Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Clinical Genetics
After a consultation or results discussion, you dictate the family history and the agreements. Hysio keeps the pedigree, the question and the consent clearly apart.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
For questions about heredity, with a dedicated place for family history, pedigree, consent and counselling.
Read how Hysio works in a genetics consultation, when taking the family history or in a results discussion.
For a first conversation you choose the intake with family history: it covers the request for help, the pedigree and earlier testing in the family. If it concerns one clearly defined question, the consultation fits. If you discuss a result, you choose the results and counselling session. You decide which format fits the conversation. [2] [3] [4] [5] [1] [11]
Place the family history and pedigree under fixed headings in the record, so you can find the results discussion again quickly. Only assess what comes from the source after a check; the clinical geneticist decides which text ultimately remains for the familial risk assessment. [2] [1] [10]
Let consent fit your own route in the medical record system and check the results discussion together with the source before anything is saved. That keeps the record pathway traceable, while the pedigree and family history remain recognisable separately within the familial risk assessment. This prevents consent from becoming detached from the underlying conversation. [10] [1] [2]
Limit the note on family history to what this one contact requires and record the basis for sharing pedigree data separately, apart from the rest of the familial risk assessment. That way, when making privacy choices, you make sure only relevant data ends up in the record. This prevents sensitive family data from going further than this one conversation needs. [8] [13] [1]
The Hysio price for a clinical geneticist is on the central pricing page and changes nothing about the boundaries around genetic testing or familial risk assessment. The pedigree, results discussion and family history are content elements of the record, not separate price components. [6] [7]
If your department works with its own pedigree software, the drawn pedigree stays there. Hysio records what was said about the family in the conversation, so you can put that information next to the drawing. For each family member, note who gave the information. [1] [10] [11]
Put the report next to the results report and the conversation. Check the gene name, the variant and the classification letter by letter, because one wrong character changes the meaning. What you explained in the conversation stays separate from what the report says. [1] [11] [9]
Focus on the client first and only check consent and the results discussion afterwards, before you finalise the note. Link the family history and pedigree to the same contact, so the conversation with the client remains recognisable as a whole within the familial risk assessment. In doing so, avoid judgements that do not come directly from the conversation itself. [1] [2] [10]
Hysio organises the family history and links the source to it, while you assess the pedigree yourself and decide what is usable; that distinction makes Hysio different from a ready-made text generator. In that comparison, consent and the results discussion always remain traceable to the original source, regardless of the familial risk assessment. It is precisely that separation between organising and assessing that makes the collaboration workable. [1] [2] [10]
At the introduction stage, start around the results discussion with one recognisable contact and agree in advance who checks the family history. That way you prevent the pedigree and consent from ending up in the record separately before you use genetic testing more widely within the familial risk assessment. Only expand further once that first agreement works well in practice. [7] [8] [1]
This format brings together the family history, the pedigree and the next steps of the contact in a clear overview; you always check before anything is saved. You link the results discussion and consent to that same contact, so nothing is left detached from the familial risk assessment. That way it always stays clear afterwards who provided which part of the conversation. [2] [1] [11]
This documentation format brings together consent, the results discussion and the next steps of the contact, with your check as the last step before saving. You describe the pedigree in the words the source itself uses, following on from the family history, so the intake stays complete for the familial risk assessment. [3] [1] [11]
In the results and counselling session, this documentation format brings together the result discussed, the family history and the next steps of the contact, ready for your check. Record which information comes from the source and which question the client still has. The clinical geneticist determines the interpretation and the next appointment. [4] [1] [11]
Following the SOAP structure, this format brings together the results discussion, the family history and the next steps of the contact, and here too saving waits for your check. Record how consent and the pedigree were discussed, with the source as the starting point for the familial risk assessment. That keeps the report traceable for anyone who consults the record later. [5] [1] [11]
Which format best fits the family history and this specific consultation is up to you; there is no mandatory standard choice within the familial risk assessment. Check the text about consent and the results discussion before saving, with the pedigree always as a fixed point of comparison. So there is no required order between these documentation formats within the same consultation. [1] [2] [11]
An intake is meant for the start of a course of care in which a genetic test comes up, and a follow-up note for the moment when an earlier result changes or is supplemented. Link the pedigree and consent to the same conversation, so the familial risk assessment stays well founded. In this way, both formats complement each other once the course of care moves from the request for help to the next steps. [1] [2] [11]
Record the findings discussed and the agreed next steps without adding anything that the conversation itself did not produce. Record the source and the speaker for the family history or pedigree. The clinical geneticist assesses the meaning and decides which next step goes into the record. [1] [2] [11]
For the results discussion, make the source, the recipient and the agreement made visible in the handover, and always check consent before you share anything. You link the pedigree and family history to the same results moment, with the source as a point of reference, relevant to the familial risk assessment. That keeps the handover of the results discussion fully traceable to the original source. [1] [2] [11]
Always keep the client's account, observation and your own assessment apart, and record separately which source provided consent. That way, given the scope of the note, you separate consent from the pedigree, the results discussion and the family history within the familial risk assessment. This prevents your own interpretation from accidentally counting as a hard source. [1] [2] [11]
Compare the family history per contact on the same key points and only name changes that the source actually supports. Consent, the results discussion and the pedigree remain the fixed reference points with which you put two contacts side by side within the familial risk assessment. If you depart from that pattern, briefly explain the difference in the record. [1] [2] [11]
Record the presenting question and the course in the source's own words, and only add the family history when it was actually discussed during the consultation. Consent and the results discussion belong with it, while the pedigree stays in the background without you filling it in yourself within the familial risk assessment. [1] [11]
Write down who said it: the counsellee, a family member or the referrer. A test that is only known by hearsay is noted as a report and not as a confirmed result. Only once there is a report or result does it get a source. [1] [13] [11]
For the pedigree, record the date and the source; you determine their professional meaning yourself. You describe the results discussion and family history with the same origin details, so the origin stays traceable for the familial risk assessment. Only compare that information with earlier notes once the origin is clearly established. [1] [11]
Link the results discussion to the underlying investigation, the date and the source, and give your own assessment of the family history a separate place alongside it. The pedigree and consent belong to the same contact, but stand apart from the actual investigation result within the familial risk assessment. That keeps it clear whether the result speaks for itself or whether you are interpreting it yourself. [1] [11] [13]
Hysio adopts a report on consent that was provided word for word, but does not assess any images for the pedigree itself; the source remains authoritative for that. You describe the family history and results discussion in the same style as that source, without adding anything yourself for the familial risk assessment. If in doubt about the imaging, always check back with the source that provided it. [10] [9] [11]
Use the terms your team uses for degree of relationship, such as first-degree for parents, brothers, sisters and children. For each family member, also state the side of the family: paternal or maternal. That way a colleague can trace the pedigree back from the report. [1] [11]
What a family member says about their own result is noted as information from that person. Whether that information may go into the counsellee's record is something you ask and note separately. Without consent, it stays at what the counsellee knows themselves. [1] [13] [11]
For the team, what matters most is who drew up the pedigree, which family members have already been tested and who takes on the next steps, such as a family letter or a test for a family member. Keep apart what is confirmed and what is still hearsay. [1] [2] [13]
Let an example case show the real contact, the results discussion and the next steps, but never make up a diagnosis yourself. In that case, the pedigree, consent and family history belong to the same, traceable contact within the familial risk assessment. For an example of voice-driven admin like this, only use anonymised or fictitious data that is not traceable to a real client. [1] [11] [2]
Note what the counsellee gave consent for: a family letter, requesting the records of a deceased family member or sharing the result with the referrer. Only include in the handover what is needed for that purpose. [10] [8] [13] [11]
Hysio organises what was said about the family and the test, but never makes a diagnosis or sets an indication itself; the clinical geneticist determines that meaning. You record the family history and pedigree with their origin. Hysio deliberately maintains that boundary, even when a result seems unambiguous. [9] [1] [11]
The results discussion and consent take place within the same consultation, while the pedigree separately remains your own responsibility, also within the familial risk assessment. You choose the record content yourself and assess the family history; Hysio never takes over that professional decision. At most, Hysio provides a clear starting point, never an approved final version. [1] [9] [13]
Clearly mark that genetic testing is missing or has not yet been discussed, and do not add any date, value or conclusion that is not there. Meanwhile, simply describe the pedigree and consent with their own origin that is available, without the familial risk assessment waiting for it. Fill in the missing part manually later as soon as that information comes in after all. [1] [9] [11]
An urgent result that must be discussed with the client the same day gets its own source, moment and agreement in the report. The clinical geneticist determines the urgency and the way of reporting back. Hysio only describes what was said and agreed and does not infer an urgent decision from missing information. [9] [8] [11]
Only if the counsellee gives consent for it. The counsellee often informs family members themselves, possibly with a family letter. Note what was agreed, who informs whom and whether a letter was given. Hysio does not share anything itself. [8] [13] [1]
Hysio places consent under its own heading, but never chooses a follow-up pathway, investigation or counselling direction itself; the clinical geneticist determines that. The family history and pedigree belong to the same counselling pathway when the conversation connects that information. Missing data stays visibly open and is not filled in by Hysio. [9] [10] [11]
Write down the variant as the laboratory reports it, with the classification, for example class 3. Also note what you explained to the counsellee about what it does and does not mean. Hysio makes no statement about heredity or risk itself. [1] [11] [9]
Leave both descriptions in place, with who said what. If one says breast cancer and the other ovarian cancer for the same aunt, you note it as an open point. With a medical report or pathology result you can correct it later. [1] [13] [11]
Adopt the pedigree and the related measurements around consent word for word, with source and unit; the clinical geneticist then assesses this themselves. The results discussion and family history belong to the same medication or measurement note, without your own interpretation getting ahead of the familial risk assessment. Repeat that check at every subsequent measurement, even if the result seems unchanged. [1] [11] [9]
For the results discussion, always read the text back next to the source and the date, and correct the family history before you save definitively. In that final check, the pedigree and consent get the same origin check, just before the familial risk assessment is recorded. Correct any discrepancies you find immediately, instead of noting them separately later. [1] [8] [9] [13]
Agree who reviews the report before the letter goes to the referrer. Include which result was discussed, what advice there is for surveillance and which family members can be offered a test. What the counsellee does not want to share stays out. [10] [8] [13] [2]
Use fixed headings for consent and shared terms within the team for the results discussion, and record who gives final approval. The family history and pedigree follow the same agreement in team use, also where it touches on the familial risk assessment. Review that agreement periodically, especially when new colleagues join the team. [1] [2] [10]
First test the family history in one clearly defined contact and collect the first corrections to the pedigree there; only expand further once it is right. Consent and the results discussion belong to that same small trial, with the source as the check for the familial risk assessment. Deliberately involve a colleague who reviews critically in that first trial. [7] [8] [1]
Check the report on genetic testing against your team's local headings and the family history against the applicable authorisations; then let a designated colleague check this. In the same step, you adapt the pedigree and consent to local agreements, within the familial risk assessment. Briefly document every adjustment, so the reason for it can be traced later. [10] [1] [11]
A family history has many names, relationships and years. You say them as the client tells them, and Hysio puts them in order in the report: that is voice-driven reporting. Who supplied which detail stays visible. You check the pedigree and the interpretation. [1] [11] [2]
Always measure, check and correct around the results discussion within your own team, and give priority to care over a promised time percentage. The pedigree, consent and family history follow the same approach in that time measurement, with a view to the familial risk assessment. Discuss deviating times within the team, instead of silently letting them pass. [1] [10] [7]
For consent, first read the central trial conditions and use the free trial to assess the results discussion. The family history and pedigree belong to that same trial, with the source as the starting point for the clinical geneticist within the familial risk assessment. Round off that free trial with a short, joint evaluation moment within the team. [7] [6] [8]
The current subscription costs are on the Hysio pricing page. The privacy statement and the legal overview describe the agreements on data processing and responsibility. There is no separate Hysio rate for family history or pedigree data. Review the platform terms for the intended use and also follow the professional agreements on recording and sharing information about the patient and family members. [6] [8] [9]
Agree within your team how you write genetic testing, the pedigree and the abbreviations used, and keep that understandable for colleagues. Consent and the family history follow the same agreement in that terminology of your own, which benefits the familial risk assessment. Share that terminology list widely, also with new colleagues who are just joining. [1] [10] [11]
Work per generation and per side of the family. For each affected family member, note the diagnosis, the age at diagnosis and the source of that information. That way the pedigree stays readable in text too, without Hysio linking a conclusion about heredity to it. [1] [11] [2] [9]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.