Document
Keep your attention on the care encounter.
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
Hysio Systemic Therapy
Hysio supports systemic therapy with a source-bound report structure around three parts: requests for help from several people and relational context; interactions, differences and resources; and network agreements and evaluation.
A structured report in your professional terminology
From care encounter to report
Hysio turns spoken information into a report. Choose the report format for the conversation you are documenting.
Document
Record the conversation and clearly state your own findings and agreed actions.
AI assistants
You stay in control of what gets saved.
In your workday
More attention for the conversation, less typing afterwards.
State relevant information, your own findings and agreed actions aloud so you can find them in your report.
The information appears under the headings of your chosen report format, so you can review each section.
Check names, facts and agreed actions. Edit the text where needed before using the report in your records.
Try it yourself
Try Hysio free for 14 days or schedule a personal demo.
For your team
Quick answer
Three documentation formats for the systemic therapist: intake, session and network and evaluation meeting. Every voice in the conversation keeps its own place, and the interpretation stays with you.
For systemic therapy, Hysio offers fixed report structures around three parts: requests for help from several people and relational context; interactions, differences and resources; and network agreements and evaluation.
For systemic therapy there are three documentation formats: the Systemic Therapy Intake, the Systemic Therapy Session and the Systemic Therapy Network and Evaluation Meeting. Each format organises the perspectives of the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist separately, and only when the source actually supports that information. You, as the systemic therapist, assess relational patterns, consent and the final choices for the record; Hysio does not draw its own conclusion about them. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
The Systemic Therapy Intake organises requests for help from several people and relational context by placing the perspectives of each person present side by side, without merging them into one reading. The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist remain separate sources. Relational evaluation information is only given a place when it has been explicitly discussed; you yourself assess the shared language, the consent and the choices for the record. [1] [2] [5] [6]
The Systemic Therapy Session fits well when interactions, differences and resources within the family have already become visible, for example during a follow-up conversation. The format places shared language alongside network and division of roles, with the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist as separate sources. Interaction patterns are only given a place if the source actually mentions them; the final interpretation stays with you. [1] [3] [5] [6]
The Network and Evaluation Meeting records which network agreements have been made and how the system experiences that evaluation, with network and division of roles alongside evaluation and follow-up. The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist always remain recognisable as separate sources. Here too: information only goes into the report if it has actually been discussed, and you decide on the final reading. [1] [4] [5] [6]
The difference lies mainly in the timing: the Intake organises requests for help from several people and relational context at the start of the process, while the Network and Evaluation Meeting records evaluation and follow-up towards the end or at an interim checkpoint. Both formats treat the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist as separate sources. You choose which format fits each phase of the process. [1] [2] [4] [5] [6]
Multi-voiced requests for help and relational context take shape because each person involved remains a source of their own alongside the others, instead of merging into one summary. Interaction patterns are only noted when the source names them explicitly, and the same applies to relational evaluation information. You ultimately assess the shared language, the consent and which format best covers the conversation. [1] [2] [5] [6]
Yes, relational evaluation information and instruments end up in the report as soon as they have been explicitly mentioned in the conversation or record, never on Hysio's own initiative. Interactions, differences and resources are then placed alongside shared language, with the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist as separate sources. The final assessment of that information stays with you as the systemic therapist. [1] [2] [5] [6]
Interpretation always stays with you as the systemic therapist: Hysio organises the perspectives of each person present, but does not draw its own conclusion from them. Shared language is placed alongside network and division of roles, while the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist remain separate sources. Interaction patterns are only given a place if the source names them, and consent and the choices for the record remain your decision. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Always organise the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist as separate sources side by side, without merging their statements into one joint reading. You place network and division of roles alongside evaluation and follow-up, and you only note interaction patterns when the source actually mentions them. You yourself assess the shared language, the consent and the final choices for the record within systemic therapy. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Within the systemic therapy conversation, you record the perspectives of each person present with the source the information comes from. Hysio organises requests for help from several people, relational context, evaluation and follow-up without merging differing readings. The systemic therapist checks the attribution to sources, the consent and the final choices for the record, so that differences between those present stay recognisable. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Describe requests for help from several people and relational context in the Intake by noting each perspective separately, with network and division of roles as concrete context. Always distinguish what a person present says themselves from your professional conclusion. Hysio organises the contributions of the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist, but draws no conclusion of its own about safety, medication and substance use information. You record what was explicitly discussed and which point is still open. [1] [2] [5] [6]
The perspectives of each person present belong in the Intake as soon as someone has actually voiced their own request for help, concern or view of the relational context, not as a summary afterwards. Multi-voiced requests for help and relational context thus help to distinguish each person's own input from your professional conclusion. Hysio organises what the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist each contribute, without adding any statement of its own about safety, medication or substance use. You decide which point remains open. [1] [2] [5] [6]
The distinction lies in the timing: the Session organises interactions, differences and resources that come up during the ongoing process, while the Intake already does this at the start. Both formats treat the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist as separate sources. In neither of them does Hysio draw its own conclusion about safety, medication and substance use information. [1] [2] [3] [5] [6]
The Network and Evaluation Meeting fits when network and division of roles are the main topic, for example at an evaluation point with the wider system. The perspectives of each person present serve as concrete context. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist, but draws no conclusion of its own about safety, medication and substance use information. You record which point remains open. [1] [4] [5] [6]
Relational patterns and interactions stay recognisable as a source because, for each observation, you record who contributed it, instead of noting patterns as established fact. The request for help from several people helps to distinguish shared language from your own conclusion. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist around those relational patterns, without adding any statement of its own about medication or substance use. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Process the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist as separate sources side by side, and never merge their statements into one joint voice. The request for help from several people helps to distinguish network and division of roles from your professional conclusion. Hysio organises the contributions around shared language, but draws no conclusion of its own about safety, medication and substance use information. You decide what is still open. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Link network and division of roles to a follow-up appointment by recording in the Intake who takes on which task and when that will be evaluated. With voice-driven reporting, you say that out loud at the end of the conversation. The request for help from several people helps to distinguish evaluation and follow-up from your own conclusion. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist around that appointment, without drawing its own conclusions about safety, medication or substance use. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Separate observation from interpretation by first noting what you literally see or hear, and only then marking your own professional reading of it separately. The request for help from several people helps to distinguish the perspectives of each person present from that conclusion. Hysio organises the contributions of the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist, but draws no conclusion of its own about safety, medication and substance use information. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
If interactions, differences and resources are missing from the source, mark this explicitly in the Network and Evaluation Meeting instead of writing down an assumption. The request for help from several people helps to distinguish relational patterns and interactions from your conclusion. Hysio organises what the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist did contribute, without concluding anything itself about safety, medication or substance use. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Such a family conversation fits the perspectives of each person present because the Intake records each perspective, each interaction and each joint agreement as a separate source, instead of merging them into one reading. The request for help from several people helps to distinguish shared language from your professional conclusion. Hysio organises the contributions of the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist without a conclusion of its own. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
A systemic therapy record carries the source for requests for help from several people and relational context, plus the origin of each separate perspective. The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist stay recognisable as separate sources, especially when their readings differ. You connect consent and the interaction pattern with that context; Hysio does not add assumptions. This keeps visible where each piece of information comes from. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
Separate the client's perspective from your own professional interpretation by always stating the source for interactions, differences and resources before you assess anything yourself. The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist stay visible as separate sources, even when their readings are contradictory. You connect consent and the interaction pattern with the record context, and Hysio does not add any assumption of its own. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist stay recognisable because each statement remains linked to the person who made it, instead of being merged into one family voice. This applies especially when relational patterns and shared language diverge. You connect consent and the interaction pattern with the record context, and Hysio never adds anything itself. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
Relational patterns and interactions require consent from everyone whose statements are recorded, not only from the client who requested the contact. The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist remain separate sources when their readings differ. You connect that consent and the interaction pattern with the record context; Hysio does not add assumptions itself about who agrees to what. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
Note the difference between the perspectives of each person present and relational patterns and interactions by tracing each back separately to the source that contributed it, instead of summarising them into one reading. This keeps the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist recognisable when their observations diverge. You ultimately decide how the two relate to each other within the record context. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
The Network and Evaluation Meeting includes what the system actually discussed: the source for interactions, differences and resources, and the origin of the perspectives of each person present. The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist remain separate sources in it. With voice-driven admin, you connect consent and the interaction pattern with the record context, without Hysio adding anything itself. [1] [4] [6] [7]
You recognise an explicit decision about network agreements and evaluation because the source literally states who agreed to it and when, not because it seems to follow logically from the conversation. The client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist remain separate sources, even if their recollection of the decision differs. You yourself assess whether the decision belongs in the record in that form. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
For network and division of roles, information about who carries which role and who disagrees about it is especially sensitive, particularly when family members experience this differently. That is why the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist remain separate sources in the record. You connect consent and the interaction pattern with that context; Hysio adds nothing itself. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
Keep an external letter recognisable alongside shared language by marking the letter as a source of its own, separate from what was said during the conversation itself. This keeps the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist recognisable, even when the letter gives a different reading than the conversation itself. You assess how the two relate to each other within the record context. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
The boundary lies in drawing conclusions: Hysio never turns one perspective into the truth and does not formulate a diagnosis, risk assessment or treatment decision. That is why the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist stay recognisable as separate sources, even with contradictory readings. That assessment, and the final choices for the record, always stay with you as the systemic therapist. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7]
Relational evaluation information and instruments fit systemic therapy as soon as they have been explicitly mentioned in the conversation or record, noted with the date and source context. An observation stays separate from your own interpretation; Hysio does not turn that information into a result or advice. Safety, medication and substance use information is also kept by the source with origin and date. You check all of this before you save. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Describe an observation of relational patterns and interactions by literally noting what you see or hear, without immediately attaching an explanation to it. Hysio does not turn that observation into a result or advice; you draw the conclusion yourself. You keep network and division of roles with origin and date, just like safety, medication and substance use information. Check this before you save. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Record safety, medication and substance use information per source and per person involved, always with the date and source context. An observation stays separate from your own interpretation; Hysio does not turn it into a result or advice. Network and division of roles follow the same rule: first origin and date, the conclusion comes later. You check everything before saving. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Process shared language by noting what was literally said, without attaching advice to it yourself; that step remains yours as the systemic therapist. You keep evaluation and follow-up with origin and date, just like safety, medication and substance use information. Hysio never turns the perspectives of each person present into a result or advice. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
For an intervention carried out in shared language, note what was said and done, even if there is no result yet; mark that explicitly as an open point. You keep the perspectives of each person present with origin and date. Hysio does not turn relational patterns and interactions into a result or advice; you check this before you save, together with the relevant professional terminology. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Handle conflicting perspectives of each person present and relational patterns and interactions by noting both side by side with their own source, instead of turning them into one correct reading. An observation stays separate from your conclusion; Hysio does not turn it into a result or advice. You keep safety, medication and substance use information separately with origin and date. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Describe an intervention for interactions, differences and resources together with the response that followed, without merging the two into one judgement. You keep shared language with origin and date, just like safety, medication and substance use information. Hysio does not turn network and division of roles into a result or advice; that interpretation is up to you. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Make network and division of roles visible by noting who carried which role according to the source, without inventing a result or outcome yourself. You keep evaluation and follow-up with origin and date. Hysio does not turn that information into a result or advice; you check the relevant professional terminology and the record context before you save. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
For the perspectives of each person present, you need professional terms that are common within your own team, so that the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist stay clearly distinguishable from one another. You keep evaluation and follow-up with origin and date. Hysio does not turn those professional terms into a result or advice of its own; you decide on their meaning. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Before saving, you check whether requests for help from several people and the perspectives of each person present are still linked to their source, whether observation and interpretation stay separate, and whether safety, medication and substance use information carries the correct origin and date. Hysio does not turn this into a result or advice itself. You check the relevant professional terminology and the record context as the last step of voice-driven reporting. [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] [7] [8]
Prepare a conversation about requests for help from several people and relational context by deciding in advance what role network and division of roles will play in it. Hysio organises the contributions of the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist per source, together with relational evaluation information. Test shared language and safety information against the actual conversation. You decide which information about evaluation and follow-up is ultimately saved tied to its source. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Fixed report sections mainly give the systemic therapist an overview: network agreements and evaluation get their own heading, as do evaluation and follow-up, so that the perspectives of each person present do not get lost. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist per source. That keeps the admin with AI clear after a family conversation. You decide which information is saved tied to its source. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
The systemic therapist keeps assessment central by first recording what the source says and checking the professional interpretation of it separately. Hysio organises the perspectives of each person present and other explicitly mentioned information, but does not draw its own conclusion. You decide what is saved. The perspectives of those present stay separately recognisable, so that the systemic therapist can assess differences and open points themselves. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
No, Hysio never independently turns one perspective into the truth and does not formulate a diagnosis, risk assessment or treatment decision. Interactions, differences and resources do get a recognisable place in the overview, together with relational patterns and interactions. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist, but that assessment always stays with you as the systemic therapist. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
The profile code for systemic therapy is 079 and links the profile of this profession to the central registration. Network agreements and evaluation, and shared language, get a recognisable place in how the conversation is structured. Here you can read how the Hysio Systemic Therapy Intake organises the professional content for systemic therapy and keeps it recognisable. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
You find the boundaries around privacy in how relational patterns and interactions are recorded: only with the consent of those involved and never as established fact for the whole system. Multi-voiced requests for help and network and division of roles get a recognisable, but always source-bound, place. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist; you decide what is saved. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
If no fixed format fits requests for help from several people and relational context, use your practice's manual reporting route, note the open point and check the source information before you save. Hysio does not independently choose a different content format; the systemic therapist decides what goes into the record. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Use Hysio on a busy day by briefly recording the perspectives of each person present straight after the conversation, instead of only at the end of the day. Network agreements and evaluation then still get a recognisable place. Hysio organises the contributions of the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist per source. You decide what you save. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Systemic therapy differs from psychotherapy in that the conversation explicitly puts interactions, differences and resources between several people involved at the centre, instead of the inner world of one client. That is why requests for help from several people and relational patterns and interactions both get a recognisable place. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist; you decide on the final reading. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Source-bound documentation means that each piece of information can be traced back to whoever contributed it: interactions, differences and resources only go into the record if the source names them. Shared language gets a recognisable place as well. Hysio organises contributions from the client, partner, family members, network and systemic therapist, but you decide what is ultimately saved. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Hysio creates the report. You remain responsible for what you save in the record.