Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Acupuncture
Hysio organises acupuncture contacts around the care request, complaint history, recorded findings, treatment and final evaluation in the record.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
Hysio distinguishes between the acupuncture intake, the treatment report and the final evaluation. The source structure keeps the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, recorded treatment and the perspectives of the client and the practitioner separate. No statutory protection of title, national measurement set or efficacy is assumed.
For each type of contact, you can read here what Hysio records about the complaint, tongue, pulse and point selection, and what you assess yourself as an acupuncturist.
For the treatment record, Hysio Acupuncture Treatment Report remains a format centred on an acupuncture treatment with source-bound diagnostics, point selection, technique, response and follow-up. This applies to a contact with a review of systems and treatment. Complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue, pulse, point selection and professional interpretation keep their own origin with the care request and the main complaint in the treatment record. For the care request and the main complaint, compare point name, side, technique and client response literally with the treatment source. [1] [3]
For the acupuncture intake with complaint course, review of systems, examination, plan and separate consent, Hysio Acupuncture Intake is intended for the treatment record. This format fits a contact with a review of systems and treatment. In the treatment record, the acupuncturist links "Summary" to the first information source. "Registration, main complaint and other complaints" stays separately readable for a contact with a review of systems and treatment. An unknown point name, side, technique or duration stays missing in the treatment record if information about the complaint history is missing. For the complaint history, compare point name, side, technique and client response literally with the treatment source. [1] [4]
Hysio Acupuncture Final Evaluation is for a final evaluation with client outcome, professional perspective, course of treatment and aftercare in the treatment record. In a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the acupuncturist keeps the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings and professional interpretation separately recognisable. Named finding, point side, any scale, technique and treatment date stay linked when the review of systems is recorded. The practitioner determines TCM interpretation, point selection, treatment and safety decision for the interpretation of the review of systems. [1] [5]
Hysio Acupuncture Intake is for a first contact with care request, complaint history, review of systems, relevant findings and the plan discussed. Complaint narrative, tongue and pulse findings and professional interpretation stay separately traceable; missing data remain open. The acupuncturist determines which parts of the examination were carried out and approves the treatment record. After the intake, Hysio Acupuncture Treatment Report continues the documentation for the follow-up contact. [1] [2] [4]
Hysio Acupuncture Intake organises the information from the described contact within the treatment record. In a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the acupuncturist can organise the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, professional interpretation, point selection and response. Their origin stays visible in the treatment record for the palpation findings and localisation. In the treatment record, the acupuncturist does not fill in a missing item about the palpation findings and localisation. For the palpation findings and localisation, compare point name, side, technique and client response literally with the treatment source. This way, voice-driven reporting keeps point selection and client response separately traceable. [1] [2] [4]
For a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the report design for acupuncture treatments remains a profession-focused structure and does not produce a medical diagnosis, TCM pattern, point selection or efficacy claim. If the professional interpretation is missing, the acupuncturist leaves that place open in the treatment record. A traditional term is not inferred from isolated complaints and is not translated into a medical diagnosis when the professional interpretation is worded. Only the acupuncturist can add a conclusion or choice for the treatment record. [1] [2] [3]
In the treatment record, the acupuncturist separates the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, professional interpretation, point selection and response based on their actual origin. Around the point selection and technique, what the client said stays visible in a contact with a review of systems and treatment. The acupuncturist places the observation about the point selection and technique in the treatment record next to the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date. Professional interpretation gets its own origin and assessment with the acupuncturist. [1] [2] [3]
Before saving to the treatment record, the acupuncturist places the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date next to the original note. For the response during or after the contact, compare point name, side, technique and client response literally with the treatment source. The acupuncturist later saves only a version of the treatment record in which origin and terminology are correct. [1] [2] [3]
A treatment report has no promised automatic link with every medical record system. When the treatment record is handed over, the acupuncturist specifically assesses point name, side, technique, treatment date, consent answer and verified recipient. The practice's working method for the treatment record determines the format within a complementary care practice. Access and version control stay linked to the treatment record. The report design for acupuncture treatments does not prove any technical integration for the treatment record; the handover remains human work. [1] [2] [5]
For the treatment record, the acupuncturist chooses between treatment report, intake and final evaluation based on the actual purpose of contact. The intake organises complaint history, review of systems and consent, the treatment report records diagnostics and delivery, and the final evaluation separates client outcome from professional assessment. The acupuncturist then checks whether source, action carried out and follow-up appointment are complete and traceable in the treatment record. [1] [2] [5]
The acupuncturist records the care request and the main complaint in the treatment record with origin and time of contact. In a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the acupuncturist links the time of contact and care goal to the care request and the main complaint. Hysio Acupuncture Intake is intended to keep the tongue and pulse findings separate. If information about the care request and the main complaint is missing, that passage stays open. For the care request and the main complaint, compare point name, side, technique and client response literally with the treatment source. [2] [4]
The complaint history stays recognisable in the treatment record as the client's account. Review of systems, tongue and pulse findings and palpation are recorded separately with their time of contact. The acupuncturist then describes professional interpretation and point selection in separate sections. The intake format does not infer a TCM pattern, medical diagnosis or efficacy claim from a description of complaints. [2] [4]
Record the review of systems in the treatment record at the intake, keeping the client's words and the system that was reviewed. Tongue and pulse findings, palpation and professional interpretation then each get their own place with visible origin. Hysio Acupuncture Intake is intended for this. The acupuncturist determines which connections have been professionally established and approves the final text. [2] [4]
Describe tongue and pulse findings as they were recorded during the contact concerned, with the correct time and without filling in missing characteristics. An earlier note stays a separate source. If descriptions differ, the acupuncturist assesses the meaning personally and leaves the uncertainty visible. The documentation format does not infer a TCM pattern or medical diagnosis. [2] [4]
In the treatment record, the acupuncturist gives the palpation findings and localisation the same certainty as the original source. A traditional term is not inferred from isolated complaints. Nor is it translated into a medical diagnosis. Put the professional term next to the goal of the treatment. What a finding means is for you to decide. [2] [4]
In the treatment record, the acupuncturist selects around the professional interpretation only context that clarifies the purpose of a contact with a review of systems and treatment. Think of the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date, provided the source contains that data. The complementary care practice limits systems and treatment data to the agreed care goal for data about the professional interpretation. Hysio Acupuncture Treatment Report leaves out background that is not relevant; the acupuncturist decides what is readable and necessary. [2] [3]
Link the point selection and technique in the treatment record only to a measurement or observation that was actually carried out in a contact with a review of systems and treatment. The acupuncturist notes the known method, location or side, outcome and date as far as the source shows them. Suitable examples are tongue, pulse or palpation findings when you actually name them, without assuming a uniform national measurement set; only an observation or measure that was actually used belongs in the report. The professional meaning remains for the acupuncturist to assess. [2] [3]
Connect the response during or after the contact in the treatment record with a goal that the acupuncturist discussed or professionally established during a contact with a review of systems and treatment. Keep the care request and the main complaint separate; the acupuncturist then notes the follow-up action, the person responsible and the appropriate evaluation moment. The documentation format Hysio Acupuncture Treatment Report does not create a plan from isolated data. The practitioner determines TCM interpretation, point selection, treatment and safety decision for the interpretation of the response during or after the contact. [2] [3]
Hysio Acupuncture Final Evaluation is for a review of the course of treatment, the outcome according to the client, the professional assessment and the agreed aftercare. This evaluation format is not chosen automatically. The acupuncturist compares the source set with the actual evaluation contact, keeps missing outcomes open and decides which end date and follow-up appointment belong in the treatment record. [2] [5]
In a final evaluation, the treatment record states the end date, the outcome according to the client and the professional assessment as separate sources. The acupuncturist describes the recorded course of treatment and notes which aftercare or referral back was actually agreed. A missing outcome or open safety question stays recognisably in place. Only the reviewed and approved version may later be saved. [2] [5]
The NVA professional profile is a professional source for members; association rules are not a general law and the title has no BIG status of its own. The treatment record names the NVA professional profile, association rules and the applicable legal framework with publisher, date and type of source. In a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the treatment record shows the legal status. A complementary care practice separates professional standards from government rules. [6] [7] [11]
No national profession-specific record-keeping guideline for every acupuncturist was found; NVA frameworks apply within their own scope and the WGBO only where the underlying legal treatment relationship supports it. For the complaint history, the acupuncturist uses only the applicable part of the NVA professional profile, association rules and the applicable legal framework. The treatment record keeps the document version and scope. In a contact with a review of systems and treatment, a local agreement stays recognisably local. [6] [7] [13]
An acupuncturist may also practise a regulated healthcare profession, but that capacity and authority are established separately. In the treatment record, the legal position of acupuncturist stands apart from a second care role. The acupuncturist only states a demonstrable status for a contact with a review of systems and treatment. Another capacity is assessed separately for the treatment record. [11]
The Wkkgz also covers complementary care providers and the IGJ supervises safety, without thereby confirming efficacy or BIG authority. After a contact with a review of systems and treatment, a notification in the treatment record contains facts, date and follow-up. A complementary care practice chooses the applicable complaints procedure. The treatment record contains facts and no independent legal judgement. [14] [12] [15]
The WGBO period is only mentioned when the legal treatment relationship supports it; twenty years is not a stand-alone universal acupuncture rule and does not follow independently from an NVA regulation. The treatment record states the legal treatment relationship, legal basis and policy version on which the chosen retention period rests. The practice reassesses changes; an NVA membership or a general reference to acupuncture does not automatically make twenty years applicable. [7] [13]
NVA, Zhong and NAAV apply their own private membership or quality requirements; a BIG registration can only belong to a separately regulated profession. An NVA membership or affiliation with Zhong or NAAV is only mentioned with the association name, validity and date of verification. The treatment record keeps such private quality data separate from any BIG registration in a second professional role. The current association page is used as a source before publication. [8] [9] [10] [11]
For an acupuncture treatment, record the question asked, the answer given and the moment; recording or disclosure is only mentioned separately when it was discussed, with purpose and recipient. For each consent moment, note the purpose, the recipient and whether it concerned the treatment itself, recording or disclosure, so that none of the three is inferred from another. The acupuncturist does not fill in an answer based on silence. [4]
An acupuncture handover contains only the necessary complaint, finding, treatment and follow-up data for the agreed recipient. Leave out what the recipient does not need for their own action, and note what you left out so that the limitation stays traceable. The acupuncturist checks consent, source and recipient before the text is shared. [5] [7] [13]
Point selection, professional interpretation and safety decisions stay with the acupuncturist and are never inferred from source fragments. In the treatment record, the structure can separate the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, professional interpretation, point selection and response. You interpret the treatment yourself. With voice-driven admin too, the follow-up and the saved version remain your work. [2] [3]
Legislation, IGJ pages, professional profile and association regulations are each assessed separately for date, publisher and scope. Compare the NVA professional profile and the association rules separately with current BIG and IGJ information. The treatment record makes visible which source carries the professional content, private membership rule or legal safety boundary. An unclear scope stays explicitly open. [6] [7] [11] [12]
Tongue, pulse and palpation findings are descriptions from the contact concerned and not automatically calculated scores. Another outcome measure is only mentioned if the practitioner actually used it, with method, value and date. The documentation format does not fill in a missing finding and does not infer a TCM pattern. The acupuncturist personally determines the professional meaning and the follow-up. [2] [4] [6]
In a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the acupuncturist uses only professionally recorded terminology for the complaint history. In the treatment record, the term stays linked to the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date and the correct source. A traditional term is not inferred from isolated complaints and is not translated into a medical diagnosis when the complaint history is worded. Before saving, the acupuncturist assesses necessity, precision and readability. [2] [3] [6] [7]
The acupuncturist leaves the relevant part of the treatment record empty if the source contains no information about the review of systems after a contact with a review of systems and treatment. A detail about the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date that was not mentioned stays unknown. The acupuncturist asks targeted follow-up questions or states in the treatment record that information about the review of systems is missing. [2] [4]
When information about the tongue and pulse findings conflicts, the acupuncturist keeps source, moment and wording separately in the treatment record. During a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the acupuncturist compares the relevant parts of the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, professional interpretation, point selection and response. When the tongue and pulse findings are corrected, a term about point selection or technique is restored from the treatment source, keeping side and delivery. [2] [4]
The boundary around the palpation findings and localisation is that the report design for acupuncture treatments does not produce a medical diagnosis, TCM pattern, point selection or efficacy claim. Complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue, pulse, point selection and professional interpretation keep their own origin with the palpation findings and localisation in the treatment record. Persuasive wording for a contact with a review of systems and treatment does not replace a missing source. The practitioner determines TCM interpretation, point selection, treatment and safety decision for the interpretation of the palpation findings and localisation. [2] [4]
In the event of a warning sign, the treatment record captures what the client reports, what the acupuncturist observed and which follow-up action was discussed. Any second, legally regulated care role is named and assessed separately. The documentation format does not establish medical urgency or referral. The practitioner safeguards the safety boundary personally and checks the text before saving. [2] [3]
An acupuncture report keeps the client's response apart from the tongue, pulse and palpation findings that the practitioner recorded. Point name, side, technique and treatment date stay with the treatment carried out. The acupuncturist describes professional interpretation separately and personally assesses the connection. The structure does not infer a TCM pattern, medical diagnosis or efficacy claim from these different information sources. [4]
Tongue, pulse and palpation findings are not automatically normalised into a TCM pattern, point code or medical diagnosis. Point name, side and technique are only recorded when they appear in the treatment source. The documentation format does not fill in a classification or score. The acupuncturist checks the terminology and personally determines which professional interpretation and treatment were actually recorded. [2] [3] [6]
Client outcome, professional evaluation and treatment response do not form a general efficacy claim. For a final evaluation, the acupuncturist follows in the treatment record the certainty of the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, professional interpretation, point selection and response. During a contact with a review of systems and treatment, a reported change stays separate from the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date and the assessment by the acupuncturist. For a complementary care practice, the report design for acupuncture treatments provides no proof of efficacy or causal link. [2] [5] [12]
Before saving to the treatment record, compare the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date with the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, professional interpretation, point selection and response. If information about the aftercare and end date is missing, that part stays open. The acupuncturist removes from the report text for the treatment record any autonomous medical diagnosis, TCM pattern, point selection or efficacy claim. For the aftercare and end date, compare point name, side, technique and client response literally with the treatment source. [2] [5]
The pricing page lists Starter from €20 per month, excl. VAT, for the general Hysio offering. For an acupuncture practice, the intake, treatment and final evaluation formats are each linked to their own record purpose. Compare current terms, contact volume and record route before you choose. There is no separate rate for voice-driven reporting in acupuncture. [16]
Complaint data, tongue and pulse descriptions, point selection and treatment responses are only processed for a demonstrable record purpose. Under the GDPR, the acupuncture practice arranges who may review the treatment record and which information goes to an assessed recipient. The acupuncturist safeguards necessity and origin. The profession-specific formats do not determine what is saved or shared. [17] [18]
For the treatment record, the acupuncturist compares writing by hand with dictation. In a contact with a review of systems and treatment, the Hysio documentation format is intended as a third option. Within a complementary care practice, every method requires review of the complaint narrative, review of systems, tongue and pulse findings, professional interpretation, point selection and response. A general chatbot does not automatically know the named finding, point side, any scale, technique and date. The acupuncturist therefore always checks what is included in the treatment record. [2]
In a complementary care practice, the general Hysio trial lasts 14 days. During that period, assess above all whether point name, side, technique and client response keep following the source. Also check whether a missing outcome stays visibly open and whether the follow-up is only mentioned when it was discussed in the contact. The acupuncturist makes the final choice. [16]
An acupuncture report does not link automatically to every medical record system; Hysio does not promise any technical integration. The acupuncturist exports or copies the text personally to the chosen system of the complementary care practice, in the format that system requires. Before saving, the acupuncturist compares point name, side, technique and date with the treatment source. The handover therefore remains human work, not an automatic link. [2]
The acupuncturist compares complaint history, tongue and pulse description, point selection and treatment response with the original notes. TCM interpretation, treatment choice and safety considerations stay entirely with the practitioner and are not generated by the documentation format. Only after that check does the practice save a version. The design organises source information but does not establish a medical diagnosis or efficacy. [2] [3]
An error in point name, side, technique or treatment date is corrected from the original treatment note. The acupuncturist keeps the earlier version and checks whether the change has consequences for professional interpretation, client response or aftercare. The treatment record states who reviewed the change and which verified version is then saved. [2] [3]
When the response during or after a treatment is missing, the acupuncturist checks only an explicit client note from the same contact. Tongue, pulse or palpation findings may not replace that response. If there is no second source, the practitioner asks targeted follow-up questions or leaves the section unknown. The documentation format does not assume a treatment outcome. [2] [3]
Measure administration time for the same type of final evaluation, so that course of treatment and aftercare stay comparable. The acupuncturist keeps separate track each time of dictation, checking of complaint, point data and client response, corrections and saving to the record. The profession-specific formats currently deliver no established time savings. Without a local baseline measurement, no general savings percentage is given. [2]
For the introduction, choose one treatment contact and have the acupuncturist fully review the first report texts. The practice describes in advance how complaint history, tongue and pulse, point data, client response, aftercare and saving are verified. Expansion only follows once a small series of reports stays faithful to the source and adds no medical diagnosis or effect claim. [2]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.