as final. This way the last look is always yours, not Hysio's. [1] [9] [10] [18]
You prepare a handover about peripheral pulses by first agreeing who will read it: the endovascular procedure and vascular history keep their own origin, and you assess the wound status only within the team. The source provides the exact words for peripheral pulses, next to CEAP classification. Decide which information about CEAP classification the recipient actually needs, and set out the follow-up within the peripheral perfusion separately, apart from the rest of the handover. This keeps the handover concise, without unnecessary details. [11] [9] [18] [2]
For the vascular history you mainly need a team agreement: who approves the final peripheral perfusion. In addition, use fixed headings for the vascular history and shared terms for wound status, so that peripheral pulses and the endovascular procedure stay recognisably next to them. You assess CEAP classification only when the encounter gives reason to. This way everyone in the practice knows who takes the last step before anything becomes final. [1] [2] [11]
First try out voice-driven reporting in one clearly defined contact, for example a clinic session for venous complaints. Collect the corrections on CEAP classification and endovascular procedure before you expand. The vascular history sits next to the wound status, and peripheral pulses are kept with their own origin. Only expand to more contacts once the representation of peripheral perfusion is right within that first trial. [8] [9] [1]
You adapt a report on wound status by checking it against local headings, and peripheral pulses against the authorisations that apply within your practice: CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure meanwhile keep their own origin, and you check the text about the vascular history before saving. Have a designated colleague check the representation of peripheral perfusion before the adjustment applies across the practice. This way the report fits how your team already works, rather than the other way round. [11] [1] [12]
State the access, the treated segment, the material used and the result on the completion imaging. Hysio puts that into the structure of the procedure report. Pulses and wound status afterwards get their own place. You check the report last. [1] [12] [2]
Time saved around peripheral pulses is best measured in your own team: note the time for measuring, checking and corrections, instead of relying on a promised percentage. The endovascular procedure and vascular history keep their own origin, and you assess the wound status yourself. Peripheral pulses carry the wording of the source, as does CEAP classification next to them. Give the peripheral perfusion priority over the clock: a correct note weighs more than a few seconds saved. [1] [11] [8]
The same trial conditions apply to the vascular history as to the rest of Hysio: read those central conditions and use the free trial to assess the report representation of wound status in practice. Peripheral pulses sit next to CEAP classification, and you assess the endovascular procedure only when the encounter gives reason to. This way you test the system on your own cases before you choose a longer period. [8] [7] [9]
The pricing page describes the Hysio plans and the trial conditions. Within Hysio there is no separate price for CEAP classification: it belongs to the content of the report. The privacy policy and the legal overview cover data use and responsibilities on the platform. For the vascular surgery assessment, consult the professional sources and your own working agreements, not the commercial terms. [7] [9] [10]
You record your own terminology around wound status by agreeing within your team how you write wound status, CEAP classification and the related abbreviations, with CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure keeping their own origin and the vascular history only getting a place after your check. Keep the peripheral perfusion understandable for colleagues who work with these terms less often. This prevents your own abbreviations from becoming a barrier outside your own team. [1] [11] [12]
Split a complex case around an endovascular procedure into the separate encounters and sources it is built from, instead of cramming everything into one continuous story: the wound status is linked to peripheral pulses and the encounter, while CEAP classification remains your own assessment. The endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, without adding anything the source does not state. Organise the vascular history, findings and follow-up without adding an extra conclusion that the source itself does not draw. This keeps even a complicated case traceable step by step. [1] [12] [2] [10]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.