Skip to content

Hysio Cardiothoracic Surgery

AI Voice-Driven Reporting for cardiothoracic surgeons

After a consultation or the postoperative ward round, you say what you saw and discussed. Hysio turns it into a report, with drains, haemodynamics and the ICU handover kept separate.

Cardiothoracic surgeon consulting with the surgical team in the operating theatre
Your care encounter stays central, Hysio documents the relevant information.

Spoken care information from your care encounter

Cardiothoracic surgery

A structured report in your professional terminology

From care encounter to report

You work. Hysio documents.

Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.

Document

Keep your attention on the care encounter.

Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.

AI assistants

Suited to your work.

  • Hysio Cardiothoracic Consultation
  • Hysio Cardiothoracic Preoperative Intake
  • Hysio Cardiothoracic Postoperative Ward Round
  • Hysio Cardiothoracic SOAP Note

You stay in control of what gets saved.

In your workday

How Hysio fits into your workday

More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.

  1. You document the conversation

    State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.

  2. Hysio creates your report

    The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.

  3. You review and copy the report

    Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.

Try it yourself

Experience what Hysio can mean for your work.

Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.

  • No credit card needed
  • Cancel any month
  • GDPR-compliant, data hosted in the EU
Profession Hysio Cardiothoracic Surgery

For your team

Share with a colleague

Send this page to someone you would like to explore Hysio with.

Quick answer From the sternotomy conversation to ICU handover 50 questions with cited sources

Quick answer

From thoracic consultation to ICU handover

For surgery on the heart, lungs and chest, with a dedicated place for indication, procedure and perioperative handover.

Read how Hysio supports a thoracic consultation, a preoperative intake or the ward round after surgery.

What does voice-driven reporting mean for the cardiothoracic surgeon?
First the conversation, then the report: with voice-driven reporting, Hysio turns a consultation or postoperative ward round into a cardiothoracic report. This is also called AI documentation. For cardiothoracic surgery there are four documentation formats: Cardiothoracic Consultation, Cardiothoracic Preoperative Intake, Cardiothoracic Postoperative Ward Round and Cardiothoracic SOAP Note. [2] [3] [4] [5]
What stays tied to the source?
Around a thoracic procedure, Hysio only puts in the report what was said or supplied: history, results, the client's perspective, your assessment and the agreements. That is how admin with AI works here: nothing is added that nobody said. [1] [11]
Who determines the content?
You, as the cardiothoracic surgeon. You check indication, procedure and handover and correct anything that is not right before you save. [1] [9]
How does the report follow cardiothoracic surgery?
The structure follows heart, lung and thoracic surgery around the operation and handover. In an ICU handover, drains, haemodynamics and agreements appear as you state them, and you assess the report. [1] [11] [10]
What does Hysio not do?
You set the indication for surgery. The report contains what was said during the ward round; Hysio does not choose a treatment and does not take over any acute decision. [9] [10]
  • Profile code 055
  • Documentation formats 4 profession-specific documentation formats: Hysio Cardiothoracic Consultation, Hysio Cardiothoracic Preoperative Intake, Hysio Cardiothoracic Postoperative Ward Round, Hysio Cardiothoracic SOAP Note.
  • Source focus heart, lung and thoracic surgery around the operation and handover
  • Record boundary the report follows the ward round; you decide what goes into the record

Voice-driven reporting in cardiothoracic surgery

Which format fits the first conversation about a sternotomy? #

The stage of this contact determines which report structure fits the reason for the visit: Cardiothoracic Consultation, Cardiothoracic Preoperative Intake, Cardiothoracic Postoperative Ward Round and Cardiothoracic SOAP Note each organise the same parts around the sternotomy. Haemodynamic information and the ICU handover are only included if the source mentions them; the thoracic procedure and drains remain your assessment. This keeps the format tied to what was said in this specific contact, not to a fixed assumption about the operation. [2] [3] [4] [5] [1] [11]

How do the procedure and the ICU handover each get their own place? #

In the record, you place the ICU handover and the thoracic procedure under their own fixed headings, so you can find them separately from the sternotomy and drains. Haemodynamic information gets a separate line as soon as this contact mentions it. Hysio keeps this layout the same for each documentation format, so the same parts sit in the same place in every cardiothoracic record. You assess which details are complete enough to save. [2] [1] [10]

Where does information about drains go in the record? #

Record drains as the source mentions them: number, position and what was agreed about them, without adding your own interpretation. Link this to the ICU handover and the thoracic procedure in the same record pathway, so the sternotomy and haemodynamic information stay together. Hysio organises these parts in your structure in advance; you transfer them to your medical record system yourself and check that everything is correct before you save. [10] [1] [2]

How do you handle sensitive information about a thoracic procedure with care? #

When making privacy choices, you limit information about the thoracic procedure to what this contact needs: no drains, haemodynamic information or ICU handover that was not discussed. Record separately whether and how the sternotomy was shared with the patient or relatives, and which consent applies. Hysio only notes what the source provides; you decide what may be shared further and with whom. [8] [11] [1]

Does voice-driven reporting cost more for major thoracic procedures? #

For a cardiothoracic surgeon, Hysio works on a subscription basis. For cardiothoracic surgery, Starter costs €20 per month, Pro €40 and Unlimited €80, excl. VAT. With yearly billing, two of the twelve months are free. The price does not depend on haemodynamic information or a specific procedure. The surgeon checks the text and decides what goes into the record according to local agreements. [6] [7]

When do you choose your own template after a sternotomy? #

Your own template fits a sternotomy when your team already uses a fixed local layout that does not map one-to-one onto the Hysio structure, for example for the thoracic procedure or haemodynamic information. In that case, compare both layouts: if the ICU handover and drains remain traceable to the source, you can use them side by side. If the Hysio layout does fit, your own route is usually not needed. [1] [10] [11]

How do you check that the ICU handover matches what was said? #

During the source check, you read the ICU handover back next to the original consultation, dictation or transcript and compare whether the sternotomy and drains have been carried over correctly. You check haemodynamic information and the thoracic procedure in the same way: a fixed documentation format does not automatically make the content correct, that remains your assessment. Only after this check do you save the report definitively. [1] [11] [9]

How do you stay with the client while you check the drains? #

With drains, you keep your attention on the client by holding the conversation first and only then recording what was discussed. Hysio organises the ICU handover, the thoracic procedure and haemodynamic information in the background, so you are not busy typing during the sternotomy or the follow-up conversation. Check afterwards whether the note reflects the conversation correctly, so the client can rely on it. [1] [2] [10]

What makes voice-driven reporting with Hysio different for a thoracic procedure? #

For the thoracic procedure, Hysio organises the separate parts of the contact, such as drains, haemodynamic information and the ICU handover, in a fixed, recognisable structure and links them to their source. Where your own template often starts empty, Hysio fills the layout straight away with what was said. You remain responsible for the assessment of the sternotomy and for what ultimately goes into the record. [1] [2] [10]

How do you start with Hysio for haemodynamic data? #

At the input step, start with a straightforward contact, for example a short consultation in which haemodynamic information is discussed. Let Hysio organise the thoracic procedure and the sternotomy as the source provides them, and then check yourself whether drains and the ICU handover have been carried over correctly. Only expand to more contacts once this first check has gone well. [7] [8] [1]

Documentation formats for the cardiothoracic surgeon

Which format fits an outpatient conversation about a thoracic procedure? #

Hysio Cardiothoracic Consultation fits an outpatient conversation in which the reason for the visit, the current condition and the agreed follow-up are central. The cardiothoracic surgeon keeps history, findings and professional assessment separate. A preoperative intake or postoperative ward round gets its own format when that care moment defines the contact. [2] [1] [11]

How do you record the intake conversation before a sternotomy? #

Cardiothoracic Preoperative Intake fits the first extensive conversation before a procedure: the reason for the visit, past medical history and the context around haemodynamic information and the sternotomy have their place here. The ICU handover and drains only come into view once the operation has taken place, and then belong to a different documentation format. You describe the thoracic procedure as the source provides it at that moment, without anticipating the course. [3] [1] [11]

Which format do you use for the ward round after thoracic surgery? #

Cardiothoracic Postoperative Ward Round fits a short, recurring contact after the operation: a daily ward round in which drains, haemodynamic information and the course are reviewed. You include the sternotomy and the ICU handover as they were discussed at that moment, without repeating the preoperative context. The thoracic procedure remains the fixed background of every ward round contact during admission. [4] [1] [11]

When do you choose a SOAP note after cardiac surgery? #

Cardiothoracic SOAP Note fits when you want to record a contact according to Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, for example during a ward round with a clear assessment and next step. You place the sternotomy, drains and haemodynamic information under Objective; the ICU handover and the thoracic procedure return under Plan once they have been discussed. This layout is particularly useful if your team already works with SOAP. [5] [1] [11]

Which format fits a thoracic procedure: consultation, procedure or postoperative handover? #

Which format fits the thoracic procedure depends on the moment: an outpatient conversation calls for Cardiothoracic Consultation, the preparation for Cardiothoracic Preoperative Intake, and the contact after the operation for Cardiothoracic Postoperative Ward Round or Cardiothoracic SOAP Note. Drains and haemodynamic information get the same place in every format. You only include the sternotomy and the ICU handover if this specific contact actually mentions them. [1] [2] [11]

When do you choose an intake for abnormal haemodynamics? #

You choose an intake when haemodynamic information is discussed for the first time around a planned procedure, for example when preparing for a sternotomy. If the operation has already taken place and the focus is on the change since then, a follow-up contact fits better: in it, you record the thoracic procedure, drains and the ICU handover as they were reported at that moment. The choice therefore follows the moment in the pathway, not the topic itself. [1] [2] [11]

What do you note about the sternotomy wound at a follow-up contact? #

After a follow-up contact, the details that belong with the sternotomy are the reason, how it was performed and the findings as the source describes them, supplemented with haemodynamic information and the ICU handover if they were discussed. Do not add operative details that were not mentioned in the contact. You link the thoracic procedure and drains to the same contact moment, so the report remains traceable to a clear source. [1] [2] [11]

What does the ICU need to know from your handover? #

An ICU handover includes who provided the information, who receives it and which agreement was made, together with the relevant haemodynamic information and the status of drains. First check whether sharing is permitted before details about the sternotomy or the thoracic procedure are handed over. Only include what the recipient needs to be able to take up the follow-up. [1] [2] [11]

How do you keep drain output apart from other findings? #

Keep drains separate from other sources by noting for each sentence whether it is your own observation, a result provided or a statement from the patient. You treat haemodynamic information and the ICU handover in the same way: keep observation, source and assessment apart instead of mixing them in one running sentence. This also keeps the sternotomy and the thoracic procedure traceable to the original source. [1] [2] [11]

How do you compare recovery after a thoracic procedure between contacts? #

Compare the thoracic procedure between contacts by placing the same key points side by side each time: what was the situation at the sternotomy, and what has changed since then in drains or haemodynamic information. Only name a change that the source actually mentions, not what you expect yourself. You use the ICU handover as a fixed reference point between two consecutive contacts. [1] [2] [11]

Drains, sternotomy and haemodynamics

How do you describe an earlier thoracic procedure in the history? #

Describe the thoracic procedure in the history as the patient or the referral letter provides it: the reason, previous complaints and the course so far, in the source's own words. Only add the sternotomy or haemodynamic information when they were actually discussed during this contact. Drains and the ICU handover do not belong in the history; they have their place in a later, postoperative contact. [1] [11]

Who supplied the haemodynamic information? #

For haemodynamic information, always note who the source is: the patient, a relative, a referrer or your own observation during the contact. Keep that separate from your professional assessment of the thoracic procedure or the sternotomy, so it remains clear later what was provided and what you established. This also keeps drains and the ICU handover traceable to the person who reported them. [1] [11]

How do you record the sternotomy wound with date and finding? #

For the sternotomy, note the associated measurement moment with instrument, unit and time, as the source provides it, for example haemodynamic information or another measured value from this contact. You determine the professional meaning of that measurement yourself; Hysio adds no conclusion. You include drains and the ICU handover in the same way, with their own measurement moment and origin. [1] [11]

How do you link the ICU handover to a lab or imaging result? #

Link the ICU handover to a result by placing the investigation, date and source together, so it remains clear which result belongs to which contact. You place your own assessment of the sternotomy or the thoracic procedure separately next to it, not mixed with the result itself. You treat drains and haemodynamic information in the same way: first the source data, only then your interpretation. [1] [11]

Does Hysio assess images of the heart or chest? #

No, Hysio does not assess images. For drains, Hysio carries over the imaging report provided, with haemodynamic information and the sternotomy as the radiologist or the team recorded them. The images themselves stay with you and your colleagues; Hysio adds no reading of its own. You link the thoracic procedure and the ICU handover to the same investigation, so the origin remains clear. [10] [9] [11]

Which abbreviations and terms do you use for a thoracic procedure? #

For the thoracic procedure, you use the professional term your team actually uses, for example sternotomy for the surgical approach; Hysio takes that term literally from the source. Write out abbreviations, such as ICU in ICU handover, in full once, so colleagues can read them without doubt. You describe drains and haemodynamic information in the same way, in the wording used in this contact. [1] [11]

How do you note haemodynamic information from a relative? #

Note haemodynamic information from a relative as a statement, with the source attached: relative, referrer or patient. Record separately whether there is consent to share that information before anything further happens around the thoracic procedure or the sternotomy. You only record drains and the ICU handover from a relative if they actually said something about them. [1] [11]

What does the team want to know about the sternotomy? #

For the sternotomy, the team mainly needs to know which discipline provided the information and who takes up the follow-up, alongside the essentials of drains and haemodynamic information in language everyone can understand. You describe the ICU handover so that a colleague from another specialty can follow it without explanation. You explain the thoracic procedure as soon as that is relevant for the multidisciplinary meeting. [1] [2] [11]

Which case best shows how you record an ICU handover? #

A good example of the ICU handover is a short, real contact: the handover from the operating theatre to the intensive care unit after a sternotomy, with haemodynamic information and the agreed follow-up. Such an example shows the actual conversation, not an invented diagnosis or outcome. Drains and the thoracic procedure come back in the same case, exactly as they were reported at that moment. [1] [11] [2]

What belongs in a handover about drains? #

Keep a handover about drains short and focused: source, number and the agreement that goes with it, so the recipient can trace the rest from the record themselves. You only include haemodynamic information if it is needed for the follow-up. You describe the sternotomy, the thoracic procedure and the ICU handover in the same source-bound way, without extra explanation that the contact did not provide. [10] [8] [11]

Sources, privacy and boundaries after thoracic surgery

Does Hysio draw a diagnostic conclusion from drain output? #

No, Hysio does not make a diagnosis. For drains, Hysio organises what was said about the ICU handover and the thoracic procedure, but the cardiothoracic surgeon determines their meaning, such as an indication for removal, themselves. The sternotomy and haemodynamic information are likewise only organised, never assessed. The medical conclusion stays with you in every contact. [9] [1] [11]

Who reviews the report of the thoracic procedure before it is saved? #

You check the thoracic procedure before it is saved, not Hysio. Before you save a report definitively, you read back whether drains, haemodynamic information, the sternotomy and the ICU handover have been carried over correctly and completely from this contact. Hysio does not choose record content and does not take over that professional decision. Only after your approval is the report ready for the record. [1] [9] [11]

What do you do if haemodynamic data are missing? #

If haemodynamic information is missing, mark it as missing or not discussed instead of inventing a value or conclusion yourself. Hysio does the same for the thoracic procedure, the sternotomy, drains or the ICU handover: an empty part stays empty until the source provides it. This keeps it clear what still needs to be checked, instead of a gap in the text being concealed. [1] [9] [11]

Can you use Hysio in an acute situation after a sternotomy? #

No, do not use Hysio for acute triage around a sternotomy. In an acute situation, you act first according to the local protocol; only afterwards, once the situation has been assessed, do you record haemodynamic information, drains or the ICU handover in a source-bound way. You then describe the thoracic procedure with the same care as in any other contact, but never ahead of the acute decision itself. [9] [8] [11]

Who may receive the ICU handover from you? #

Who may receive information about the ICU handover is for you to decide based on purpose and consent: a colleague who takes over the follow-up may, a random third party may not. Check this for the sternotomy, drains and haemodynamic information too before you share anything. Hysio records what was agreed, but does not itself assess who gets access to the thoracic procedure or other data. [8] [11] [1]

Does Hysio make a plan for the management of drains? #

No, Hysio does not draw up a treatment plan. Around drains, Hysio places the ICU handover and the thoracic procedure under a heading, but the choice of removal, further management or a new operation stays with the cardiothoracic surgeon. The sternotomy and haemodynamic information are likewise only recorded. You determine and describe the plan itself; Hysio organises it afterwards in the report. [9] [10] [11]

How do you leave doubt about the procedure on record? #

Note uncertainty about the thoracic procedure as it was expressed in the contact, for example as a doubt or an open question, without making it stronger than the source indicates. Hysio does the same for the sternotomy, drains or the ICU handover: if something remains unclear, it stays visible in the text. You note haemodynamic information with the same restraint, so the open question remains recognisable. [1] [11] [9]

How do you deal with sources that give different haemodynamic values? #

If sources differ on haemodynamic information, keep both accounts separately with their origin instead of choosing between them yourself. Hysio does the same for the thoracic procedure, the sternotomy or drains: conflicting information is placed side by side, not silently merged. Only after you have assessed which account is correct do you process that in the ICU handover or the follow-up. [1] [11]

How do you note medication after a sternotomy? #

Note medication and the sternotomy literally as the source provides them, including dosage, unit and time where they were mentioned. Hysio does not interpret this data; the cardiothoracic surgeon assesses the meaning of a change in medication after a sternotomy. With voice-driven admin, haemodynamics, drains and the ICU handover are carried over in the same way, without anything added to the measured values. [1] [11] [9]

How do you check the ICU handover before saving? #

Check the ICU handover before saving by reading the text back next to the source and date, and checking whether the sternotomy, drains and haemodynamic information are represented correctly. Correct any discrepancies before you save the report definitively; Hysio does not finalise anything automatically. You check the thoracic procedure in the same way, as the last step before the record is updated. [1] [8] [9] [11]

Introduction and daily use

How do you prepare an ICU handover after cardiac surgery? #

Prepare an ICU handover by agreeing in advance who reads the text and which information about the thoracic procedure the recipient really needs. Set out the sternotomy, drains and haemodynamic information in a fixed order, so a colleague can read through it quickly. Only finalise once you have checked that the handover matches the contact. [10] [8] [11] [2]

Which team agreement do you make about recording drains? #

For drains, you need a team agreement on fixed headings and shared terms, so the ICU handover and the thoracic procedure look the same in every report. Also agree who may approve the sternotomy and haemodynamic information before a report goes into the record. Without such an agreement, colleagues may read the same information differently. [1] [2] [10]

How do you start with a small trial around one type of thoracic procedure? #

A defined assessment of the report structure around a thoracic procedure concerns a recognisable contact, for example a single consultation in which the sternotomy comes up. Then collect corrections on drains and haemodynamic information before you continue. If the ICU handover is also correct in this first example, only then are further contacts considered for assessment. [7] [8] [1]

How do you adapt the report on haemodynamics to your centre's agreements? #

Adapt a report on haemodynamic information to local agreements by comparing the headings with what your team uses for the thoracic procedure and the sternotomy, and adjusting the layout where needed. Also check who may authorise drains and the ICU handover before the report becomes final. Have a colleague check the result before you start using it as a standard. [10] [1] [11]

How do you dictate a postoperative ward round after sternotomy? #

Start with who you are speaking to and which day after surgery it is. Then name wound status, drains and haemodynamics in your own words, and end with the agreements. That is how voice-driven reporting works on the ward round: Hysio puts it into the format of the postoperative ward round. Anything you do not mention stays empty. [1] [11] [2]

How do you measure how much time an ICU handover takes? #

Measure time around the ICU handover by keeping track within your own team of how long drafting and checking a report takes, and comparing that with your usual way of working. Do the same for the sternotomy, drains or haemodynamic information before you make any statement about time savings. Always give thoroughness around the thoracic procedure priority over a percentage promised in advance. [1] [10] [7]

Which conditions apply to the trial period on the cardiothoracic ward? #

For drains, the same trial conditions apply as for any other part of your documentation: the central Hysio free trial applies to the whole account, not per topic. Use that period to assess whether haemodynamic information, the sternotomy and the ICU handover are organised in a usable way. You include the thoracic procedure in that test in the same way, before you choose a subscription. [7] [6] [8]

Where do you read the pricing and terms alongside your heart centre's agreements? #

On the pricing page, you can read the current costs and terms of a Hysio subscription. The legal overview sets out the agreements on data use and responsibilities. A thoracic procedure or an ICU handover has no subscription rate of its own. For use in the cardiothoracic work process, you keep the platform terms and the local care and record agreements side by side; one document does not replace the other. [6] [8] [9]

How do you record your own terms for haemodynamics? #

Record your own terminology for haemodynamic information by agreeing within your team how you write the thoracic procedure, sternotomy and common abbreviations, and sharing that overview. Hysio carries over the terms as the source provides them; the chosen spelling remains your agreement. You describe drains and the ICU handover in the same way, so it stays recognisable for colleagues. [1] [10] [11]

How do you organise a complicated course after sternotomy? #

Organise a complex case around a sternotomy by first splitting the contact into separate sources: what came from the patient, what from the team and what is your own observation. Set out haemodynamic information, drains and the ICU handover under that as bullet points, without adding an extra conclusion that the source does not give. Only describe the thoracic procedure after this split, so the case stays clear. [1] [11] [2] [9]

Sources

  1. 1 Hysio: Beroepsprofiel de cardiothoracale chirurgie (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  2. 2 Hysio: Hysio Cardiothoracaal Consult (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  3. 3 Hysio: Hysio Cardiothoracale Preoperatieve Intake (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  4. 4 Hysio: Hysio Cardiothoracale Postoperatieve Visite (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 25 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  5. 5 Hysio: Hysio Cardiothoracaal SOEP-Verslag (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 26 augustus 2026 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  6. 6 Hysio: Actuele Hysio-prijzen (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-26 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  7. 7 Hysio: Actuele proefperiode (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-08-31 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  8. 8 Hysio: Hysio Privacyverklaring (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  9. 9 Hysio: Hysio Disclaimer (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  10. 10 Hysio: Hysio en medische dossiersystemen (interne Hysio-documentatie) Document date: 2026-07-16 Accessed on 2026-08-31
  11. 11 KNMG / CGS: Besluit cardio-thoracale chirurgie Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  12. 12 KNMG / CGS: Cardio-thoracale chirurgie, regelgevingspagina Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  13. 13 NVT: Opleidingsplan cardio-thoracale chirurgie Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  14. 14 NVT: Registratie congenitale cardio-thoracale chirurgie Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  15. 15 NVT: Kwaliteitsvisitaties Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  16. 16 Zorginzicht: Kwaliteitsregistratie Cardiochirurgie Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  17. 17 Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ): Toetsingskader 'perioperatief traject' Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  18. 18 Richtlijnendatabase (Federatie Medisch Specialisten), uitgegeven door NVA en NVvH: Perioperatief traject, stap 12: ontslag uit de instelling Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  19. 19 Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap (NHG): Gegevensuitwisseling huisarts-specialist (HASP) Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  20. 20 NHG: Richtlijn Informatie-uitwisseling tussen huisarts en medisch specialist Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  21. 21 KNMG: Richtlijn Omgaan met Medische Gegevens Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  22. 22 KNMG: Medisch dossier en beroepsgeheim Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  23. 23 Ministerie van VWS: Uitleg opdracht voorbehouden handelingen Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09
  24. 24 Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit (NZa): Zorgsectoren, medisch-specialistische zorg Document date: 2026-08-09 Accessed on 2026-08-09

Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.