Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Paediatrics
After a consultation with child and parents, you say what each of them told you and what you saw. Hysio puts growth, development and the parents' history each in their place.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
For the health and development of children, with room for what the child says and what parents or school tell you.
Here you can see how Hysio works in a paediatric consultation, an intake or a conversation with parents and child.
School information usually belongs at the start of the encounter, so with Hysio Paediatric Consultation or Hysio Paediatric Intake. Both formats organise the request for help together with growth, development and the family context. A short follow-up encounter rarely calls for new school information; Hysio Paediatric Parent-Child Conversation suits that better, with the updated perspective of child and parent. You decide which to choose based on what was discussed during this specific encounter. [2] [3] [4] [5] [1] [11]
Hysio places development and the nutritional history under their own headings, with the source stated alongside. This keeps it visible whether a detail comes from you, from the parent or from an earlier report. Growth and school information are treated the same way within the family context. This fixed structure makes the record quicker to search and prevents separate observations from getting mixed up, while the final text and the choices for the record stay with you. [2] [1] [10]
In Hysio, the history from the parents goes under its own heading, separate from your own findings and from growth you measured yourself. That distinction shows what the parent said and what you observed yourself during the encounter. For the record pathway itself, you follow the layout of your own medical record system; Hysio provides the source-bound text, and you place and check it before it is saved as final. [10] [1] [2]
Hysio only includes the nutritional history if it was actually discussed during the encounter, with the source stated alongside. You limit the note to what this care question requires and leave out other family information. For sensitive topics, you record consent to share separately from the factual nutritional history itself. This way the privacy choice stays with you, and it is not Hysio that decides what is or is not shared. [8] [11] [1]
The price of Hysio does not depend on the topic of the encounter; growth, development or the nutritional history make no difference to the rate. The current plans and monthly costs are set out clearly on the central pricing page, including the conditions for an annual subscription. There you can also see what is included in each plan. There are no separate rates for paediatric care; the plan works the same as for other professions. [6] [7]
Your own template may fit better when your practice already uses a fixed layout for school information that does not match the structure of Hysio. In that case, compare both layouts: does your template cover the same source roles for the history from the parents, growth and development? Does it match how your colleagues read the record? Where your own route fits local agreements better, you can keep using it; Hysio does not need to replace every encounter. [1] [10] [11]
For the source check, you place Hysio's report next to your own dictation or notes on development. Check whether growth, the nutritional history and school information match what was actually said or measured. A fixed report structure does not automatically make the content correct; that check stays with you. Only after this review do you save the final report in the record. [1] [11] [9]
Because Hysio listens along or records the conversation, you do not have to type at the same time while taking the history from the parents. This leaves room to keep eye contact with the child and to listen attentively to the parent. You only note growth and school information afterwards, when you check the report. That order keeps the encounter itself personal, while the documentation runs in the background. [1] [2] [10]
You follow the standards of your own profession and tell the child and parents that you use Hysio; audio is stored securely in the EU. [19]
Hysio links the nutritional history directly to the source it came from, instead of mixing everything into one continuous text. This lets you see later whether a detail comes from the parent, from you or from earlier school information. Growth and development receive the same source-bound treatment. The difference from separate typing or a general template lies in that recognisable origin, not in a judgement that Hysio adds itself. [1] [2] [10]
Start with one recognisable type of encounter, for example a regular growth check, and try out the recording or dictation with it a few times. Agree who checks the report before the nutritional history and school information are included as standard. Only once those first encounters run well do you extend Hysio to other types of encounter within paediatrics. This keeps the introduction stage manageable and clear for your whole team. [7] [8] [1]
Hysio Paediatric Consultation suits a regular encounter, such as a first visit or a periodic check-up in which growth, development and the request for help come together. The format organises the reason for the visit, findings and the follow-up discussed, with the nutritional history and school information in their own place. For an extensive first introduction to the family, Hysio Paediatric Intake is a better fit, and for a conversation that mainly revolves around the perspective of parent and child, Hysio Paediatric Parent-Child Conversation is a better fit. [2] [1] [11]
Hysio Paediatric Intake suits the first, extensive encounter in which you map out the child's medical history, growth and development. The format gives the history from the parents, the nutritional history and school information each their own place, so that the starting situation is recorded completely and traceably. For a short follow-up encounter the intake is too extensive; Hysio Paediatric Consultation is a better fit then. The intake is therefore mainly intended for new clients or for a broadly oriented first conversation. [3] [1] [11]
Hysio Paediatric Parent-Child Conversation suits an encounter in which the perspectives of parent and child are explicitly set side by side, for example in a conversation about results or advice. The format keeps the history from the parents and the child's own perception apart, while growth and development stay tied to the source. For a regular check-up without that specific conversational perspective, Hysio Paediatric Consultation is a better fit. This way you choose based on whose voice is central in the encounter. [4] [1] [11]
Hysio Paediatric SOAP Note suits an encounter you want to document according to Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, for example after an examination or a procedure. School information and the history from the parents go under Subjective, growth and development under Objective, with your own assessment separately under Assessment. For a free-flowing conversation without that fixed layout, Hysio Paediatric Consultation is a better fit. The SOAP format is therefore mainly intended for teams that already work with that structure. [5] [1] [11]
The nutritional history belongs in every format, but the choice follows the type of encounter. For a general visit, Hysio Paediatric Consultation is the right fit; for the first, broad introduction to the family, Hysio Paediatric Intake; and as soon as the perspective of parent and child together is central, Hysio Paediatric Parent-Child Conversation. The nutritional history, growth and school information stay tied to the source in all three; only the layout of the encounter differs. [1] [2] [11]
Hysio Paediatric Intake is intended for situations where growth is mapped out for the first time, together with the nutritional history and the child's wider development. For a follow-up encounter, in which you mainly discuss the change compared with earlier measurements, Hysio Paediatric Consultation is a better fit. The distinction lies in what is new: the intake describes the starting point, while the follow-up encounter shows how growth has developed since then within the family. [1] [2] [11]
After a follow-up encounter, school information should include the reason for the visit, what has changed since then and which agreements were made. You link growth and development to the same encounter, with the history from the parents alongside as a separate source. Describe the reason, what was done and the findings as they were discussed, without adding a medical conclusion of your own. That conclusion and the further management stay with you as the paediatrician. [1] [2] [11]
A handover about development contains the source of the information, when it was gathered and what exactly was measured or discussed. You include growth and the nutritional history as they were recorded, without additions of your own that do not come from the encounter. Make it clear who the recipient is and what purpose the handover serves. Also check whether consent has been given before information about the family is shared with another healthcare professional. [1] [2] [11]
Hysio keeps what the parent says, what you observe yourself and what you assess professionally apart by placing each under its own heading. This keeps it clear whether growth, the nutritional history or school information comes from the parent or from your own examination. With voice-driven admin, that separation prevents an assumption from being read as an established fact. You then assess how much weight each source carries in the final conclusion. [1] [2] [11]
Compare the nutritional history for each encounter on the same fixed points, so that you quickly recognise a change without rereading the whole record. Growth, development, school information and the history from the parents follow the same structure as in earlier encounters. Only name a change when the source actually supports it, and leave uncertain details marked as such. This keeps the comparison factual and traceable to the original encounter. [1] [2] [11]
In the history, Hysio records the nutritional history in the parent's or child's own words, linked to the request for help and the course so far. Growth and school information each get their own place, separate from your own assessment. You only include the nutritional history when it was actually discussed during this encounter; do not add anything to make the picture seem more complete. In this structure, the history from the parents stays recognisable as a separate source. [1] [11]
For information about growth, Hysio notes who provided it: the child, the parent or an earlier report. You keep that distinction separate from your own observation during the encounter, so that it stays clear later what was measured and what was said. Development and the nutritional history follow the same approach. That origin makes growth traceable within the record, even when a colleague reads the report back later. [1] [11]
At a time of measurement, Hysio notes school information together with the instrument used, the unit and the time of measurement. You assess growth separately from development, each with its own source. The documentation sticks to what was actually measured; you then decide what that value means professionally for the child. The nutritional history and the history from the parents stay separately recognisable in this note. [1] [11]
Link development to a result by noting the examination, the date and the source of the result together. Hysio places those three details together, while growth and the nutritional history stay separate. Your own assessment of what the result means for the child gets its own recognisable place in the report, separate from the factual details themselves. School information and the history from the parents remain unchanged as separate sources. [1] [11]
No. Hysio includes a provided imaging report as it was written, but does not assess any images itself and draws no conclusion from them. The history from the parents stays recognisable in that report as a separate source, apart from what the radiologist or specialist reported. You add growth and the nutritional history separately. The assessment of imaging, like any medical interpretation, stays with you and your referring colleague. [10] [9] [11]
For the nutritional history, Hysio uses the terms that you and your team already use; the platform does not invent its own professional language. Record abbreviations you use often once, so that growth, development and school information stay clearly readable for colleagues. You write the history from the parents in the same way, in wording that matches the usual terminology within paediatrics. This keeps the report recognisable for everyone who reads it back later. [1] [11]
When a relative, for example a grandparent or babysitter, provides information about growth, Hysio explicitly names that person as the source, separate from what the parent said. The nutritional history and school information follow the same approach when they come from a relative or referrer. Record consent to share that information separately, before you share it further. Development stays tied to the source in this note and traceable to the original source. [1] [11]
For a team meeting, the team mainly needs to see which discipline provided school information and who picks up the follow-up. Hysio makes that origin visible alongside growth and development, so the discussion does not stall on the question of where a detail came from. Keep the text understandable for colleagues outside paediatrics, without unnecessary jargon. The history from the parents and the nutritional history stay in the same clear structure. [1] [2] [11]
A good example is a regular growth check in which school information, the history from the parents and a measurement together lead to a complete picture of development. Such an example case shows the real encounter and the follow-up discussed, without a diagnosis being invented. In that example, the nutritional history and growth are in their own place, with the source stated alongside. View such an example in the demo of this profile to see how the structure works in practice. [1] [11] [2]
You limit a handover about the history from the parents to the source and the purpose of the handover, so that the recipient can ask for what they need. In that handover, Hysio keeps development, growth and school information separate from each other, each with its own origin. Do not add any interpretation of your own that does not come from the encounter. This keeps the handover factual and traceable to the original conversation with parent and child. [10] [8] [11]
No. Hysio organises the history from the parents together with growth, development, the nutritional history and school information, but does not make a diagnosis itself or choose a treatment. The structure makes the source data clear; you, as the paediatrician, determine what it means. If you are unsure what a detail means exactly, you check it yourself before it is finalised in the record. With Hysio, that professional assessment does not shift to the platform. [9] [1] [11]
You check the nutritional history, like the rest of the report, before it is saved as final. Hysio provides the source-bound text on growth, development and school information, but does not take over that final professional review. You assess whether the content matches what was said during the encounter and whether the choices for the record fit your own way of working. The history from the parents is subject to the same check. [1] [9] [11]
If growth is missing during an encounter, Hysio marks it as not discussed instead of inventing or filling in a value. The nutritional history, school information and the history from the parents stay recognisable separately from each other. Do not add a date or conclusion yourself that does not come from the encounter. At a next encounter, you add the missing detail as soon as it has actually been discussed or measured. [1] [9] [11]
Hysio is not intended for triage or acute assessment of school information; that always remains your own professional judgement. After the acute assessment, you can have the details on growth, development and the history from the parents documented in a source-bound way once the encounter has been completed. You process the nutritional history at the same time. So only use Hysio as support for documentation, never as an aid during the acute assessment itself. [9] [8] [11]
You decide who may receive information about development, based on purpose and consent, not Hysio. Before sharing growth, the nutritional history or school information, check whether consent has been given and which recipient has actually been agreed. You share the history from the parents on the same conditions. Only note in the record what was actually discussed and shared, so that the agreement stays traceable later. [8] [11] [1]
No. Hysio clearly places the history from the parents under its own heading, together with growth, development and school information, but does not draw up a treatment plan or choose a next step. That choice stays with you as the paediatrician, based on your own assessment of the encounter. The nutritional history is likewise only organised, not interpreted. So the platform does not monitor a treatment plan; you do that yourself. [9] [10] [11]
Hysio leaves doubt about the nutritional history recognisable, instead of making it more definite than the source allows. Growth, development and school information are treated the same way when the information is not clear-cut. Note the open question explicitly in the report, so that a colleague knows later where further enquiry is needed. In that note, the history from the parents stays linked to the original, uncertain source. [1] [11] [9]
When sources on growth differ, for example between what the parent says and what you measure yourself, Hysio keeps both accounts side by side instead of choosing one. The nutritional history and school information follow the same approach when information is contradictory. Note the origin of each account before you assess yourself which carries the most weight. Development stays tied to the source in that comparison. [1] [11]
Hysio copies medication and measurements related to growth verbatim, including source, dosage and unit, without adding anything itself. School information is added in the same way, with its origin stated alongside. You then assess whether the medication or measurement is still current and whether it needs adjusting. Development and the history from the parents stay separately recognisable in this note. [1] [11] [9]
For the final review, you read the report on development back next to the source and the date of the encounter. Correct school information, growth or the nutritional history where the report differs from what was actually discussed, before you save. You check the history from the parents in the same way. Only after that check does the report become a final part of the record, and you do the saving yourself. [1] [8] [9] [11]
Prepare a team handover about development by first checking the origin of school information and the history from the parents for completeness. Agree who reads the report before it is shared, and decide which information about growth and the nutritional history the recipient actually needs. Set out the follow-up discussed separately, apart from the factual findings. This keeps the handover compact and useful for the colleague who receives it. [10] [8] [11] [2]
For the history from the parents, Hysio works best with an agreement on fixed headings and shared terms, so that every team member recognises the same layout. Record who approves the report on growth and the nutritional history before it becomes final. School information follows the same agreement. Without that shared way of working, differences between colleagues in how the history from the parents is noted and read arise more quickly. [1] [2] [10]
Start with the nutritional history in one clearly defined type of encounter, for example a fixed growth check, and after a few times collect the corrections you make to school information or the history from the parents. You test growth and development alongside in the same way. Only when that small trial is right and the report needs little adjustment do you extend its use to other types of encounter within your practice. [7] [8] [1]
Check a report on growth against the headings and abbreviations that are customary within your own team, and adjust the layout where needed. You align the nutritional history and school information with local habits in the same way. Have a colleague with authorisation check the first adjusted reports before the new layout becomes standard. In that adjustment, the history from the parents stays source-bound and recognisable. [10] [1] [11]
You no longer have to rebuild the conversation from your notes. You say what the parents told you, what the child said and what you saw: that is voice-driven reporting. Hysio keeps those perspectives apart, also for school information. You measure whether it saves time yourself, over a few clinic sessions. [1] [11] [2]
Measure time savings around development by following a few comparable encounters in your own team, before and after using Hysio. Look not only at the recording time, but also at how much correction growth and the nutritional history still need. You include school information in the same comparison. Give that measurement of your own priority over a general percentage, because the time savings differ per practice. [1] [10] [7]
No separate conditions apply to the history from the parents during the free trial; Hysio's central trial conditions apply to every encounter, including growth and the nutritional history. Use the free trial to assess whether the documentation of school information fits how you work. You test development alongside in the same way. Consult the current trial conditions on the website for the exact duration and conditions. [7] [6] [8]
You can find the subscription price under Pricing, and the explanation of data processing under Legal. That information is about the use of Hysio, not about costs for a nutritional history or growth assessment. In paediatric documentation, statements from the child, parents and others involved can come together. You decide which information is relevant and how it appears recognisably in the record, within the applicable agreements. [6] [8] [9]
Agree within your team how you write growth, the nutritional history and frequently used abbreviations, and share that agreement so that everyone recognises the same terms. Hysio does not invent its own terminology, but follows the words that you and your colleagues use. You record school information and development in the same way. This keeps the report understandable for everyone within the practice, including those who did not attend the encounter themselves. [1] [10] [11]
Break a complex case around school information down into the separate encounters it is made up of, instead of merging everything into one continuous text. For each encounter, organise the findings on growth and development, with the history from the parents alongside as a separate source. Do not add an extra conclusion that the separate encounters do not support themselves. This keeps even an extensive record clear and traceable to the original conversation. [1] [11] [2] [9]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.