Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Osteopathy
Hysio organises osteopathic care encounters around the request for help, case history, examination findings, discussed care plan and evaluation.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
Hysio gives osteopathic documentation moments a fixed source structure without taking over the professional interpretation. The request for help, case history, physical findings, agreements and evaluation stay clearly separate. This page makes no statement about efficacy and leaves medical conclusions solely with the osteopath.
Here you can see, for each contact, what Hysio records about the complaint narrative, palpation and movement examination, and which analysis stays with you as an osteopath.
Hysio Osteopathic Consultation is intended for a consultation with case history and physical examination, and organises the account of the complaint, findings, care agreements and the client's response each as a separate part. Findings and care agreements stay clearly apart from what the client has said. The osteopath determines the professional interpretation and the agreed follow-up. [1] [3]
Hysio Osteopathic Intake organises the case history, the request for help and the relevant medical history for a first contact. If part of the case history is missing in this contact, that passage stays open instead of the format filling it in. The osteopath checks the source and decides which follow-up question or agreement goes into the record. [1] [4]
Hysio Osteopathic Examination and Treatment Report is the format for physical examination and treatment, with separate origins for finding and interpretation in the examination record. In an encounter with case history and physical examination, the osteopath keeps the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation with their original source of information. The examined region, method, described function and moment of contact accompany every physical finding when palpation and movement findings are recorded. After their own consideration, the osteopath connects examination, professional analysis and the discussed care plan when interpreting the palpation and movement findings. [1] [5]
Hysio Osteopathic Evaluation organises the examination findings, the response to the course of care and the follow-up. A part that was not examined stays visibly empty in the report. The osteopath links only findings that were actually discussed to the evaluation and records the closing agreement separately. [1] [6]
Hysio Osteopathic Consultation organises the information from the described contact within the examination record. In an encounter with case history and physical examination, the osteopath can organise the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation. Their origin stays visible in the examination record for the professional analysis. In the examination record, the osteopath does not fill in a missing detail about the professional analysis. While assessing the professional analysis, keep the account of the complaint separate from palpation and professional interpretation. With voice-driven reporting, the osteopathic analysis therefore remains yours. [1] [2] [3]
For an encounter with case history and physical examination, the report outline for osteopathic examination remains a profession-oriented structure and does not make a medical diagnosis, efficacy claim or treatment outcome. If the discussed care plan is missing, the osteopath leaves that place in the examination record open. An assumed physical connection is only included when the osteopath has interpreted it while formulating the discussed care plan. Only the osteopath can add a conclusion or choice for the examination record. [1] [2] [3]
In the examination record, the osteopath separates the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation on the basis of their actual origin. In an encounter with case history and physical examination, what the client said stays visible around a contact report. The osteopath places the observation from a contact report in the examination record alongside the examined body region, method, described function and time. Professional interpretation is given its own origin and assessment by the osteopath. [1] [2] [3]
Before saving to the examination record, the osteopath compares the examined body region, method, described function and time with the original note. While assessing the client's response, keep the account of the complaint separate from palpation and professional interpretation. The osteopath later saves only a version of the examination record in which origin and terminology are correct. [1] [2] [3]
The examination record has no guaranteed automatic connection with every medical record system. When handing over the examination record, the osteopath specifically assesses the complaint wording, palpatory finding, professional analysis, contact date and chosen recipient. The practice's working method for the examination record determines the format within a practice for body-oriented care. Access and version control stay linked to the examination record. The report outline for osteopathic examination does not prove technical integration for the examination record; the handover remains human work. [1] [2] [6]
For the examination record, the osteopath chooses between consultation, intake, examination with treatment and evaluation on the basis of the actual purpose of contact. A first request for help belongs with the intake, physical findings with the treatment carried out belong with the examination and treatment report, ongoing care with the consultation and looking back with the evaluation. The contact formats for this body-oriented care are intended for recording the closure and the follow-up. In the examination record, the osteopath makes that final choice personally. [1] [2] [6]
Hysio Osteopathic Intake keeps the examination findings separate from the request for help and the account of the complaint. Note what the client reports, what you observed during the examination and which professional question follows from it. Missing data stay visibly open and the osteopath decides which interpretation and agreement actually belong in the record. [2] [4]
In the examination record, the account of the complaint and the case history remain a representation of what the client reports. Palpatory and movement findings belong to the physical examination that was carried out, with region, method and contact date. The osteopath writes the professional analysis separately. The intake format itself does not turn a description of a complaint into a diagnosis or causal connection. [2] [4]
Within the osteopathic intake, the examination, the discussed care plan and the evaluation, you record palpation and movement findings in the phase where this part belongs. In an encounter with case history and physical examination, assess that place in conjunction with the request for help, the examination, the professional conclusion and the plan. The Hysio Osteopathic Examination and Treatment Report documentation format preserves that structure without deriving a cause or choice from the palpation and movement findings themselves. For palpation and movement findings, the methodical choice stays with the osteopath; they approve the text. [2] [5]
Carry over an examination finding only with the body region, method used and contact date from the same osteopathic note. The account of the complaint and the palpatory finding remain different sources. If records do not match, the osteopath checks the original record and describes the uncertainty. The outline does not choose an analysis and does not establish a causal connection. [2] [5]
In the examination record, the osteopath gives the professional analysis the same certainty as the original source. An assumed physical connection only goes into the report if you have interpreted it yourself. Put the professional term next to the goal of the contact. Voice-driven reporting does not turn a suspicion into an established connection. [2] [5]
Around the discussed care plan, the osteopath chooses only context in the examination record that clarifies the purpose of an encounter with case history and physical examination. In the examination record, this may concern the examined body region, method, described function and time, provided the source contains these data. For data about the discussed care plan, the practice limits sensitive case history to what the discussed purpose of the physical examination requires. Hysio Osteopathic Consultation leaves out of the text whatever does not contribute to that purpose; the osteopath remains the one who decides what is readable and necessary. [2] [3]
In an osteopathic contact report, record only observations or measurements that were actually carried out during the physical examination. Keep the examined body region, method, described function and moment of contact with the original examination note. An outcome measure that was not administered stays out of the documentation format. The osteopath keeps the account of the complaint, palpatory finding and professional analysis separate and gives meaning to the examination personally. [2] [3]
In the examination record, connect the client's response to a goal that the osteopath discussed or professionally established during an encounter with case history and physical examination. Keep the request for help and the account of the complaint apart; the osteopath then notes the follow-up action, the person responsible and the appropriate moment of evaluation. The Hysio Osteopathic Consultation documentation format does not create a plan from loose data. After their own consideration, the osteopath connects examination, professional analysis and the discussed care plan when interpreting the client's response. [2] [3]
For the evaluation of progress, Hysio Osteopathic Evaluation is the documentation format that most closely fits an encounter with case history and physical examination. In the examination record, the osteopath compares the required set of sources and structure with the actual documentation moment. The report outline for osteopathic examination selects nothing independently. After their own consideration, the osteopath connects examination, professional analysis and the discussed care plan when interpreting the evaluation of progress. [2] [6]
At closure, the examination record separately states the result according to the client, the most recently recorded physical findings, the professional analysis and the discussed follow-up. The osteopath leaves regions that were not examined and uncertain connections recognisably open. This documentation format does not make an efficacy claim or closure decision. The practitioner approves the final text and saves only the relevant version. [2] [6]
The osteopathic professional profile and the NRO regulations provide private professional frameworks; the unprotected title has no article 3 or article 34 status. The examination record names the NVO professional profile and the NRO registration criteria with publisher, date and type of source. In an encounter with case history and physical examination, the examination record shows the legal status. A practice for body-oriented care separates professional standards from government rules. [7] [10] [9] [11]
Record a practice-specific agreement separately from what the guideline prescribes, stating the version you followed. Also note why the agreement was relevant in this contact and which source supports the choice. The osteopath assesses the text before it is saved in line with the local record arrangements. [8]
The title osteopath is not legally protected; another regulated care role of the same practitioner must be established separately. In the examination record, the legal position as an osteopath is kept separate from a second care role. The osteopath states only a demonstrable status for an encounter with case history and physical examination. Another capacity is assessed separately for the examination record. [11]
Where the Wkkgz applies, an osteopathy practice records complaint information and follow-up factually alongside the designated disputes route. After an encounter with case history and physical examination, a complaint logged in the examination record is given its facts, date and follow-up. A practice for body-oriented care chooses the applicable complaints procedure. The examination record contains facts and no independent legal judgement. [13]
The retention period of the treatment record depends on the legal treatment relationship and applicable rules, not on NRO registration alone. With the examination record, the osteopath notes the legal treatment relationship, the chosen legal basis and the version of the retention policy. NRO enrolment does not replace that assessment. A changed relationship or rule is weighed again first before the recorded period changes. [8] [12]
NRO enrolment follows private assessment criteria and must not be described as BIG registration or a statutory professional qualification. An NRO enrolment is recorded with the register name, conditions of validity and the date on which it was verified. The examination record keeps private registration, professional title and any second regulated care role separately readable. The current register entry is verified directly with the NRO. [10] [9] [11]
In an osteopathic examination, you record the specific consent question and the answer; recording and any handover are only mentioned when they were actually discussed. The osteopath keeps the specific question about examination, treatment or recording alongside the answer given and the contact date. Any handover only goes into the examination record when it was actually discussed, with purpose and recipient. Continuing the contact is not interpreted as an answer in its own right. [4] [8]
Share only the necessary account of the complaint, the relevant finding and the agreed follow-up with a verified recipient. For a handover from the examination record, the osteopath checks care purpose, recipient and scope of data. In an encounter with case history and physical examination, the examination record keeps the client's words apart from the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation. A practice for body-oriented care uses the verified destination and local method of sending. [6] [8] [12]
The osteopath determines the professional analysis and choice of treatment; Hysio may not add a medical diagnosis or efficacy conclusion. In the examination record, the structure can separate the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation. For an encounter with case history and physical examination, the osteopath determines the interpretation personally. The follow-up in the examination record and the saved version remain professional work. [2] [3]
When the NRO rules or the professional profile change, reassess the effective date, target group and relationship between profile and register requirements. Compare the NVO professional profile with the current NRO register requirements and record which document supports the specific claim. The examination record keeps the effective date, target group and any replacement of the earlier passage. An unclear version stays out of use. [7] [10] [9]
Palpatory and movement findings are only included with the examined body region, method and contact date. An outcome measure belongs in the examination record only if the osteopath actually administered it. The outline does not fill in any value or examination finding. The professional analysis follows separately and does not turn the measurement into a medical diagnosis or proof of treatment effect. [2] [5] [8]
In an encounter with case history and physical examination, the osteopath uses only professionally recorded terminology for the case history. In the examination record, the term stays linked to the examined body region, method, described function and time and the correct source. An assumed physical connection is only included when the osteopath has interpreted it while formulating the case history. Before saving, the osteopath assesses necessity, precision and readability. [2] [3] [7] [8]
The osteopath keeps the relevant part of the examination record empty if the source after an encounter with case history and physical examination contains no information about palpation and movement findings. A detail about the examined body region, method, described function and time that was not mentioned stays unknown. The osteopath asks targeted questions or states in the examination record that information about palpation and movement findings is missing. [2] [5]
When information about the examination findings conflicts, the osteopath keeps source, moment and wording separately in the examination record. During an encounter with case history and physical examination, the osteopath compares the relevant parts of the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation. A physical finding is corrected from the case history or examination note, not from assumptions when correcting the examination findings. [2] [5]
The boundary around the professional analysis is that the report outline for osteopathic examination does not make a medical diagnosis, efficacy claim or treatment outcome. The account of the complaint, palpatory finding and professional analysis each keep their own origin for the professional analysis in the examination record. A convincing wording for an encounter with case history and physical examination does not replace a missing source. After their own consideration, the osteopath connects examination, professional analysis and the discussed care plan when interpreting the professional analysis. [2] [3]
A reported red flag stays separate in the examination record from a palpatory or movement finding by the osteopath. The practitioner notes the examined region, the moment of contact and the specific follow-up agreement without filling in a medical cause. The outline does not perform triage and does not choose urgency or referral. The professional safety assessment is made and verified outside the documentation. [2] [3]
An osteopathic contact report keeps the complaint narrative separate from palpatory and movement findings from the physical examination. With a finding, the osteopath states the examined region, method and contact date and then writes the professional analysis separately. The client's response in turn remains another source of information. Voice-driven admin does not turn that combination into a medical diagnosis, causal connection or proof of treatment effect. [5]
A client response, palpatory finding or movement observation stays ordinary source-bound text in the examination record. The outline does not turn it into a score, medical diagnosis or causal classification. Only an outcome measure that was actually administered may be stated with name, value, method and date. The osteopath assesses the meaning and writes the professional analysis separately. [2] [3] [8]
The client's response, physical finding and professional judgement do not form a general efficacy claim. For the evaluation of progress, the osteopath follows, in the examination record, the certainty of the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation. During an encounter with case history and physical examination, a reported change stays separate from the examined body region, method, described function and time and from the osteopath's assessment. The report outline for osteopathic examination provides no proof of efficacy or causal connection for a practice for body-oriented care. [2] [6]
At closure, the reason for ending care, the agreements made and the follow-up are each stated separately, so that they do not merge into one conclusion. Also note which findings come from the contact and which response the client gave personally. The osteopath reads through the text before the record is finalised. [2] [6]
For an osteopathy practice, the general Hysio price starts with Starter from €20 per month, excl. VAT. The current terms are on the pricing page and also apply to the osteopathic documentation formats. There is no separate rate for voice-driven reporting in osteopathy. [14]
Complaint data, physical findings and professional analysis are only processed for the specific purpose of the osteopathic contact. Under the GDPR, the practice determines who may view the examination record and checks a recipient before a handover. The osteopath keeps sensitive medical history limited and source-bound. The documentation formats themselves do not decide which information is shared; that remains a decision of the osteopath. [15] [16]
For the examination record, the osteopath compares writing by hand with dictation. In an encounter with case history and physical examination, the Hysio format for the examination record is a third option. Within a practice for body-oriented care, every working method calls for assessment of the account of the complaint, case history, palpatory finding, professional analysis, discussed care plan and evaluation. A general chatbot does not automatically know the examined body region, method, described function and time. For a practice for body-oriented care, the Hysio format thus remains one of the options alongside handwriting and dictation. [2]
Hysio has a trial period of fourteen days. Use that period to assess comparable osteopathic contacts for faithfulness to the source, correction time and readability. The osteopath checks every report personally and decides which parts are usable for their own record and which adjustment is still needed. [14]
Hysio does not offer guaranteed automatic integration with every osteopathic record system. For the examination record, a connection depends on the specific system that a practice for body-oriented care uses and on the arrangements that exist with the supplier about it. Without such a connection, handover remains manual: the osteopath copies or exports the text to their own system. For a specific practice, check which connection the record system in use actually supports. [2]
The osteopath compares the account of the complaint, physical findings, professional analysis and the client's response with their original contact source. They determine the meaning, choice of treatment and closure personally and prevent the text from suggesting a medical diagnosis or effect claim. The practice appoints a person responsible for saving. The outline can structure the examination record, but does not take over any decision on content. [2] [3]
Correct complaint wording, palpatory findings and professional analysis only from the source that belongs to the same contact. The osteopath keeps the earlier wording and makes clear which part of the examination record has been changed. They then check that no new diagnosis, causality or effect claim has arisen and record the final version. [2] [3]
When the client's response is missing, the osteopath looks only at an explicit response in the contact or evaluation note. A palpatory finding or professional analysis is not a substitute for the client's perspective. If that second source is not there, the result stays unknown or is asked about. The outline does not formulate an assumed effect. [2] [3]
An osteopathy practice measures the administrative process for comparable examination or evaluation contacts. Track dictation, checking of complaint and palpatory findings, professional analysis, corrections and saving as separate times, so that a savings claim can only be substantiated with their own measurement. The osteopath bases a later conclusion solely on their own measurement. [2]
Designate one reviewer and record the local saving steps. First verify region, physical finding, professional analysis and the client's response in a small series. Use is scaled up only when the text stays source-bound and does not add a diagnosis or effect claim. In this way the practice builds trust step by step in the osteopathic documentation formats for consultation, intake, examination with treatment and evaluation. [2]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.