Skip to content

Hysio Vascular Surgery

AI Voice-Driven Reporting for vascular surgeons

After a vascular consultation or check-up, you dictate pulses, wound status and vascular history. Hysio turns it into a report, with the CEAP classification as your judgement.

Vascular surgeon reviewing medical imaging at a workstation
Your care encounter stays central, Hysio documents the relevant information.

Spoken care information from your care encounter

Vascular surgery

A structured report in your professional terminology

From care encounter to report

You work. Hysio documents.

Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.

Document

Keep your attention on the care encounter.

Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.

AI assistants

Suited to your work.

  • Hysio Vascular Surgery Consultation
  • Hysio Vascular Surgery Intake and Vascular History
  • Hysio Vascular Surgery Wound and Vascular Status Dictation
  • Hysio Vascular Surgery Postoperative Follow-up
  • Hysio Vascular Surgery SOAP Note

You stay in control of what gets saved.

In your workday

How Hysio fits into your workday

More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.

  1. You document the conversation

    State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.

  2. Hysio creates your report

    The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.

  3. You review and copy the report

    Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.

Try it yourself

Experience what Hysio can mean for your work.

Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.

  • No credit card needed
  • Cancel any month
  • GDPR-compliant, data hosted in the EU
Profession Hysio Vascular Surgery

For your team

Share with a colleague

Send this page to someone you would like to explore Hysio with.

Quick answer Vascular history, wound status and follow-up after the procedure 50 questions with cited sources

Quick answer

Documentation for vascular surgery

For arterial and venous vascular problems and vascular surgery, with a dedicated place for pulses, wounds and the follow-up after the procedure.

A vascular surgery consultation, a wound and vascular status or a check-up after surgery: here you can read how Hysio works. The answers follow the five documentation formats of the specialty.

What does Hysio do after a vascular consultation?
A vascular surgery consultation report without typing: that is voice-driven reporting. You state vascular history, pulses and wound status, and Hysio organises it. Another name is AI documentation. There are five documentation formats: Vascular Surgery Consultation, Vascular Surgery Intake and Vascular History, Vascular Surgery Wound and Vascular Status Dictation, Vascular Surgery Postoperative Follow-up and Vascular Surgery SOAP Note. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
What from the vascular consultation goes into the report?
Vascular history, pulses, ankle-brachial index and wound status, as you mention or supply them. Hysio does not derive a CEAP class. [1] [12]
Who decides on the indication?
You, as the vascular surgeon. You check side, measured values and conclusion before you save the report. [1] [10]
How does the report follow vascular surgery?
The report follows complaints, vascular status, wound, imaging and management plan. An ankle-brachial index is only included when you mention it; the interpretation stays with you. [1] [12] [11]
Where is the line for Hysio?
Hysio does not set an indication for surgery, does not assess a duplex or angiography and does not take an emergency decision. [10] [11]
  • Profile code 056
  • Documentation formats 5 profession-specific documentation formats: Hysio Vascular Surgery Consultation, Hysio Vascular Surgery Intake and Vascular History, Hysio Vascular Surgery Wound and Vascular Status Dictation, Hysio Vascular Surgery Postoperative Follow-up, Hysio Vascular Surgery SOAP Note.
  • Source focus vascular status, wound assessment and perioperative care
  • Record boundary report with side and measured values, judgement with the vascular surgeon

Voice-driven reporting in vascular surgery

Which documentation format fits an encounter around an endovascular procedure? #

The moment of contact determines the appropriate report structure. Hysio Vascular Surgery Consultation fits an outpatient conversation, Hysio Vascular Surgery Intake and Vascular History a first contact. For an examination dictation, Hysio Vascular Surgery Wound and Vascular Status Dictation is the intended format; after the procedure, Hysio Vascular Surgery Postoperative Follow-up fits. Hysio Vascular Surgery SOAP Note is for a short record entry. So the name of the procedure alone does not determine the documentation format. You state the findings, conclusion and next steps yourself. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [1] [12]

How do pulses and the CEAP classification each get their own place? #

Hysio sets out the endovascular procedure and vascular history with their available origin, and the wound status only becomes final after your check. CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure get fixed headings in the record, so you can quickly find peripheral pulses within the broader peripheral perfusion. This keeps the organisation in vascular surgery consistent, with every item traceable to the original source. [2] [1] [11]

How do you document the vascular history? #

On the record path, Hysio links peripheral pulses to CEAP classification and the encounter in which they were mentioned, while the endovascular procedure always remains your own assessment. The vascular history is placed next to the wound status, and on that path Hysio writes only what the source actually states. This way the vascular history fits your route in the medical record system, provided you check the wound status and the source before you save anything within the peripheral perfusion. That way, every item remains traceable to where it came from. [11] [1] [2]

How do you protect information about CEAP classification? #

When making the privacy choice, Hysio records the vascular history and wound status with their origin, and you assess peripheral pulses yourself before they are given a place. CEAP classification is described in the words of the source, next to the endovascular procedure, so that nothing goes further than what was actually said. For CEAP classification, limit the note to what this one encounter needs, and record consent for the endovascular procedure separately, apart from the rest of the record. This keeps the vascular history linked to CEAP classification, while the wound status keeps its own traceable origin. [9] [18] [1]

Does voice-driven reporting cost extra when CEAP and an endovascular procedure come together? #

The price of Hysio is not listed separately per topic: you can find it on the central pricing page, regardless of whether it concerns CEAP classification, an endovascular procedure or peripheral pulses. So you pay one rate per subscription, even when CEAP classification and an endovascular procedure come together in the same encounter. [7] [8]

Would you rather use your own template for endovascular procedures? #

Your own template for an endovascular procedure can sometimes fit better than the standard format, for example when your practice already uses a fixed way of working around CEAP classification. In that case, compare your own route with what Hysio provides, and keep the vascular history traceable within the peripheral perfusion. Wound status and peripheral pulses still stay side by side, with CEAP classification linked to its origin in this specific encounter. This way you decide yourself when your own template adds value, without the endovascular procedure losing its traceability. [1] [11] [12]

How do you check the pulses per leg against your dictation? #

During the source check, Hysio records the endovascular procedure and vascular history with their origin, and the wound status only gets a final place after your check. Peripheral pulses come first, and the check continues with CEAP classification and the corresponding source. For peripheral pulses, always compare the report and the dictation with the original source of the findings, because a fixed format does not automatically make the peripheral perfusion correct. That check remains yours: Hysio provides the structure, you assess whether the content is right. [1] [12] [10]

How do you stay with the client while taking the vascular history? #

During the patient encounter, Hysio links peripheral pulses to CEAP classification and the conversation in which they came up, while the endovascular procedure remains your own assessment. The vascular history is placed next to the wound status, and Hysio writes only what the patient or the source actually states. For the vascular history, always focus on what the patient needs, and check the wound status before you finalise the note for the peripheral perfusion. This keeps the attention on the conversation itself, and the record serves that conversation rather than the other way round. [1] [2] [11]

What does Hysio organise around the CEAP classification, and what do you assess? #

The difference lies in the division of roles: Hysio organises CEAP classification and links every item to the source, while you assess the endovascular procedure and decide what is useful for the peripheral perfusion. The vascular history and wound status are placed side by side, with their origin visible instead of hidden in running text. CEAP classification is described in the words of the source itself, next to the endovascular procedure, without Hysio adding an interpretation of its own. This keeps the medical assessment with you, and Hysio only takes over the organising and making things traceable. [1] [2] [11]

Why do you start with recording the wound status? #

Start small: work from the wound status and place CEAP classification next to the endovascular procedure in a recognisable encounter, without immediately trying to record the entire history. You assess the vascular history only when that specific encounter gives reason to, and from there you connect the wound status with peripheral pulses and the corresponding source. Agree within your team who checks peripheral pulses before you use Hysio more widely for reporting on peripheral perfusion. This way the approach grows with what your practice actually needs, instead of covering everything all at once. [8] [9] [1]

Documentation formats for vascular surgeons

Which report do you use for an outpatient or telephone vascular consultation? #

Hysio Vascular Surgery Consultation is intended for an outpatient, telephone or digital care encounter in which you discuss findings, conclusion and management plan. The format organises, among other things, the reason for the visit, history, examination and the agreed follow-up. With voice-driven reporting, only information from the encounter is given a place. A CEAP classification that is mentioned remains your assessment; Hysio does not derive a class, diagnosis or indication for surgery from separate findings. [2] [1] [12]

When do you discuss the full vascular history in an intake? #

The intake fits a first contact in which you discuss the request for help, medical history, vascular history and relevant context together. Examination, your conclusion and the plan stay separately recognisable. This distinguishes the intake from a separate wound or vascular status dictation, which does not assume a full history. Hysio does not fill in missing medical history or risk factors itself; you check the text and decide the next steps. [3] [1] [12]

How do you dictate a focused wound and vascular status? #

The Wound and Vascular Status Dictation is intended for a focused examination that you dictate. The reason, wound description, vascular status and stated conclusion are central. This format has no separate full history, because an examination dictation does not automatically contain the information needed for it. Include side, measured values and units as they were mentioned. A classification or interpretation only appears if you actually stated it. [4] [1] [12]

What do you record at the check-up after vascular surgery? #

The Postoperative Follow-up is intended for an encounter after a vascular surgery procedure. The surgical context, the recovery discussed, current findings, your assessment and follow-up agreements each get a recognisable place. Hysio does not fill in any change that does not follow from the encounter. This format is a follow-up report for your own record, not a handover to another institution. A handover request therefore needs a separate write-up. [5] [1] [12]

Is a SOAP entry enough after a short follow-up contact? #

The Vascular Surgery SOAP Note fits a short record entry about a follow-up encounter or an encounter during admission. What the patient says goes under Subjective, examination findings under Objective, your interpretation under Assessment and the agreements under Plan. Include only what was discussed for that encounter. A short progress note entry does not call for a new full intake and does not automatically become a letter to a referrer. [6] [1] [12]

Which documentation format do you choose to record a wound status? #

For a focused dictation of a wound and vascular examination, the Wound and Vascular Status Dictation fits. If you discuss the wound within a broader outpatient encounter, the Vascular Surgery Consultation may fit better. If it concerns recovery after a procedure, the Postoperative Follow-up is the intended format. What decides is the purpose of the encounter, not the mere appearance of the words wound status in your dictation. [1] [2] [12]

When does an intake fit a conversation about an endovascular procedure? #

An intake fits when it concerns the first, broad conversation in which you discuss the request for help, medical history, vascular history, examination and plan. The fact that an endovascular procedure is mentioned for the first time is not in itself a reason for an intake. For a focused follow-up encounter, the consultation or a short SOAP note fits; for assessing recovery after the procedure, the Postoperative Follow-up. [1] [2] [12]

How do you include peripheral pulses in an examination report? #

Record the examined location, side and finding as they were named during the examination. Keep the observation separate from your interpretation and state a measured value with its unit when it was mentioned. A missing finding is not filled in as normal. Hysio does not derive a classification, severity or treatment choice from peripheral pulses. You assess the examination within the clinical context. [1] [2] [12]

Which information from the vascular history do you include in a handover? #

Include only the history details the recipient needs for the next steps. State who provided the information, when it applied, which assessment you made and which question or agreement is still open. Check the legal basis and destination before you share data. A postoperative follow-up for your own record is not yet a handover; the recipient and the purpose of the handover call for a separate assessment. [1] [2] [12]

How do you keep a CEAP classification and the underlying findings apart? #

A CEAP classification is a professional categorisation, not a source person. Note the class named by the vascular surgeon separately from what the patient says and what was observed during examination. State side and moment when they are in the source. Hysio does not calculate a class from separate symptoms or findings and does not fill in a missing classification. You check whether the categorisation and context are represented correctly. [1] [2] [12]

Recording vascular status, CEAP and wound

Does the CEAP classification belong in the history or in your assessment? #

In the history, you describe CEAP classification from the reason for the visit: the vascular history is placed next to the wound status, and peripheral pulses get their own origin from the encounter. Record the request for help and course in the words of the source itself, and add CEAP classification only when it was actually discussed during this consultation, this vascular status or follow-up. This keeps the history a reflection of the conversation, not of what is missing. [1] [12]

How can you later see who last assessed the wound? #

You record who provided the wound status through the source role: CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure get their own origin, and you check the text about the vascular history before saving. Note explicitly who provided the wound status, patient, relative or referrer, and keep that separate from your own observation, so that peripheral pulses stay traceable within the peripheral perfusion. This way you can later still see exactly who contributed which part of the story. [1] [18] [12]

How do you note an endovascular procedure with date and source? #

An endovascular procedure is not itself a measured value: you note the type of procedure, the date and the source, while the wound status is linked to peripheral pulses and the encounter. For a measured value that was actually provided, you do note the instrument, the unit and the time of measurement itself, and CEAP classification remains your own assessment. Hysio records the measurement as it was carried out; you decide what it means professionally within the peripheral perfusion. This keeps an endovascular procedure an event with a date and source, and a measured value a number, until you attach a clinical conclusion to it. [1] [12]

How do you link pulses to a duplex or ankle-brachial index? #

You link peripheral pulses to the examination, date and source, and you check the wound status before saving. With voice-driven admin, you describe peripheral pulses in the words of the source, next to the CEAP classification. Give your own assessment of the CEAP classification a separate place within the peripheral perfusion, apart from the raw result. This keeps fact and interpretation distinguishable in the record. [1] [12] [18]

Does Hysio assess images? #

No, Hysio does not assess images itself: for imaging, Hysio uses the report provided around the vascular history, while peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin. You assess the endovascular procedure yourself, and the vascular history is described in the words of the source, next to the wound status. The source remains decisive for the peripheral perfusion; Hysio does not add a radiological interpretation of its own. This way you get the report back in a clear overview, without the medical assessment shifting. [11] [10] [12]

How do you record a CEAP classification in the vascular surgery report? #

Include the CEAP classification as the vascular surgeon named it, with the class and the side when they were stated. Keep the classification separate from individual examination findings, such as the wound status or peripheral pulses. Hysio does not assign a class itself and does not calculate a classification from a description. If the class is missing from the source, it stays open for your assessment. [1] [12]

How do you mention information from a relative in a vascular surgery report? #

State who provided the information and when. A relative may, for example, talk about the course of a wound or the symptoms at home; that stays distinct from what the patient says and what the vascular surgeon examines. Do not write down a reported change as your own examination finding. Before sharing data, check which information the recipient needs and on what basis you may share it. [1] [18] [12]

What should a colleague be able to read back about a planned endovascular procedure? #

For a team meeting, everyone mainly needs to see who provided the endovascular procedure and who takes on the follow-up: the wound status is linked to peripheral pulses and the encounter, while CEAP classification remains your own assessment. The endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, with no more than what the source indicates. Make visible which discipline contributed which item, and keep the vascular history within the peripheral perfusion understandable for colleagues outside vascular surgery. This way the report also works in a multidisciplinary setting, without jargon getting in the way of communication. [1] [2] [18]

What should an example case about peripheral pulses show? #

A good example case around peripheral pulses shows a real encounter, with the course and follow-up as they actually happened, without an invented diagnosis. In it, the endovascular procedure is linked to the vascular history and the encounter, while the wound status remains your own assessment. Peripheral pulses sit next to CEAP classification, with only what the source of that case states. This keeps an example recognisable for colleagues, without it growing into a fictional patient history. [1] [12] [2]

What belongs in a handover about the vascular history? #

You prepare a handover about the vascular history by limiting it to source and purpose, not to everything that was ever recorded: peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin, and you assess the endovascular procedure yourself. The vascular history is described in the words of the source, next to the wound status. Let the recipient of the handover trace the wound status within the peripheral perfusion themselves, instead of repeating every detail in advance. This keeps a handover compact and still fully traceable. [11] [9] [18] [12]

No indication or image reading: the boundaries

Can Hysio infer a diagnosis from the vascular history? #

No, Hysio does not make a diagnosis based on the vascular history: for the diagnostic question, Hysio organises what was provided, while peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin and you assess the endovascular procedure. Hysio adds structure but does not make a diagnosis or indication; you as the vascular surgeon determine the meaning within the peripheral perfusion. That medical responsibility does not shift, however clear the record becomes. [10] [1] [12]

Who checks the CEAP classification before you save? #

You check the CEAP classification before it is saved: that remains part of your professional responsibility, as does linking the vascular history to the wound status and the encounter. You also assess peripheral pulses yourself, while CEAP classification is placed next to the endovascular procedure with only what the source states. You choose the final record content and assess the CEAP classification; Hysio does not take over that professional decision anywhere. This keeps final responsibility exactly where it belongs: with the vascular surgeon. [1] [10] [18]

What do you note if the wound status was not assessed? #

If the wound status is missing, mark it explicitly as missing or not discussed, instead of inventing something: CEAP classification meanwhile keeps its own origin, as does the endovascular procedure, and you assess the vascular history yourself. Wound status is described in the words of the source, next to peripheral pulses, insofar as it exists. Do not add any date, value or conclusion for the peripheral perfusion that the source does not support. This keeps a gap visible as a gap, not as information that was silently filled in. [1] [10] [12]

Is Hysio meant for use in acute ischaemia? #

No, do not use Hysio for triage around an endovascular procedure: in an acute situation, the medical assessment always comes first, and only then do you record the vascular history tied to the source. Wound status sits next to peripheral pulses, and you assess CEAP classification only when the encounter gives reason to. This keeps Hysio a tool for documentation, not for emergency decisions. [10] [9] [12]

With whom may you share information about pulses? #

Who may receive information about peripheral pulses is determined by the consent agreed for it: always check purpose, consent and recipient before you share anything. The endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, and you check the text about the wound status before saving. Within the peripheral perfusion, note only what was actually agreed, not what seemed implicitly permitted. [9] [18] [1]

Does Hysio choose a treatment based on the vascular history? #

No, Hysio does not itself make a treatment plan around the vascular history: it places that information clearly under a heading, while peripheral pulses and CEAP classification keep their own origin and you assess the endovascular procedure. Hysio does not choose a treatment or an operation; you as the vascular surgeon oversee the peripheral perfusion and the choices within it. That boundary does not change, not even when the record itself becomes more and more complete. [10] [11] [12]

How do you note doubt about the CEAP classification? #

You note uncertainty about CEAP classification by leaving the doubt visible, instead of writing it away: the vascular history is linked to the wound status and the encounter, while peripheral pulses remain your own assessment. CEAP classification gets a place next to the endovascular procedure, no more than what the source indicates. Do not make the endovascular procedure more definite than the source itself allows, and note the open question explicitly within the peripheral perfusion. This keeps doubt recognisable for everyone who reads the record later. [1] [12] [10]

How do you record it when community nursing and the client describe the wound differently? #

If sources differ on the wound status, keep both readings side by side instead of choosing one yourself: CEAP classification gets the same origin rule as the endovascular procedure, and you assess the vascular history on your own judgement. Wound status is described in the words of the source, next to peripheral pulses. First note the origin of each reading, and only then assess within the peripheral perfusion which information takes precedence. This way neither version is lost, not even when they contradict each other. [1] [18] [12]

How do you note anticoagulation alongside an endovascular procedure? #

You record medication verbatim as the source states it, including the unit, while the endovascular procedure is recorded as an event with date and type: the wound status sits next to peripheral pulses, and you assess CEAP classification only when the encounter gives reason to. Hysio records the figures as they were provided; you as the vascular surgeon assess what they mean within the peripheral perfusion. This keeps a dosage a fact and a procedure an event, until you make a clinical judgement about it. [1] [12] [10]

How do you check the pulses before saving? #

Before saving, for peripheral pulses you read the text back next to the source and the date, as a final check on what was actually recorded: the endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, and the wound status is kept with its own origin. Correct any discrepancies in CEAP classification before the peripheral perfusion is saved as final. This way the last look is always yours, not Hysio's. [1] [9] [10] [18]

Introducing Hysio in the vascular clinic

How do you prepare a handover about pulses for a colleague? #

You prepare a handover about peripheral pulses by first agreeing who will read it: the endovascular procedure and vascular history keep their own origin, and you assess the wound status only within the team. The source provides the exact words for peripheral pulses, next to CEAP classification. Decide which information about CEAP classification the recipient actually needs, and set out the follow-up within the peripheral perfusion separately, apart from the rest of the handover. This keeps the handover concise, without unnecessary details. [11] [9] [18] [2]

Which headings for the vascular history do you agree with your team? #

For the vascular history you mainly need a team agreement: who approves the final peripheral perfusion. In addition, use fixed headings for the vascular history and shared terms for wound status, so that peripheral pulses and the endovascular procedure stay recognisably next to them. You assess CEAP classification only when the encounter gives reason to. This way everyone in the practice knows who takes the last step before anything becomes final. [1] [2] [11]

In which clinic sessions do you start voice-driven reporting in vascular surgery? #

First try out voice-driven reporting in one clearly defined contact, for example a clinic session for venous complaints. Collect the corrections on CEAP classification and endovascular procedure before you expand. The vascular history sits next to the wound status, and peripheral pulses are kept with their own origin. Only expand to more contacts once the representation of peripheral perfusion is right within that first trial. [8] [9] [1]

How do you align a wound report with your vascular centre's agreements? #

You adapt a report on wound status by checking it against local headings, and peripheral pulses against the authorisations that apply within your practice: CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure meanwhile keep their own origin, and you check the text about the vascular history before saving. Have a designated colleague check the representation of peripheral perfusion before the adjustment applies across the practice. This way the report fits how your team already works, rather than the other way round. [11] [1] [12]

How do you dictate the report of an endovascular procedure? #

State the access, the treated segment, the material used and the result on the completion imaging. Hysio puts that into the structure of the procedure report. Pulses and wound status afterwards get their own place. You check the report last. [1] [12] [2]

How do you measure whether AI documentation saves time on the vascular status? #

Time saved around peripheral pulses is best measured in your own team: note the time for measuring, checking and corrections, instead of relying on a promised percentage. The endovascular procedure and vascular history keep their own origin, and you assess the wound status yourself. Peripheral pulses carry the wording of the source, as does CEAP classification next to them. Give the peripheral perfusion priority over the clock: a correct note weighs more than a few seconds saved. [1] [11] [8]

Which conditions apply to a trial with Hysio in the vascular clinic? #

The same trial conditions apply to the vascular history as to the rest of Hysio: read those central conditions and use the free trial to assess the report representation of wound status in practice. Peripheral pulses sit next to CEAP classification, and you assess the endovascular procedure only when the encounter gives reason to. This way you test the system on your own cases before you choose a longer period. [8] [7] [9]

Where can you read about rates and data use in vascular surgery? #

The pricing page describes the Hysio plans and the trial conditions. Within Hysio there is no separate price for CEAP classification: it belongs to the content of the report. The privacy policy and the legal overview cover data use and responsibilities on the platform. For the vascular surgery assessment, consult the professional sources and your own working agreements, not the commercial terms. [7] [9] [10]

How do you record your own terms for the wound status? #

You record your own terminology around wound status by agreeing within your team how you write wound status, CEAP classification and the related abbreviations, with CEAP classification and the endovascular procedure keeping their own origin and the vascular history only getting a place after your check. Keep the peripheral perfusion understandable for colleagues who work with these terms less often. This prevents your own abbreviations from becoming a barrier outside your own team. [1] [11] [12]

How do you organise a complex case with several endovascular procedures? #

Split a complex case around an endovascular procedure into the separate encounters and sources it is built from, instead of cramming everything into one continuous story: the wound status is linked to peripheral pulses and the encounter, while CEAP classification remains your own assessment. The endovascular procedure sits next to the vascular history, without adding anything the source does not state. Organise the vascular history, findings and follow-up without adding an extra conclusion that the source itself does not draw. This keeps even a complicated case traceable step by step. [1] [12] [2] [10]

Sources

  1. 1 Hysio: Beroepsprofiel de vaatchirurgie (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  2. 2 Hysio: Hysio Vaatchirurgisch Consult (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  3. 3 Hysio: Hysio Vaatchirurgische Intake en Vaatanamnese (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  4. 4 Hysio: Hysio Vaatchirurgische Wond- en Vaatstatusdictatie (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  5. 5 Hysio: Hysio Vaatchirurgische Postoperatieve Controle (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  6. 6 Hysio: Hysio Vaatchirurgisch SOEP-Verslag (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 26 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  7. 7 Hysio: Actuele Hysio-prijzen (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-26 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  8. 8 Hysio: Actuele proefperiode (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-31 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  9. 9 Hysio: Hysio Privacyverklaring (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  10. 10 Hysio: Hysio Disclaimer (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  11. 11 Hysio: Hysio en medische dossiersystemen (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  12. 12 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Vaatchirurgie (NVvV): NVvV, officiële homepage Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  13. 13 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Vaatchirurgie (NVvV): Over NVvV Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  14. 14 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Heelkunde (NVvH), via Richtlijnendatabase: Perifeer Arterieel Vaatlijden (PAV), startpagina Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  15. 15 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Heelkunde (NVvH), via Richtlijnendatabase: Aneurysma van de abdominale aorta (AAA), startpagina Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  16. 16 NVDV / NVvH, via Richtlijnendatabase: Veneuze pathologie / Varices, module CEAP-classificatie Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  17. 17 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Heelkunde (NVvH), via Richtlijnendatabase: Vaattoegang voor hemodialyse, startpagina Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  18. 18 KNMG: KNMG-richtlijn Omgaan met medische gegevens Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  19. 19 DHD (Dutch Hospital Data): Implementatierichtlijnen Diagnose- en Verrichtingenthesaurus, versie 2.5 Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  20. 20 Richtlijnendatabase / Federatie Medisch Specialisten: Richtlijnen 3.0, werkwijze Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  21. 21 Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit (NZa): Medisch-specialistische zorg Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  22. 22 Cluster Arteriële en veneuze pathologie, via Richtlijnendatabase: Veneuze pathologie / Diepe veneuze ziekte, startpagina Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09

Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.