Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Orthoptics
Hysio organises orthoptic encounters around the request for help, eye examination, binocular findings, professional interpretation and evaluation.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
Hysio keeps orthoptic documentation moments clearly separate from optometry. Eye position, eye movements, visual acuity and binocular vision are only included as a finding when they have been recorded. Hysio does not draw an ophthalmological conclusion, does not determine urgency and does not make a referral on behalf of the orthoptist.
For each consultation, you can read what Hysio records about eye position, eye movements and binocular vision, and what you assess as an orthoptist.
Within the ocular motility record, Hysio Orthoptic Consultation remains a format for an orthoptic consultation covering eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and plan. This applies to ongoing oculomotor care with a client who is already known. In the ocular motility record, eye position, motility, visual acuity and binocular interpretation stay separate from the request for help for this follow-up contact. For the request for help, read back eye position, motility and visual acuity separately and leave the professional overall picture to the practitioner. [1] [3]
For the orthoptic intake and the related oculomotor examination in one source-bound structure, Hysio Orthoptic Intake with Examination is intended for the ocular motility record. This format fits an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function. In the ocular motility record, the orthoptist links "Summary" to the first information source. "Registration, DTO screening and care question" stays separately readable for an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function. A prism measurement or fixation finding that was not recorded is not given a plausible default value if information about eye position and eye movements is missing. Read back eye position, motility and visual acuity separately and leave the professional overall picture to the practitioner. [1] [4]
Hysio Orthoptic Evaluation is the format for an orthoptic evaluation with progress towards goals, repeated findings and agreed follow-up in the ocular motility record. In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the orthoptist keeps the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up with their original information source. Fixating eye, test conditions, laterality and result belong to the same measurement note when documenting binocular vision. The practitioner determines the overall picture, referral question and treatment choice from the complete eye examination for the interpretation of binocular vision. [1] [5]
Hysio Orthoptic Intake with Examination is intended for an initial orthoptic examination. The layout keeps the request for help, history, eye position, motility, visual acuity and binocular findings readable as separate parts. A test that was not carried out stays open. The orthoptist determines the overall picture, any referral question and the final record text. For a follow-up consultation without a new examination, Hysio Orthoptic Consultation is a better fit. [1] [2] [4]
What you dictate is organised into the fields of the ocular motility record: request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up. For each item, state who provided it and when it was examined. The orthoptist compares the dictation with the source and decides which observation and conclusion belong in the record. In this way, voice-driven reporting keeps each orthoptic finding with the source it comes from. [1] [2] [3]
For an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the report layout for eye position and eye movement remains a profession-focused structure and does not make an ophthalmological diagnosis, urgency assessment or referral. If the examination findings are missing, the orthoptist leaves that place in the ocular motility record open. An observation of eye movement only becomes a professional conclusion after substantive interpretation when the examination findings are worded. Only the orthoptist can add a conclusion or choice for the ocular motility record. [1] [2] [4]
In the ocular motility record, the orthoptist separates the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up based on where they actually came from. Around the professional conclusion in an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, what the client said stays visible. The orthoptist places the observation about the professional conclusion in the ocular motility record next to the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions. Professional interpretation is given its own origin and assessment by the orthoptist. [1] [2] [3]
Before saving to the ocular motility record, the orthoptist places the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions next to the original note. For the treatment agreements, read back eye position, motility and visual acuity separately and leave the professional overall picture to the practitioner. The orthoptist later keeps only a version of the ocular motility record in which origin and terminology are correct. [1] [2] [3]
For ocular motility records, there is no promise that Hysio automatically connects to every medical record system. When transferring the ocular motility record, the orthoptist specifically reviews laterality, test conditions, motility finding, evaluation moment and verified recipient. The practice procedure for the ocular motility record determines the format within an ocular motility practice. Access and version control stay linked to the ocular motility record. The report layout for eye position and eye movement does not prove any technical integration for the ocular motility record; the transfer remains human work. [1] [2] [5]
For the ocular motility record, the orthoptist chooses between consultation, intake with examination and evaluation based on the actual purpose of contact. The consultation is intended for ongoing oculomotor care, the combined intake for the initial inventory and examination, and the evaluation for progress towards goals and follow-up. This way each documentation format fits the contact and feedback to those involved stays traceable. [1] [2] [5]
The orthoptist documents the registration and the request for help about vision in the ocular motility record with origin and moment of contact. In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the orthoptist links the moment of contact and care goal to the registration and the request for help about vision. Hysio Orthoptic Intake with Examination is intended to keep motility and the coordination of the eyes separate. If information about the registration and the request for help about vision is missing, that passage stays open. For the registration and the request for help about vision, read back eye position, motility and visual acuity separately and leave the professional overall picture to the practitioner. [2] [4]
The request for help in the ocular motility record comes from the conversation with the client or companion. Eye position, motility and binocular vision are observations or test outcomes with laterality, direction and test conditions. The orthoptist then records the professional conclusion separately. With voice-driven reporting, a reported complaint therefore never becomes an examination finding or treatment decision by itself. [2] [4]
Within the orthoptic examination cycle, you document binocular vision in the phase where this part belongs. In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, assess that place in connection with the request for help, the examination, the professional conclusion and the plan. The documentation format Hysio Orthoptic Intake with Examination preserves that order without deriving a cause or choice around binocular vision itself. For binocular vision, the methodical choice stays with the orthoptist; they approve the text. [2] [4]
For motility and eye position, keep the examined eye, direction of gaze, test conditions and date from the same examination source. A negation or uncertain observation stays literally recognisable. Where outcomes differ, the orthoptist compares the original tests before changing the professional conclusion. The documentation format does not select a preferred reading and does not draw a treatment conclusion. [2] [4]
In the ocular motility record, the orthoptist gives the amblyopia data the same certainty as the original source. An observation of an eye movement is not yet a conclusion. Only after your interpretation does it become a professional conclusion. So put the professional term next to the care goal of the examination. What the data mean for the child or adult is for you to decide. [2] [4]
In the ocular motility record, the orthoptist selects, around the examination findings, only context that clarifies the purpose of an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function. In the ocular motility record, that can be the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions, provided the source contains these details. The practice limits the ocular motility record to purpose-bound data and appropriate access for data about the examination findings. Hysio Orthoptic Intake with Examination does not automatically take over unnecessary background information; the orthoptist decides what stays readable and necessary for the record. [2] [4]
In the ocular motility record, link the professional conclusion only to a measurement or observation that was actually carried out in an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function. The orthoptist notes the known method, location or side, outcome and date as far as these appear from the source. Suitable examples are eye position, eye movements, visual acuity or other orthoptic data when you actually examine them; only an observation or measure that was actually used belongs in the report. The professional meaning remains for the orthoptist to assess. [2] [3]
In the ocular motility record, connect the treatment agreements to a goal that the orthoptist discussed or professionally established during an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function. Keep the registration and the request for help about vision separate; the orthoptist then notes the follow-up action, the person responsible and the appropriate evaluation moment. The documentation format Hysio Orthoptic Consultation does not create a plan from separate data. The practitioner determines the overall picture, referral question and treatment choice from the complete eye examination for the interpretation of the treatment agreements. [2] [3]
For the evaluation moment, Hysio Orthoptic Evaluation is the documentation format that fits most closely with an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function. In the ocular motility record, the orthoptist compares the required set of sources and layout with the actual documentation moment. The report layout for eye position and eye movement does not select anything independently. The practitioner determines the overall picture, referral question and treatment choice from the complete eye examination for the interpretation of the evaluation moment. [2] [5]
When reporting back, the ocular motility record captures which complaint, laterality, test conditions and finding belong to the evaluation moment. The orthoptist separates reported change, repeated measurement, professional conclusion and agreed follow-up and verifies the recipient. This documentation format does not choose a treatment decision. Only the feedback that has been read through and approved is shared and kept in line with local policy. [2] [5]
The NVvO professional profile and the quality criteria set the orthoptic professional standard; the training title falls under article 34 and not article 3. The ocular motility record names the NVvO professional profile and the related quality criteria with publisher, date and type of source. In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the ocular motility record shows the legal status. An ocular motility practice keeps professional standards separate from government rules. [6] [8] [9] [10]
For eye position, motility, visual acuity and binocular function, you use the NVvO framework and the current criteria for orthoptic record keeping. For eye position and eye movements, the orthoptist uses only the applicable part of the NVvO professional profile and the related quality criteria. The ocular motility record keeps the document version and scope. In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, a local agreement stays recognisably local. [7]
The title of orthoptist is legally linked to the training, while a separate BIG registration does not automatically follow from it. In the ocular motility record, the legal position of orthoptist is kept separate from any second care role. The orthoptist states only a status that can be demonstrated for an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function. Another capacity is checked separately for the ocular motility record. [10]
For an orthoptic complaint, the practice records the facts of the contact, those involved and follow-up according to the applicable complaints route. After an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, a report in the ocular motility record is given facts, date and follow-up. An ocular motility practice chooses the applicable complaints procedure. The ocular motility record contains facts and no independent legal judgement. [12]
The retention period is determined for the specific eye care relationship and not derived from a general professional document alone. The ocular motility record links the chosen retention period to the specific orthoptic care relationship and the document version consulted. The practice reassesses a change and does not let an unconfirmed period appear as a fixed rule in the client text. [7] [11]
Kwaliteitsregister Paramedici (the Dutch quality register for allied health professionals) assesses criteria for orthoptists; that registration must be described separately from statutory title protection. For an orthoptist, the KP page consulted, the criteria period and the validity of the registration are kept. The ocular motility record does not present this quality assurance as a separate BIG registration. A register status that has not been confirmed stays out of the public text. [8] [9] [10]
In an orthoptic examination, document what consent was requested for and which answer followed; note a discussed recording or disclosure with its own purpose. In an orthoptic examination, question, answer and date of contact are kept with the correct client or companion source. Any recording or feedback is only mentioned when it was actually discussed, including purpose and recipient. The orthoptist reviews the final text themselves. [4] [7]
Before a transfer, the orthoptist checks the recipient, laterality, necessary findings and the legal basis for disclosure. For a transfer from the ocular motility record, the orthoptist checks the care goal, recipient and scope of data. In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the ocular motility record keeps the client's words apart from the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up. An ocular motility practice uses the verified destination and the local sending method. [5] [7] [11]
Oculomotor interpretation, referral question and treatment decision stay with the orthoptist and may not be derived from a report structure. In the ocular motility record, the layout can separate the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up. You interpret an examination of eye position and motility yourself. With AI reporting too, the follow-up and the saved version remain your work. [2] [3]
With each source update, compare the date, publisher and scope of the NVvO profile, register criteria and applicable legislation. Compare the NVvO professional profile, the KP criteria and the applicable decree for allied health professions, each by date and scope. The ocular motility record keeps only the conclusion that has been established for the orthoptic role. Uncertainty is stated as such. [6] [8] [9] [10]
Eye position, motility, visual acuity and binocular vision are only stated when the test used and test conditions appear from the source. The orthoptist links each outcome to the laterality, direction of gaze and date of the examination. The documentation format does not derive a score or diagnosis from separate observations. The orthoptist assesses the overall picture and the appropriate follow-up. [2] [4] [7]
In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the orthoptist uses only professionally recorded terminology for eye position and eye movements. In the ocular motility record, the term stays linked to the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions and the correct source. An observation of eye movement only becomes a professional conclusion after substantive interpretation when eye position and eye movements are worded. Before saving, the orthoptist assesses necessity, precision and readability. [2] [3] [6] [7]
The orthoptist leaves the relevant part of the ocular motility record empty if the source after an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function contains no information about binocular vision. A detail about the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions that is not mentioned stays unknown. The orthoptist asks targeted follow-up questions or states in the ocular motility record that information about binocular vision is missing. [2] [3]
Where there are contradictions about motility and the coordination of the eyes, the orthoptist keeps source, moment and wording separately in the ocular motility record. During an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the orthoptist compares the relevant parts of the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up. A term about eye position or motility is corrected on the basis of the test note and the correct laterality when correcting motility and the coordination of the eyes. [2] [3]
The boundary around the amblyopia data is that the report layout for eye position and eye movement does not make an ophthalmological diagnosis, urgency assessment or referral. Eye position, motility, visual acuity and binocular interpretation stay separate for the amblyopia data in the ocular motility record. A convincing wording for an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function does not replace a missing source. The practitioner determines the overall picture, referral question and treatment choice from the complete eye examination for the interpretation of the amblyopia data. [2] [3]
For a striking eye position, motility finding or change in binocular vision, the ocular motility record keeps laterality, direction and test conditions. The orthoptist also states the reported complaint and the specific follow-up appointment. The documentation format does not itself choose urgency, a medical cause or referral. The orthoptist makes and checks that professional judgement themselves. [2] [3]
In an orthoptic examination, the reported complaint, the observed eye position and the motility or binocular test carried out stay separately readable. The orthoptist links each result to laterality, direction and test conditions. A professional conclusion and treatment agreement then go into their own part. The documentation format does not turn separate observations into an independent decision on referral or treatment. [4]
Eye position, motility and binocular vision are recorded with the test and test conditions actually used. A description is not automatically converted into a code, score or amblyopia classification. The documentation format does not calculate a missing value. The orthoptist checks laterality and result and decides which professional conclusion or treatment agreement fits with them. [2] [3] [7]
Change in complaints, eye position and binocular function is not combined into one score. For the evaluation moment, the orthoptist tracks, in the ocular motility record, the certainty of the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up. During an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, a reported change stays separate from the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions and the assessment by the orthoptist. The report layout for eye position and eye movement does not provide an ocular motility practice with any proof of efficacy or causal relationship. [2] [5]
Before saving to the ocular motility record, compare the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions with the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up. If information about feedback to those involved is missing, that part stays open. The orthoptist removes from the report text for the ocular motility record any autonomous ophthalmological diagnosis, urgency assessment or referral. For feedback to those involved, read back eye position, motility and visual acuity separately and leave the professional overall picture to the practitioner. [2] [5]
For an orthoptics practice, Hysio's general subscription price applies first, with Starter from €20 per month, excl. VAT. The pricing page shows what currently applies. There is no separate rate for the orthoptic consultation, the intake with examination or the evaluation. Compare the plan with the number of eye contacts per month. [13]
Oculomotor data, test results and information from a client or companion are included in the record in a purpose-bound way. Under the GDPR, the practice arranges access, keeps laterality and source and checks a recipient before feedback. The orthoptist decides which data are necessary. The profession-specific documentation formats themselves do not give permission for sharing; that remains a decision of the orthoptist. [14] [15]
For the ocular motility record, the orthoptist compares writing by hand with dictation. In an examination of eye position, motility and binocular function, the Hysio format for the ocular motility record is intended as a third option. Within an ocular motility practice, each way of working requires review of the request for help, eye position, motility, visual acuity, binocular findings and the agreed follow-up. A general chatbot does not automatically know the fixating eye, laterality, test used, result and measurement conditions. For an ocular motility practice, the Hysio format therefore remains one of the options alongside handwriting and dictation. [2]
Within an ocular motility practice, the Hysio trial, including the orthoptic documentation formats, lasts 14 days. For each trial contact, assess laterality, motility, test conditions, faithfulness to the source, the professional conclusion and the time that corrections take. The orthoptist decides whether the checked text fits the original examination source and which next step is agreed within the practice. [13]
No, the report layout does not promise an automatic connection with every record system for ocular motility. The orthoptist reads the text through and transfers it into their own record, in the usual format of the practice. Laterality, test conditions and professional conclusion stay recognisable with their original source. A technical connection differs per system and is not part of this documentation format. [2]
The orthoptist assesses laterality, test conditions, motility and binocular findings against the original examination notes. The professional conclusion, treatment choice and any feedback remain the orthoptist's decision. Within the practice, it is determined in advance who may keep the reviewed version. The documentation format does not turn an oculomotor observation into a diagnosis or independent follow-up advice. [2] [3]
Correct an error in laterality, test conditions or motility outcome from the original orthoptic examination source. The orthoptist makes clear whether only a test detail changes or whether the professional conclusion and treatment agreement have also been reassessed. The record keeps the earlier text, the reviewer and the version that then counts as final. [2] [3]
If a treatment agreement is missing, the orthoptist first consults the plan or evaluation part of the same contact. A test result about eye position or motility may not be interpreted as an agreement. If the second source does not mention anything either, the follow-up stays open or is checked. The documentation format does not make a treatment choice from examination data. [2] [3]
The eye care practice compares time for the same kind of evaluation and under the same circumstances. Dictation, checking of laterality and test conditions, professional assessment, corrections and feedback each get their own duration. No time savings have been established, so a general percentage does not fit. Compare over several evaluations whether admin with AI really frees up time in your practice. [2]
Prepare the introduction with one clearly defined ocular motility case and an orthoptist who checks every report text. Make local agreements about laterality, test conditions, professional conclusion, feedback and storage. Wider use is only appropriate after the first records have been processed faithfully to the source and without unwanted additions. Decide in advance who reviews the trial texts and which corrections then still turn out to be needed. [2]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.