Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Wmo Support Adviser
After a kitchen table conversation, you dictate what the resident told you and what you saw. Hysio turns it into a conversation report, home visit report, investigation report or handover. The notification stays separate.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
In a Wmo investigation, the notification, living situation, own capabilities and network come together. For each contact, Hysio organises what the resident said, what others reported and what you saw yourself.
A Wmo report follows the Wmo 2015 and your municipality's agreements, and the judgement always lies with you as the support adviser.
Hysio Wmo Kitchen Table Conversation is intended for the moment of the notification. Set out the resident's request for support, what the person can do themselves, the network and the limitations investigated each separately, so they do not get mixed up. During the municipality's investigation, also separate purpose, people involved and follow-up, and afterwards compare how that write-up can be found in the Wmo record: the origin of the notification stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [3] [7] [8]
For the Wmo record, Hysio Wmo Kitchen Table Conversation organises this conversation in a recognisable way. Place the conversation in the related investigation or in the kitchen table conversation itself, and within the municipal Wmo process organise the words, the context, the observations and the agreements made. Meaning and next step then stay traceable for the Wmo support adviser in the record. [1] [2] [4] [8] [9]
Hysio Wmo Investigation Report Dictation fits the source layout for the living situation. For the living situation, record the source, the life domain, the date and what is still missing. Then, within the municipality's Wmo investigation, compare the roles and choices with that source. Only after that check does the Wmo support adviser decide what is saved in the record. [1] [2] [5] [9] [7]
For a home visit, Hysio Wmo Home Visit & Assessment has a layout for Wmo assessment. Always describe a home visit from the perspective of participation and the resident's personal situation. During the municipal Wmo investigation, keep notification, assessment and agreement separate from each other, and the Wmo support adviser only gives the go-ahead for the Wmo record once the text has been checked against the source. [1] [2] [6] [7] [8]
For own capabilities, the contact purpose determines which format fits. Record the request for support, what the resident can do themselves, the network and the limitations investigated separately from each other. During the municipality's investigation, choose between intake, evaluation and handover, and compare that write-up with the Wmo record: the origin of own capabilities stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [3] [8] [9]
For the Wmo record, a limited selection from the handover layout applies to the network. Place the network in the ongoing investigation or during the kitchen table conversation, and within the municipal Wmo process check who the recipient is, whether there is consent and which actions are still open. That way meaning and next step for the network stay traceable in the record. [1] [2] [6] [9] [7]
You organise a dictation about an investigation report in the Wmo record with the source-bound structure; Hysio Wmo Investigation Report Dictation is intended for this. Record the source, the life domain, the date and what is still missing. During the municipality's Wmo investigation, mark unintelligible passages for follow-up questions; only after that check does the Wmo support adviser decide what is saved in the record. This way, voice-driven reporting with Hysio organises the dictated investigation report, but the judgement on the request stays with you as the adviser. [1] [2] [4] [7] [8]
With information from a representative, the Wmo support adviser keeps the different perspectives separate, without merging voices. Describe this information from the perspective of participation and the resident's own situation. During the municipal investigation, keep the different perspectives visible side by side, and only once the Wmo support adviser has checked the text against the source does it go on to the Wmo record. [1] [2] [3] [8] [9]
In the Wmo record, the Wmo support adviser links the layout for a handover to the correct source. Here too, keep the request for support, own capabilities, the network and the limitations investigated recorded separately. During the municipality's investigation, state whose conclusion it is, and compare that write-up with the record: the origin of a handover stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [6] [9] [7]
Within Wmo assessment, the final check of the process status remains human work. Place the process status during the investigation itself or in the kitchen table conversation, and during the municipal Wmo investigation read the note alongside the contact. Meaning and next step for the process status then stay traceable in the Wmo record. [1] [2] [5] [7] [8]
The Wmo support adviser explicitly states the origin of the resident's words. Make sure the request for support, what the person can do themselves, the network and the limitations investigated each stay separate. Within the municipal investigation process, link role and moment of contact, so that meaning and next step for these words stay traceable in the record. [1] [2] [3] [7] [8]
In the request for support, what the client says themselves and what the Wmo support adviser observes diverge. Place the request for support in the specific investigation or during the kitchen table conversation, and during the municipality's investigation give relatives and healthcare professionals their own recognisable source role. Only after that check does the Wmo support adviser decide what about the request for support is saved in the record. [1] [2] [4] [8] [9]
Daily functioning only gains meaning with the context of the contact. Record the source, the life domain, the date and the missing information. During the municipal Wmo investigation, state who was present, at what moment and what type of information it is; only then does the Wmo support adviser check the text on daily functioning against the source, before it goes into the record. [1] [2] [5] [9] [7]
Missing information about housing and getting around simply stays open. Always describe this topic from the perspective of participation, linked to the resident's personal situation, and during the municipality's investigation create a targeted point to ask about later. Compare that write-up with the Wmo record: the origin of housing and getting around stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [6] [7] [8]
Perspectives on the network can differ considerably. So always keep the request for support, own capabilities, the network and the limitations investigated recorded separately. During the municipal investigation process, keep every statement with its own source, so that meaning and next step around the network stay traceable in the Wmo record. [1] [2] [3] [4] [8] [9]
An agreement with a deadline only has value for the Wmo support adviser with a verifiable status. Place this agreement with the investigation under way at that moment, or with the kitchen table conversation, and within the municipality's investigation record the content, the owner, the deadline and the progress. After that check, the Wmo support adviser decides for themselves what of it is saved in the record. [1] [2] [5] [9] [7]
A handover of different source data calls for purposeful selection. Add the source, the life domain, the date and what you are still missing. During the municipal Wmo investigation, go through the necessity, the consent and the receipt; the Wmo support adviser then places that text on the source data next to the source before it goes into the record. [1] [2] [6] [7] [8]
The Wmo support adviser states both the source and the degree of certainty in the Wmo record. Always describe a correction with participation and the resident's personal living situation as the starting point, and during the municipality's investigation deliberately choose words such as reported or assessed. Compare that write-up with the record: the origin of a correction stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [5] [8] [9]
If an open investigation question later turns out differently, for example after a second home visit, you note that with the date next to the first finding. Here too, keep the request for help, own capabilities, the network and the limitations investigated recorded separately. During the municipal investigation process, keep the date, the reason and the adjusted passage, so that meaning and next step stay traceable in the Wmo record. [1] [2] [4] [9] [7]
A report of a kitchen table conversation calls for a different structure than an investigation report for the formal decision. Place that choice in the investigation of that moment or in the kitchen table conversation, and within the municipality's investigation compare the headings with the chosen type of contact. Only once this has been checked does the Wmo support adviser decide what is saved about the choice of report in the record. With voice-driven reporting, you dictate the steps of the investigation in this order. [1] [2] [6] [3] [7] [8]
The Wmo 2015 requires the municipality, after a notification, to investigate the need for support and the resident's personal situation, at the latest within six weeks. The Wmo support adviser records findings and process status, but a documentation format never takes over the municipal decision. Use this legal framework during the municipality's investigation as the basis for your own assessment, and let the request for support, own capabilities, the network and the limitations investigated return separately in what you save in the Wmo record. [1] [2] [3] [7] [8]
For the investigation after a notification, the Wmo 2015, the municipal by-law and the local investigation protocol together set the direction. Place this investigation during the ongoing investigation or at the kitchen table, and during the municipality's investigation always check the role, the currency and the scope of the source. The Wmo support adviser then uses that source to assess whether the text is ready for the record. [1] [2] [4] [8] [9]
The municipal by-law must stay within the framework of the Wmo 2015 and may not restrict residents' rights; on top of that, Hysio does not add a Wmo decision, eligibility decision, medical diagnosis or tailored provision of its own. Record the source, the life domain, the date and what is still missing, and during the municipal Wmo investigation leave authority with the right healthcare professional. Compare that write-up with the Wmo record: the origin of the by-law stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [5] [9] [10]
You describe a complaint or incident factually: with the person reporting it, the cause, the specific event and the follow-up. Keep the formal assessment and the decision with the municipal executive or the authorised Wmo support adviser, because a report does not itself grant a provision. Describe the event from the perspective of participation and the individual situation of the resident involved, and during the municipality's investigation separate the process note, the record fact and the safety weighting. [1] [2] [6] [10] [7]
The retention period follows the municipal records regime and the Wmo context you work in. Check who the record holder is, what purpose the information serves and which local retention period applies before you record a period in the Wmo record. During the municipality's investigation, do not confuse the date of an event with the destruction date. The Wmo support adviser decides, after checking, what is saved about record retention. Admin with AI does not change that period. [1] [2] [3] [7] [8]
A professional or quality register says something about expertise, but gives Hysio no authority to establish self-reliance, tailored support or a Wmo decision. Place the quality registration in the investigation you are carrying out at that moment, or with the kitchen table conversation, and during the municipal Wmo investigation only include a confirmed registration status. Only after that use does the Wmo support adviser check the text on the registration against the source, before it goes into the record. [1] [2] [4] [8] [9]
Write down what the resident gave consent for, for example contact with the GP. Note the source, the life domain, the date and what is still missing, and during the municipality's investigation record the person, the purpose, the moment and the limits. Compare that write-up with the record: the origin of consent stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [5] [9] [10]
If you share something with a care provider, it is settled who receives it and for which provision. Describe this topic with the resident's participation and personal situation as your guide, and during the municipal Wmo investigation check the necessity, the legal basis, the destination and the status. That way meaning and next step around data sharing stay traceable in the Wmo record. [1] [2] [6] [10] [7]
Within Wmo assessment, interpreting the adviser's assessment stays with the authorised discipline. Here too, keep the request for support, own capabilities, the network and the limitations investigated recorded separately. During the municipality's investigation, write source and professional meaning down separately. Only after checking against the source does the Wmo support adviser decide what about the adviser's assessment is saved in the record. [1] [2] [5] [7] [8]
For sources on current rules, the Wmo support adviser always checks the owner, the version and the date. Place these rules in the investigation itself, or otherwise with the kitchen table conversation, and during the municipal Wmo investigation verify owner, date and local validity. The Wmo support adviser then places the text on current rules next to the source, before it goes to the record. [1] [2] [6] [8] [9]
Own capabilities call for professional data that can be demonstrated. So always set out own capabilities, the request for support, the network and the limitations investigated separately from each other. During the municipal investigation, do not adopt a classification that does not yet exist, and only after that step does the Wmo support adviser decide, with the source alongside, whether the text is ready for the record. [1] [2] [3] [7] [8]
Professional language around participation always needs source context to stay understandable. Place participation during the specific investigation, or otherwise with the kitchen table conversation, and during the municipality's investigation check the term used, the unit and its meaning. Compare that write-up with the Wmo record: the origin of participation stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [4] [8] [9]
You simply leave missing data on network support empty in the Wmo record, instead of filling them in yourself. Record the source, the life domain, the date and what is not yet known at that moment. During the municipal Wmo investigation, set that gap aside for targeted follow-up questions, so that meaning and next step around network support stay traceable in the record. [1] [2] [5] [9] [7]
You keep conflicting sources on a safety signal both visible in the Wmo record. Describe the signal from the perspective of participation, with attention to the resident's personal situation, and during the municipality's investigation name the different people reporting and observing separately. After that check, the Wmo support adviser decides what about this signal is saved in the record. [1] [2] [6] [7] [8]
With a reported limitation, there is a clear difference between what you observe and a Wmo decision, an eligibility decision, a medical diagnosis or a tailored provision. So keep the network, the request for support, own capabilities and the limitations investigated recorded separately. During the municipal Wmo investigation, do not add a professional decision that sounds neutral but is not substantiated; the Wmo support adviser then checks the text against the source, before it ends up in the record. [1] [2] [3] [4] [8] [9]
Within Wmo assessment, the Wmo support adviser links every safety signal to a source and to the home visit in which it came up. Place this home visit in the investigation at that moment, or during the kitchen table conversation, and during the municipality's investigation record the words, the observation and the stated interpretation separately. Compare that write-up with the record: the origin stays linked to the source. [1] [2] [5] [8] [9]
For the resident's perspective, the different source roles within Wmo assessment each stay readable separately. Record the source, the life domain, the date and what is still missing, and during the municipal Wmo investigation make clear per passage where it comes from. That way meaning and next step around the resident's perspective stay traceable in the Wmo record. [1] [2] [6] [9] [10]
A missing Wmo decision simply stays missing in the text. Always describe this topic with participation and the resident's personal situation as the framework, and during the municipality's investigation leave its owner and status open. The Wmo support adviser checks the source and decides what about the Wmo decision is saved in the record. [1] [2] [5] [10] [7]
The Wmo support adviser only links an effect or a cause in a description of effect to evidence that can be demonstrated. Keep what the person can do themselves, the request for support, the network and the limitations investigated recorded separately. During the municipal Wmo investigation, separate expectation, observation and assessment from each other; the Wmo support adviser then checks the text against the source, before it goes to the record. [1] [2] [4] [7] [8]
The final check when evaluating support always follows the source. Place this evaluation with the ongoing investigation, or otherwise during the kitchen table conversation, and during the municipality's investigation go through the timing, the uncertainty and the follow-up. Compare that write-up with the record: the origin of this evaluation stays linked to the source. An evaluation you made with voice-driven reporting goes next to the earlier investigation report. [1] [2] [6] [3] [8] [9]
Starter costs €20, Pro €40 and Unlimited €80 per month, excl. VAT. Separate terms apply to teams. The Wmo support adviser weighs the price against the type of contact, such as a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and against the record agreements that apply. When doing so, compare the price, the correction time and the record needs during the municipality's investigation. The origin of that comparison stays linked to the source in the Wmo record. [1] [2] [3] [14]
Privacy within Wmo assessment starts with a clear purpose and a clear legal basis. That choice depends on the contact, whether it is a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and on the record agreements that go with it. During the municipality's investigation, agree reading and approval roles locally, so that meaning and next step around privacy stay traceable in the record. [1] [2] [4] [15]
By hand, dictated or with Hysio: each way calls for its own check. After a kitchen table conversation, what you mainly want is for the resident's own capabilities and network to be properly reflected in the investigation report. When comparing, count your own assessment as well; then you decide what goes into the record. Working with Hysio is also called AI reporting. [1] [2] [5] [14] [15]
You can try it free for 14 days. Weigh the trial period against the contact you use it for, such as a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and against the record agreements that go with it. During the municipality's investigation, test safely for time, faithfulness to the source and readability. The Wmo support adviser then checks the text against the source before it goes into the record. [1] [2] [6] [14]
For Wmo assessment, no universal integration with every record system has been promised. The handover depends on the contact, whether it is a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and on the record agreements that apply. During the municipality's investigation, check the handover, the recipient and the technical way of working: the origin stays linked to the source in the record. [1] [2] [3] [15]
Within Wmo assessment, the Wmo record only becomes usable for the Wmo support adviser after a person has checked the source. You set up that check per contact, such as a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and per record agreement that goes with it. During the municipality's investigation, go through the professional language, the gaps and the follow-up, so that meaning and next step stay traceable in the record. [1] [2] [4] [16]
Within Wmo assessment, the Wmo support adviser always starts a demonstrable change at the source passage itself. That correction depends on the contact, such as a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and on the record agreements that apply. During the municipality's investigation, only change what is demonstrably substantiated; only after that check does the Wmo support adviser decide what is saved in the record. [1] [2] [5] [15]
Words that are missing or unclear are simply left open by the Wmo support adviser within Wmo assessment. That applies to every type of contact, whether it is a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, with the related record agreements. During the municipality's investigation, mark that gap for targeted follow-up questions; the Wmo support adviser, with the source alongside, decides when the text is ready for the record. [1] [2] [6] [15]
After a kitchen table conversation, include reading through and completing the investigation report when you count time saved. Measure that gain per contact, such as a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and per related record agreement. During the municipality's investigation, compare similar contacts, including the quality of the record: the origin of that comparison stays linked to the source in the record. [1] [2] [5] [14]
Within Wmo assessment, it is best to introduce Hysio step by step, tailored to the contact, whether it is a kitchen table conversation, a home visit or an investigation report, and to the record agreements that go with it. During the municipality's investigation, always choose one contact purpose with a fixed final check, so that meaning and next step stay traceable in the record. [1] [2] [6] [14] [16]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.